WHO Poll
Q:



kirok1 4:43 Mon Apr 15
Good enough for Masuaku?
If Masuaku got a six game ban for the disgusting spitting incident - which he deserved - where is the outcry about this?

https://twitter.com/torno1887/status/1117456912918962176?s=21

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

Alfs 7:31 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
Lee Trundle 6:44 Mon Apr 15

Lee Trundle 6:44 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
I know it's the cool thing these days to be offended by things like this on SOCIAL MEDIA, but I don't think he's anywhere near Hazard to warrant any kind of breakdown.

What Masuaku did was entirely different, IMO.

Fo the Communist 6:25 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
Blowing snot near a felled opponent is so leftist.

dealcanvey 6:21 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
Definitely intent there from Fabhino. Just a fucking weird thing to do in general.

ironsofcanada 6:20 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
Westham67 6:13 Mon Apr 15

A very left-wing thing to say these days - it's different when I do it.

But take this personal thing you have with me to WHOmail again, if you must. This is not an important issue but I have said my piece and don't want to spam up people's discussion of it.

Westham67 6:13 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
Thats different you try and make posters look stupid and smug with it

ironsofcanada 5:57 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
67

* blinks

?

(How times have you told me to f-off? Seriously is your memory span less than a week?).

I am sure other posters can handle it, like I do with you.

Westham67 5:50 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
You really are rude and dismissive of other posters Canada it smacks of arrogance

Far Cough 5:38 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
Hazard probably didn't even see it and anyhow he had the whole wide fucking field to himself, why do it there?

ironsofcanada 5:36 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
No one on the field cared and including Hazzard (who is not above making a meal out of nothing in the past.)

a view not from some guys TV

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D4I9dfTWwAYMXxq.jpg

I'll leave it at that.

Far Cough 5:29 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
It's still fucking dirty and it's too close to player lying down, wind could catch droplets over Hazard's face

ironsofcanada 5:19 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
I love the press coverage of this.

Headline

"Fabinho blows snot from nose inches from Hazard after injuring Chelsea star in tackle"

in the article

"Television camera angles made it look like the Liverpool midfielder was stood over Hazard as he cleared mucus from his nose."

Spot the difference.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/8862573/fabinho-snot-hazard-chelsea/

Move on boys.

Far Cough 5:18 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
That's worse than spitting, he's honking out a big bogey



Dirty Liverpool cunt

Mad Dog 5:11 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
What are you in about. That ban Salah got has stopped his antics.....

Oh

Westham67 5:07 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
Same as the Lanzini ban for diving it doesn't apply to the "Bigger" teams

zebthecat 5:05 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
Small, far away

ironsofcanada 5:02 Mon Apr 15
Re: Good enough for Masuaku?
You must have really enjoyed Lord of the Rings. (forced perspective)





Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: