WHO Poll

Clubfoot 12:04 Fri Mar 20
Following on from the VIkings thread, Amazon keep telling me i should watch this show "based on my viewing preferences"

Now it's got Paul Giamatti in it, so obviously i'm tempted, but can anyone shed anymore light on the matter please?

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

Mr John 7:36 Fri Mar 20
Re: Ironclad
I watched the first Ironclad film and was really disappointed. I love that type of film but it was just rubbish. Completely unrealistic and predictable.

I'm currently watching Sons of Anarchy, which I'm enjoying, up to season 4 and still not bored of it. Then going to watch season 3 of Vikings, which I'm really looking forward to.

jfk 3:59 Fri Mar 20
Re: Ironclad
Cloubfoot I hope your well mate, try watching The sopranos or the wire from the beginning .
If you've already seen the above two I'd suggest watching them again, nothing else comes close.
I wish you all the best.

clarky 12:39 Fri Mar 20
Re: Ironclad
It's fucking terrible!

DukeofDevo 12:23 Fri Mar 20
Re: Ironclad
That 'Battle for Blood' is a spin off, like Ironclad 3! the original with Paul whatsisface is worth watching!

Clubfoot 12:19 Fri Mar 20
Re: Ironclad

Grumpster 12:18 Fri Mar 20
Re: Ironclad
I watched a film recently called Ironclad: Battle For Blood, as it was on Sky and I've always liked a bit of medieval.

Whatever you do, don't ever waste 90 minutes of your life watching it as it's fucking atrocious.

Mr Kenzo 12:17 Fri Mar 20
Re: Ironclad
Rochester in Kent or the shit one in Essex ?

the coming of gary 12:16 Fri Mar 20
Re: Ironclad
based on the real life siege of Rochester castle. I enjoyed it

DukeofDevo 12:14 Fri Mar 20
Re: Ironclad
It's a film isn't it King John and all that! Lots of bloodletting takes place during the spell following the signing of Magna Carta, not bad for its ilk, worth a watch if you haven't got anything better to do

Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: