WHO Poll
Q: 2018/19 Wolves (H)
a. At last we have a win now let's make it two, Win
b. A win against 10 men and two leagues below us is fine, but this will be much harder I'll take a point, Draw
c. Who are we kidding, a win against Wimbledon and all is rosy, forget it we're getting our arses kicked in this one, Lose
d. It's at times like these when you really do miss Love Island
e. I was all over this game until I found out it's not on the box, the broadcasting companies really don't care about us hard core fans do they, I might pop off to Thorpe Park for the day instead, obviously in my WHU shirt

Keep dreaming 8:28 Fri Jun 29
FIFA's revolution
Apparently coming up.
Involves 32 or 48 teams in next world cup, and a new world cup for team including special invitation from top 4 clubs across the world.

More money to the top clubs, is that what football need?

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

13 Brentford Rd 9:52 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
Wasn't there 32 in the current world cup or am I missing something?

JLAP 9:51 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
When are those cunts goIng to give England another chance of hosting a tourney? The yanks are even getting a second go within 30 years where as 52 years on we are still out in the cold.

Mike Oxsaw 9:01 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution

Suits wanting a bigger slice of the pie for themselves, that's all this is about.

cholo 8:57 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
I for one can't wait to see Vanuatu v Faroe Isles in a meaningless final group match. Roll on 2030.

Takashi Miike 8:55 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
no, it's not what football needs. 32 is enough

Trevor B 8:46 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
2026 WC will have 48 teams, 2022 WC has 32. This is old news mate.

icwhs 8:45 Fri Jun 29
Re: FIFA's revolution
Plus. More games to watch.

Minus. More shit teams

Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: