AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2649
- Has liked: 222 times
- Been liked: 441 times
- Beef&Tomato
- Posts: 72
- Has liked: 21 times
- Been liked: 22 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Last 10 games we are 7th in the form table, what's difficult to understand about that?
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
BoleynGone wrote: ↑19 Mar 2026, 19:38 Vexed.
now that is dumb.
Not including the Liverpool result ah, dismissing a game to fit your agenda.
Again, we ddin't bat Brentford.the bookies agree with this as they would have paid for a draw.
if you want to fit an agenda, QPR was a draw too at full time.
Oh dear. It does include the Liverpool game as stated. Brentford was a cup game and therefore not relevant to league form. Not sure why you keep mentioning it. If it helps you to understand, the league is the only thing we can get relegated from and is the main thing being discussed on a relegation thread. But well done for spelling agenda correctly, good work.
-
BoleynGone
- Posts: 322
- Has liked: 119 times
- Been liked: 58 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Vexed.
now that is dumb.
Not including the Liverpool result ah, dismissing a game to fit your agenda.
Again, we ddin't bat Brentford.the bookies agree with this as they would have paid for a draw.
if you want to fit an agenda, QPR was a draw too at full time.
now that is dumb.
Not including the Liverpool result ah, dismissing a game to fit your agenda.
Again, we ddin't bat Brentford.the bookies agree with this as they would have paid for a draw.
if you want to fit an agenda, QPR was a draw too at full time.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4559
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 275 times
- Been liked: 1355 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Be ideal if both Palace and Forest wend through actually. Palace have got us immediately after a prospective second leg QF, and any distraction for Forest is a welcome one.
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
BoleynGone wrote: ↑19 Mar 2026, 12:06 Typical of you to have a go at the kids.
The game was a draw 2-2.
We didn't lose the game but if you want that to fit your pathectic agenda go ahead.
The kids put in a performance against a good National League team. As good as the first team against City.They had 2 players go off injured at crucial times and had to bring on 2 even younger players.
What a cսnt you are.
Some have barely played for the U21's this season and you choose to have a go at them.
What a complete and utter wanker you are.
I'll spell this out for once again.
WE SCORE AT AN AVERAGE OF 1 GOAL A GAME AND CONCEDE 1 GOAL A GAME THAT IS 1-1
For you to understnad this it's quite simple.
Villa are 4th because over the course of the season the have acheived the 4th best amount of points on the league.
West Ham are 18th because over the course of the season we have achieved the 18th most points.
By your logic the season should end now and we finish 9th.
What an idiot.
Well for all your spelling out stupidity: Over the last ten games (which is the only relevant time period) we average 1.5 goals a game and concede 1.4 goals a game - but this includes the Liverpool result that is rather an outlier. So shut your fuckin maaaaafff
-
dealcanvey
- Posts: 647
- Old WHO Number: 212132
- Has liked: 44 times
- Been liked: 132 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑19 Mar 2026, 17:26dealcanvey wrote: ↑19 Mar 2026, 17:12 Forest have benched pretty much everyone for their game tonight.Crazy, but I guess Premier League survival is the priority over winning a major European Trophy, given the choice.
Seems the case. Mental considering it’s there first time in Europe in decades. I’m not sure it gives off the right message to the players. Gives off a lot of fear.
even spurs went full strength last night.
even spurs went full strength last night.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1493
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 106 times
- Been liked: 338 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
dealcanvey wrote: ↑19 Mar 2026, 17:12 Forest have benched pretty much everyone for their game tonight.
Crazy, but I guess Premier League survival is the priority over winning a major European Trophy, given the choice.
-
Russ of the BML
- Posts: 1326
- Old WHO Number: 14551
- Has liked: 542 times
- Been liked: 524 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Sad to say this but Spurs will take a boost from last night.... They got tonked overall but they played really well and even at one point, if they had got a third, they could've turned it around. I am praying that they played that well as they weren't under pressure....And hoping that when they play Forest their arses go.
Tudor's message will clearly be reminding them that they can play that well.... Just hope it falls on deaf ears.
Either way, we need to beat Villa which is a huge task.
Tudor's message will clearly be reminding them that they can play that well.... Just hope it falls on deaf ears.
Either way, we need to beat Villa which is a huge task.
-
dealcanvey
- Posts: 647
- Old WHO Number: 212132
- Has liked: 44 times
- Been liked: 132 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Forest have benched pretty much everyone for their game tonight.
- Tomshardware
- Posts: 1376
- Old WHO Number: 266280
- Has liked: 749 times
- Been liked: 343 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Wolves have got the bit between their teeth and won't be an easy game for anyone.
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑19 Mar 2026, 14:30 BrainGone is clearly on a wind-up.
Thinks Earthy is gonna return and score on the final day of the season to keep us up. The fucker can't get a kick in the Championship.
Very strange considering we're only gonna get a point a game and go down, he's all over the place.
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2649
- Has liked: 222 times
- Been liked: 441 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
BrainGone is clearly on a wind-up.
Thinks Earthy is gonna return and score on the final day of the season to keep us up. The fucker can't get a kick in the Championship.
Thinks Earthy is gonna return and score on the final day of the season to keep us up. The fucker can't get a kick in the Championship.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4559
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 275 times
- Been liked: 1355 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
fraser wrote: ↑19 Mar 2026, 13:22El Scorchio" wrote: ↑19 Mar 2026, 12:54
I'll spell this out for once again.
WE SCORE AT AN AVERAGE OF 1 GOAL A GAME AND CONCEDE 1 GOAL A GAME THAT IS 1-1
That's a completely irrelevant stat and means/tells nothing. It doesn't in any way take into account actual results. You could measure that average over 10 games, lose two of them 5-1 and win the others 1-0 gain 24 points or vice versa and gain 6 points. It by no means whatsoever equates to one point a game.
Also there's somewhat of a gulf in quality between Man City and Borehamwood. It's not a knock on anyone to say the level the youths have been playing at although very impressive is leagues below the premier league. Those youth players the manager sees potential in/use for at this moment are getting a game. Those he doesn't are not. He's used them far more meaningfully in first team action than any other managers in recent history.Mental isn't it claiming the last 6 games aren't good enough because we've scored 7 and let in 7 and complete ignoring the points we won which is 9 and downgrading them to 6... Then saying that's a point a game so unless we improve we will only gain 8 points... But if we go along at the same pace that's 11 points and enough... Never once said we were gonna finish 9th just that we didn't have to improve on our last 6 games to get more than 8 points.
He's an absolute fucking retard
It's definitely cherry picking stats and manipulating them very selectively to fit an agenda, which I don't think really stands up to logic or scrutiny. I'll say that! I don't really understand the beef with Nuno now.
Fair enough when it wasn't going well but we've gotten 15 points from the last nine league games (while playing four of the top six sides in those nine- two of them away) along with three wins in the cup, so it's going well. And while there are always things that could have been better, to be overly critical in the face of that just seems silly. If you're dishing out pelters for what happened up to January, you have to dish out some praise for what's happened since.
Fair enough when it wasn't going well but we've gotten 15 points from the last nine league games (while playing four of the top six sides in those nine- two of them away) along with three wins in the cup, so it's going well. And while there are always things that could have been better, to be overly critical in the face of that just seems silly. If you're dishing out pelters for what happened up to January, you have to dish out some praise for what's happened since.
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Is it better for us if sp*rs win sunday or forest
i desperately want the north london cunts to go down but cant see it. Satan wouldnt allow something that good to happen in my life
a forest win would give them momentum (and 3 vital points) but keep the dream of the cunts going down a possibility
sp*rs winning would drop forest right in it, especially if we win sunday (and their goal diff is closer to ours)
Or is a point a piece the beat result for us?
i desperately want the north london cunts to go down but cant see it. Satan wouldnt allow something that good to happen in my life
a forest win would give them momentum (and 3 vital points) but keep the dream of the cunts going down a possibility
sp*rs winning would drop forest right in it, especially if we win sunday (and their goal diff is closer to ours)
Or is a point a piece the beat result for us?
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2649
- Has liked: 222 times
- Been liked: 441 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
El Scorchio" wrote: ↑19 Mar 2026, 12:54
I'll spell this out for once again.
WE SCORE AT AN AVERAGE OF 1 GOAL A GAME AND CONCEDE 1 GOAL A GAME THAT IS 1-1
That's a completely irrelevant stat and means/tells nothing. It doesn't in any way take into account actual results. You could measure that average over 10 games, lose two of them 5-1 and win the others 1-0 gain 24 points or vice versa and gain 6 points. It by no means whatsoever equates to one point a game.
Also there's somewhat of a gulf in quality between Man City and Borehamwood. It's not a knock on anyone to say the level the youths have been playing at although very impressive is leagues below the premier league. Those youth players the manager sees potential in/use for at this moment are getting a game. Those he doesn't are not. He's used them far more meaningfully in first team action than any other managers in recent history.
Mental isn't it claiming the last 6 games aren't good enough because we've scored 7 and let in 7 and complete ignoring the points we won which is 9 and downgrading them to 6... Then saying that's a point a game so unless we improve we will only gain 8 points... But if we go along at the same pace that's 11 points and enough... Never once said we were gonna finish 9th just that we didn't have to improve on our last 6 games to get more than 8 points.
He's an absolute fucking retard
He's an absolute fucking retard
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
BoleynGone wrote: ↑19 Mar 2026, 12:06 Typical of you to have a go at the kids.
The game was a draw 2-2.
We didn't lose the game but if you want that to fit your pathectic agenda go ahead.
The kids put in a performance against a good National League team. As good as the first team against City.They had 2 players go off injured at crucial times and had to bring on 2 even younger players.
What a cսnt you are.
Some have barely played for the U21's this season and you choose to have a go at them.
What a complete and utter wanker you are.
I'll spell this out for once again.
WE SCORE AT AN AVERAGE OF 1 GOAL A GAME AND CONCEDE 1 GOAL A GAME THAT IS 1-1
For you to understnad this it's quite simple.
Villa are 4th because over the course of the season the have acheived the 4th best amount of points on the league.
West Ham are 18th because over the course of the season we have achieved the 18th most points.
By your logic the season should end now and we finish 9th.
What an idiot.
No that wasn't my logic my logic is if we go along as we are we will be fine, your logic was we won't because you made up that we're going along at a point a game over the last 6 which we are not.
I'm also not having a dig at the kids just pointing out that because they do well against other kids doesn't make them better against teams that aren't kids which the result at Boreham wood proves.
The first team drew at Burton and won after extra time you said that Wilson and some others weren't good enough if they couldn't beat Burton and the kids were better but the kids couldn't beat a team far worse than Burton therefore by your logic they're worse.
I'm also not having a dig at the kids just pointing out that because they do well against other kids doesn't make them better against teams that aren't kids which the result at Boreham wood proves.
The first team drew at Burton and won after extra time you said that Wilson and some others weren't good enough if they couldn't beat Burton and the kids were better but the kids couldn't beat a team far worse than Burton therefore by your logic they're worse.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4559
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 275 times
- Been liked: 1355 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
I'll spell this out for once again.
WE SCORE AT AN AVERAGE OF 1 GOAL A GAME AND CONCEDE 1 GOAL A GAME THAT IS 1-1
That's a completely irrelevant stat and means/tells nothing. It doesn't in any way take into account actual results. You could measure that average over 10 games, lose two of them 5-1 and win the others 1-0 gain 24 points or vice versa and gain 6 points. It by no means whatsoever equates to one point a game.
Also there's somewhat of a gulf in quality between Man City and Borehamwood. It's not a knock on anyone to say the level the youths have been playing at although very impressive is leagues below the premier league. Those youth players the manager sees potential in/use for at this moment are getting a game. Those he doesn't are not. He's used them far more meaningfully in first team action than any other managers in recent history.
Also there's somewhat of a gulf in quality between Man City and Borehamwood. It's not a knock on anyone to say the level the youths have been playing at although very impressive is leagues below the premier league. Those youth players the manager sees potential in/use for at this moment are getting a game. Those he doesn't are not. He's used them far more meaningfully in first team action than any other managers in recent history.
-
Fortunes Hiding
- Posts: 90
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 32 times
-
dealcanvey
- Posts: 647
- Old WHO Number: 212132
- Has liked: 44 times
- Been liked: 132 times
