WHO Poll
Q: Manuel Pellegrini
a. A great signing for the Club and maybe the change of direction we all need
33%
  
b. It will only be a great signing if the Board back him with decent funds
50%
  
c. This is West Ham so it will only end in farce
15%
  
d. I'm not sure about this one, I'll wait until SKY is back to hear what Gary Neville thinks, then I'll voice my opinion
3%
  



Keep dreaming 8:28 Fri Jun 29
FIFA's revolution
Apparently coming up.
Involves 32 or 48 teams in next world cup, and a new world cup for team including special invitation from top 4 clubs across the world.

More money to the top clubs, is that what football need?

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

13 Brentford Rd 9:52 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
Wasn't there 32 in the current world cup or am I missing something?

JLAP 9:51 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
When are those cunts goIng to give England another chance of hosting a tourney? The yanks are even getting a second go within 30 years where as 52 years on we are still out in the cold.

Mike Oxsaw 9:01 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
Revolution?

Suits wanting a bigger slice of the pie for themselves, that's all this is about.

cholo 8:57 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
I for one can't wait to see Vanuatu v Faroe Isles in a meaningless final group match. Roll on 2030.

Takashi Miike 8:55 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
no, it's not what football needs. 32 is enough

Trevor B 8:46 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
2026 WC will have 48 teams, 2022 WC has 32. This is old news mate.

icwhs 8:45 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
Plus. More games to watch.

Minus. More shit teams





Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: