AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Crapaqueta
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1515
- Been liked: 367 times
Re: Crapaqueta
He also played the most impressive pass of the entire match, the through ball to Bowen who lazily didn't bother getting onside properly so the goal was chalked off, which will have delighted you and your assist stats for Paqueta.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8186
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4757 times
- Been liked: 2548 times
Re: Crapaqueta
He certainly defended well for the Team needlessly gifting back possession to Villa in our half of the pitch that then led to Rogers 1st goal and Villas equaliser to get them back in the game just after half time. Nothing responsible and playing for the Team about that costly error showboating.
Re: Crapaqueta
Anyone who was actually there today will have appreciated the tremendous work rate of this bloke, by far our hardest working player today. You just won't see that on the telly.
He puts a shift in trying to defend as well, he's just not great at it.
Some of the risks he takes are frustrating but that's what you get from technically brilliant flair players.
He puts a shift in trying to defend as well, he's just not great at it.
Some of the risks he takes are frustrating but that's what you get from technically brilliant flair players.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1515
- Been liked: 367 times
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8186
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4757 times
- Been liked: 2548 times
Re: Crapaqueta
*Correction - He was involved in Villa’s Rogers goal by getting caught dicking about on the ball gifting it back to them
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8186
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4757 times
- Been liked: 2548 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Yet another game is fails to create an assist, his 60th consecutive match in a row and not involved in either goal. Carrying the waste of space these days.
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 2964
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 685 times
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2530
- Has liked: 219 times
- Been liked: 406 times
-
eusebiovic
- Posts: 703
- Old WHO Number: 15391
- Has liked: 1225 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: Crapaqueta
It's become a running joke with Paqueta now...He does it so often that other teams actively press and target him for that very reason.
Jack Rudoni from Coventry would be a much better replacement and he's naturally left footed to give the midfield some balance but we ain't getting anywhere near him now. Watch Palace or Brighton sign him up.
Jack Rudoni from Coventry would be a much better replacement and he's naturally left footed to give the midfield some balance but we ain't getting anywhere near him now. Watch Palace or Brighton sign him up.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1515
- Been liked: 367 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Costs us yet another goal and potentially 2 points.
Can we finally be rid of this cսnt now.
Can we finally be rid of this cսnt now.
Re: Crapaqueta
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:35fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:33Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:26Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocksYou're a bit dumb aren't you. My very point is that Paqueta didn't play in a bunch of games West Ham didn't lose.
Yep and we also didn't lose or won the previous times we played the same opposition with him in the team therefore the results didn't improve..
We didn't lose against Bournemouth but we won the previous two with him playing, see how fucking ridiculous your proof is, I'm the dumb one really
We didn't lose against Bournemouth but we won the previous two with him playing, see how fucking ridiculous your proof is, I'm the dumb one really
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1381
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 293 times
Re: Crapaqueta
fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:33Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:26Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks
You're a bit dumb aren't you. My very point is that Paqueta didn't play in a bunch of games West Ham didn't lose.
Re: Crapaqueta
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:26fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:20Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:15The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match.Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.
So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks
Again you've ignored me debunking your solid proof...
Again you've ignored me debunking your solid proof...
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1381
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 293 times
Re: Crapaqueta
fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:20Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:15The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match.
Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.
Re: Crapaqueta
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:15fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:11Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 10:58Clear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.You slaughtered us for our display at Bournemouth... We also drew there last year with him in the team.. Leicester... The worst PL team in years and you think we won because he didn't play...
We did the double over man u last season with him
Yeah solid proofThe worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.
They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1381
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 293 times
Re: Crapaqueta
fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:11Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 10:58wils wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:46Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.
But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:
Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West HamClear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.You slaughtered us for our display at Bournemouth... We also drew there last year with him in the team.. Leicester... The worst PL team in years and you think we won because he didn't play...
We did the double over man u last season with him
Yeah solid proof
The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.
Re: Crapaqueta
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 10:58wils wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:46Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.
But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:
Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West HamClear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.
You slaughtered us for our display at Bournemouth... We also drew there last year with him in the team.. Leicester... The worst PL team in years and you think we won because he didn't play...
We did the double over man u last season with him
Yeah solid proof
We did the double over man u last season with him
Yeah solid proof
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1381
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 293 times
Re: Crapaqueta
wils wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:46Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.
But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:
Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
Clear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8186
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4757 times
- Been liked: 2548 times
Re: Crapaqueta
fraser wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:29Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:22
No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension.But anyway take them away and we're possibly Wolves, so yes he isn't as good as he should be and should do better but why leave him and his contributions out when we need them?
Because I seriously question his state of mind for obvious reasons. I'm actually genuinely concerned for the bloke as he's clearly struggled and the last match he played he proved he couldn't keep it together when we can ill afford for it to happen. We lose that game scoring nothing he doesn't play the next difficult game away and we score and draw without him. I genuinely think both he and us would benefit if he was available on the bench. It would also send the right message to others that you have to earn your place back especially after how he badly reacted. It feels a bit soon to chuck him straight back in to the fold but hopefully it works out and we can beat Brighton. He's going to be back under intense pressure, let's hope he manages to cope alright.
Re: Crapaqueta
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:22fraser wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:15Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:07Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended.Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we...
Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban..
No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension.
But anyway take them away and we're possibly Wolves, so yes he isn't as good as he should be and should do better but why leave him and his contributions out when we need them?
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8186
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4757 times
- Been liked: 2548 times
Re: Crapaqueta
fraser wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:15Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:07Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended.Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we...
Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban..
No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension.
Re: Crapaqueta
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:07fraser wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:38Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:32
So out of the 18 goals we've scored so far this season, how many was his involved in passing moves resulting in goals? I can only think of 2, 1 against Burnley and another against Newcastle. Beyond that I'm struggling to think of amy others regardless of him having the last touch to assist goals.I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest...Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended.
Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we...
Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban..
Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban..
