The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 09 Dec 2024, 09:19
by Come On You Irons
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 29 Dec 2025, 09:31
by XKhammer
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑29 Dec 2025, 07:25
I think the WHO fund should donate a bag of sand to get that very important film made and annoy all the nonce enablers like sven.
All you seem to do is mention cock or nonces in every thread...zzzzzzz
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 29 Dec 2025, 08:50
by OK_Guy
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑28 Dec 2025, 22:36
how many producers, actors and actresses would contemplate making this or even taking part.
are they going to use real actors or is this going to be A.I generated (see link on YouTube, before you donate)... yes a film of this type needs to be made by real actors such is its importance.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 29 Dec 2025, 07:25
by THUNDERCLINT
I think the WHO fund should donate a bag of sand to get that very important film made and annoy all the nonce enablers like sven.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 29 Dec 2025, 05:06
by nychammer
just got back from a few days in the UK and spent some of the time in London having not been in Central London for a few years and it seemed different to me. Literally everyone working in the service industries (Hotels, Shops, restaurants etc.) seems to be European and notably eastern European. Is this some new normal? Are they doing jobs born and bred brits refuse to do?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 28 Dec 2025, 22:55
by Massive Attack
None of the Lefty luvvies, that's for sure.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 28 Dec 2025, 22:36
by Leavemyarcelona
[url]tel:[/url]
how many producers, actors and actresses would contemplate making this or even taking part.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 28 Dec 2025, 21:09
by Nutsin
Here here!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 28 Dec 2025, 01:32
by Mike Oxsaw
The straws are starting to weigh heavily on the camel again.
People won't protest (so strongly) in Winter, so expect a few more months of the Government & state surreptitiously ploughing their path through implementing their relative agendas while the people sit and watch "reality" TV and box sets.
First triggering event that coincides with a nice sunny day will set the people off.
Is that incitement?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
That cant be true, you said someone a brief with an IQ of a sponge would have got her off.
You didn't answer my question, if an iman at a mosque say used exactly the same words, but just substituted the word hotel for schools, you wouldn't see that as some sort of incitement?
How about what that Labour Councillor said? Why didn't he get a 3 stretch as well?
Yeah I completely agree with that, law needs to be blind to agendas and sides and it currently isnt, it does favour the left. doesn't change the fact what she said was incitement though
There was no incitement. There was a direct call to deportation. Which should be being enacted by law. The flippant remark towards burning the hotels was to stress how little a care for situation she has, not one to be taken literal, unlike the Labour councillor’s remark.
She was used as an example to quell the clearly growing outrage, of which Labour have absolutely no intention of actually addressing for the benefit of UK citizens.
I couldn’t care less if Keir Starmer got a terminal cancer, but that does not mean I wish it upon him or are a threat to his safety.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Out of fear of a longer sentence and mostly likely tainted legal advice.
That cant be true, you said someone a brief with an IQ of a sponge would have got her off.
You didn't answer my question, if an iman at a mosque say used exactly the same words, but just substituted the word hotel for schools, you wouldn't see that as some sort of incitement?
How about what that Labour Councillor said? Why didn't he get a 3 stretch as well?
Yeah I completely agree with that, law needs to be blind to agendas and sides and it currently isnt, it does favour the left. doesn't change the fact what she said was incitement though
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 27 Dec 2025, 20:52
by SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025, 12:59
‘Set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards’
Nothing to see there
You've edited that to change it's meaning.
Absolute last resort of the scum-bag, leftie, anti-Semite, Muslim-loving, Britain-hating cսnt that you are.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 27 Dec 2025, 17:32
by Nutsin
Bill Maher talking sense.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 27 Dec 2025, 10:38
by Massive Attack
Unlike our Lady Brady who is all fur coat and no knickers, this kinky foreign bastard is all furskin whilst wearing frilly knickers.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 27 Dec 2025, 10:32
by OK_Guy
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑27 Dec 2025, 10:03
The little shit was even invited in to Buckingham Palace at one point to hold audience with the Queen. Rumours amongst Courtiers is that he was later caught fur deep playing among underage girls with Andrew formerly known as Prince. The pictures apparently would blow your mind involving marmalade spread, the job lot the filthy fucker.
no doubt the little furry cսnt will be invited to do a BBC interview with Emily Maitlis to prove he was innocent of his grooming activities at the Palace... it's also rumoured, that he will appear on Question-Time soon, extolling the benefits for illegal-immigrants in the UK... honestly speaking, you really couldn't make this shit up.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 27 Dec 2025, 10:03
by Massive Attack
The little shit was even invited in to Buckingham Palace at one point to hold audience with the Queen. Rumours amongst Courtiers is that he was later caught fur deep playing among underage girls with Andrew formerly known as Prince. The pictures apparently would blow your mind involving marmalade spread, the job lot the filthy fucker.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Dec 2025, 05:36
I wonder how many complaints the bbc got for showing that film about the Peruvian illegal immigrant coming to London while all the Reform Christians wanted was to pretend to want peace on earth & goodwill to the all men
Bastards rubbed it in the next day by showing Paddington 2 and all
At least this illegal immigrant got his just deserts and got banged up at one point, the little furry sandwich munching, rabies-addled cսnt.
I'll have you know, that little illegal furry thing that's been stuffed more than a turkey, you could actually call it a straw-bear, was made in Whitechapel... the fake news the BBC push out just to get your sympathy, illegal immigrant?, fuck right off, just another home-made narcissist.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 27 Dec 2025, 09:15
by Massive Attack
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Dec 2025, 05:36
I wonder how many complaints the bbc got for showing that film about the Peruvian illegal immigrant coming to London while all the Reform Christians wanted was to pretend to want peace on earth & goodwill to the all men
Bastards rubbed it in the next day by showing Paddington 2 and all
At least this illegal immigrant got his just deserts and got banged up at one point, the little furry sandwich munching, rabies-addled cսnt.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Out of fear of a longer sentence and mostly likely tainted legal advice.
That cant be true, you said someone a brief with an IQ of a sponge would have got her off.
You didn't answer my question, if an iman at a mosque say used exactly the same words, but just substituted the word hotel for schools, you wouldn't see that as some sort of incitement?
How about what that Labour Councillor said? Why didn't he get a 3 stretch as well?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 27 Dec 2025, 05:36
by Fauxstralian
I wonder how many complaints the bbc got for showing that film about the Peruvian illegal immigrant coming to London while all the Reform Christians wanted was to pretend to want peace on earth & goodwill to the all men
Bastards rubbed it in the next day by showing Paddington 2 and all
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑27 Dec 2025, 01:29
Fuck me, there's some sad cunts on here, the last couple of days. Image spending Christmas ranting a load of false bollocks on the internet while raging against people who dont really affect you.
I had a lovely dinner with my family.
The true "sad cunts" are those who fall for all this Christmas shit without question, year after year.
Is this "Christmas shit" in the room with us right now? Tell us what it is about it that enrages you so?
I suspect it may well be, but it probably looks like decorations and a tree with some twinkly lights on it.
It's not even an original celebration - it was hijacked and supplanted the celebration of the Winter Solstice, which, at least was in praise of the approach of Spring and the ability to plant crops; a practical and useful calendar event.
If you're going to show "peace & good will to all men" (what about the women, don't they get any?), why not do so all year long, rather than on just one virtual signalling day in that year?
You want/need to have a fairy story dictate your life on a regular annual basis, crack on.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑27 Dec 2025, 01:29
Fuck me, there's some sad cunts on here, the last couple of days. Image spending Christmas ranting a load of false bollocks on the internet while raging against people who dont really affect you.
I had a lovely dinner with my family.
The true "sad cunts" are those who fall for all this Christmas shit without question, year after year.
Is this "Christmas shit" in the room with us right now? Tell us what it is about it that enrages you so?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 27 Dec 2025, 02:48
by Mike Oxsaw
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑27 Dec 2025, 01:29
Fuck me, there's some sad cunts on here, the last couple of days. Image spending Christmas ranting a load of false bollocks on the internet while raging against people who dont really affect you.
I had a lovely dinner with my family.
The true "sad cunts" are those who fall for all this Christmas shit without question, year after year.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 27 Dec 2025, 01:29
by One Sunny Day
Fuck me, there's some sad cunts on here, the last couple of days. Image spending Christmas ranting a load of false bollocks on the internet while raging against people who dont really affect you.
I had a lovely dinner with my family.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
lets hope all the radical hate clerics don't find out that loophole.
It's also quite ridiculous how you liberal morons alway try to associate a housewife (?) shitposting on twitter in the aftermath of 3 children being murdered to a radical hate cleric.
house wife, or hate cleric is completely irrelevant, and since you're all about following the law to the letter of course you know that don't you. I used the example because I knew you'd be a hypocrite about it. PS I'm not liberal, I'm just not a fucking cheerleader and a hypocrite when "my side" is in the wrong for once
Actually it's not irrelevant and would form a large part of the prosecution. The hate preacher would like have a large body of work to draw from when attempting to prove his intent and therefore make reasonable doubt a much higher threshold to achieve.
And you used it as an example because the intent is to use the example to demonize Connolly. It's very basic NLP, mention the words radical, hate etc in an attempt to subconsciously link them to her.
And if you're not a liberal then you must be a commie shitcunt.