WHO Poll
Q: 2022 Summer Transfer Window - How many 1st team players will we sign before August 6th
a. None as Sullivan will wait until the last week before he gets his scattergun out the cupboard
28%
  
b. A couple of freebies paraded as superstars, usual hype to follow
26%
  
c. I'm more optimistic as surely they know we need to strengthen, 3-4 with decent money spent.
43%
  
d. Who gives a toss as we have a great squad already, I've already ordered the new replica kit, socks and all and can't wait to wear it at our first game, down the pub of course, I bleed claret & blue
3%
  



stoneman 3:28 Sat Jan 21
Women are stupid.
Why are women marching through U.K. Cities to protest at Donald Trumps presidency? It's a waste of tax payers money and will serve no purpose.

Get home girls and start making the tea there's a good girl 😘

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

stomper 3:45 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Surface
Abortion at 40 weeks is called 'birth'. A ridiculous debating point made by the Trump which should not have been allowed to stand.

stomper 3:39 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Mugwump

AfM 12:33 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Sorry for the confusion there, Mashed. I meant that the wikipedia quotes conveniently missed them out and you, by not checking the sources had simply become a mouthpiece for the republican party line on it.

I did not mean that you had removed those words.

mashed in maryland 12:23 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Andy, I did not remove the words "to counsel on abortions". Attempting to patronisingly accuse people of lying is what makes so many people on here just give up and call you a cunt (which is what I suspect you want me to do). I'm aware that the term "promoting" may well be used liberally in this bill. My point is that Trump (re)instating this bill is being painted as something its not, and a gaggle of screaming students and cat ladies dressed in vagina shaped hats and holding placards demanding free tampons and comparing themselves to guns and suffragettes and making no mention of this bill (or FGM, forced marriages, honour killings etc.) wins them absolutely no fans or support amongst the wider public and ultimately does no good.

This is the last time I will reply to you so don't bother with a retort.

The Kronic 12:12 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
You're fired!

AfM 12:12 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Completely, not compelling.

mashed in maryland 12:11 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Kronic

Well I said that I didn't mention it because it hadn't been discussed, you said that it HAD been discussed, so I was hoping you'd prove that it had been.

And no, I wouldn't support any laws like that.

AfM 12:11 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
I see mashed. Fair enough.

You simply took as read what Wikipedia said on it without noticing that the source of that description was George W Bush and conveniently removed the key words "to counsel on abortions"

As such, you sounding like the republican mouthpiece is compelling understandable.

My apologies.

The Kronic 12:08 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Yeah I'd love to have the time to do that...

Do you back his promise to overturn legislation which, if successful, will give states the right to once again make abortion a crime, even for victims of incestual rape?

mashed in maryland 12:03 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
AfM

From wikipedia

"The policy requires non-governmental organizations to "agree as a condition of their receipt of [U.S.] federal funds" that they would "neither perform nor actively promote abortion as a method of family planning in other nations".[7] The policy has exceptions for abortions done in response to rape, incest, or life-threatening conditions.[8]"

Right, how is that any different to what I've described it as?

mashed in maryland 12:00 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Find me one post on this thread today, prior to yours, which mentions it Kron.

AfM 12:00 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
So you simply don't be understand it, mashed?

Fair enough.

The Kronic 11:59 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Eh? It's been discussed ever since the tangerine fruit promised to overturn the decision.

Are you kissing his fat arse on that one too?

Mike Oxsaw 11:58 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Coffee 11:25 Tue Jan 24

There are plenty of people that would like to get their chops around some good smack, if that helps...

mashed in maryland 11:57 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
I see AfM has gone from accusing me of "pretending" (ie lying) to "using the exact words but in the wrong way".

My understanding is that the bill does what it says on the tin, and that is withhold US funding from any NGO which promotes abortion.

If you think there's some sinister hidden meaning then that's up to you.

mashed in maryland 11:53 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
By "left out" do you mean "didn't mention because it wasn't being discussed and hasn't happened yet anyway"?

AfM 11:51 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Fair enough, mashed.

That seems to be your response when you know you are wrong but fair enough.

Knowing that the 1973 Helms amendment already prohibits US money being spent on abortions abroad so that money was NOT spent on those things.

Therefore knowing that Trump signing this ensures that US is not spent on providing advice and support to women in difficult (to say the least) circumstances who otherwise often take very dangerous steps to end their pregnancy.

Do you see why you focussing on the words "promote and provide" you were being a bit misleading as to your complete lack of care about the topic?

The Kronic 11:46 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Is Mashed Trump's newly appointed WHO secretary/gimp?

Trump is going to try and overturn Roe v. Wade next, a fact you conveniently left out. Or is that an alternative fact?

mashed in maryland 11:43 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
I don't really care, if I'm honest.

Coffee 11:40 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
Here we go...

AfM 11:39 Tue Jan 24
Re: Women are stupid.
That's a better post, mashed.

You might also be aware that the republican eternal backing of this has quite a lot to do with religion?

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: