AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Attendances at the Bowl
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 1977
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 394 times
- Been liked: 937 times
Attendances at the Bowl
So much as most think he's a wind up cսnt (and he clearly revels in that) Whetstone has produced an article for Iain Dale that lays bare the real attendance figures at our 'World Class' home.
Each week the attendance given is the tickets sold figure, but the fans that turn up are quite a different thing.
You can read the article here, but in average since 23/24 season, whilst 62,400 is what is what is published most weeks, the real attendance is typically nearer to 50,000, with averages dipping below 50k this season for the games that data is available for via FOIA.
https://www.westhamtillidie.com/posts/l ... es-exposed
Just another example of the shambolic state of that stadium and the draw of the world class team the board have worked so effectively to have playing within it.
Each week the attendance given is the tickets sold figure, but the fans that turn up are quite a different thing.
You can read the article here, but in average since 23/24 season, whilst 62,400 is what is what is published most weeks, the real attendance is typically nearer to 50,000, with averages dipping below 50k this season for the games that data is available for via FOIA.
https://www.westhamtillidie.com/posts/l ... es-exposed
Just another example of the shambolic state of that stadium and the draw of the world class team the board have worked so effectively to have playing within it.
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
Not even close
At least 10 empty seats across our row and the one in front in West Lower. That's 10 of about 50, and the upper tiers are generally sparser
At least 10 empty seats across our row and the one in front in West Lower. That's 10 of about 50, and the upper tiers are generally sparser
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8319
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4833 times
- Been liked: 2587 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
A better image of how it was going to be achieved if you imagine the Chicken Run being built closer to the touchline..
It's all LIES, LIES, LIES!

It's all LIES, LIES, LIES!

- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8319
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4833 times
- Been liked: 2587 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 10:33Massive Attack" wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 10:27 Because we had already moved the pitch across in to a different Postcode towards the Rio Stand when initially redeveloping the Ground so to make room for the intended eventual Chicken Run redevelopment eating in to a bit of both the Sir Trev Stand and Bobby Moore Stand.
We didn't just ruin the excellent touching distance to the pitch away from the Chicken Run for the sake of it.
Busses were intended to pass underneath it with how they were going to rebuild it.Then no wonder the stand never got built. Would've cost a fortune.
Affordable at the time they initially wanted to go ahead with it, especially with the Premier League finances taking off more and more each season. Plus it helps when we keep selling our best players like Rio to finance such redevelopments.
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2552
- Has liked: 220 times
- Been liked: 409 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 10:27 Because we had already moved the pitch across in to a different Postcode towards the Rio Stand when initially redeveloping the Ground so to make room for the intended eventual Chicken Run redevelopment eating in to a bit of both the Sir Trev Stand and Bobby Moore Stand.
We didn't just ruin the excellent touching distance to the pitch away from the Chicken Run for the sake of it.
Busses were intended to pass underneath it with how they were going to rebuild it.
Then no wonder the stand never got built. Would've cost a fortune.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8319
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4833 times
- Been liked: 2587 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
Because we had already moved the pitch across in to a different Postcode towards the Rio Stand when initially redeveloping the Ground so to make room for the intended eventual Chicken Run redevelopment eating in to a bit of both the Sir Trev Stand and Bobby Moore Stand.
We didn't just ruin the excellent touching distance to the pitch away from the Chicken Run for the sake of it.
Busses were intended to pass underneath it with how they were going to rebuild it.
How it was before they intended to do it..

They were going to bring the new Chicken Run close up to the touchline again..

We didn't just ruin the excellent touching distance to the pitch away from the Chicken Run for the sake of it.
Busses were intended to pass underneath it with how they were going to rebuild it.
How it was before they intended to do it..

They were going to bring the new Chicken Run close up to the touchline again..

Last edited by Massive Attack on 23 Feb 2026, 10:34, edited 1 time in total.
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2552
- Has liked: 220 times
- Been liked: 409 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5315091 ... FQAw%3D%3D
Don't see how you build a bigger stand there without infringing on the right to light of the people in those blocks.
Also would've had to re-route the road, or build over it which would've been very expensive.
Don't see how you build a bigger stand there without infringing on the right to light of the people in those blocks.
Also would've had to re-route the road, or build over it which would've been very expensive.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8319
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4833 times
- Been liked: 2587 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 09:58Fauxstralian wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 09:45 Don’t really pay much attention to the upper tiers but 50k feels low
As said redeveloping the Chicken Run stand to fill in the gaps in the corners even if it was on the same footprint of the existing stand was the right answer
Obviously we’re told lies about the restrictions caused by the bus station behind
To me 45,000 to 48,000 would be an ideal size for usFilling in the corners of the Chicken Run would've yielded about a 3k increase, so hardly worth it.
And it couldn't be made any bigger due to the blocks of flats directly behind, rather than the bus garage.
Not true. They had the planning permission back in 1999 at one point but then Newham Council under that slimy Labour Jock cսnt Robin Wales got in to bed with GSB to fuck it off once they decided they wanted the Olympic Stadium instead, so the Council and Club didn't entertain permission for a 2nd time for their own invested interests.
Yet another lie peddled by the GSB regime.
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2552
- Has liked: 220 times
- Been liked: 409 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 09:45 Don’t really pay much attention to the upper tiers but 50k feels low
As said redeveloping the Chicken Run stand to fill in the gaps in the corners even if it was on the same footprint of the existing stand was the right answer
Obviously we’re told lies about the restrictions caused by the bus station behind
To me 45,000 to 48,000 would be an ideal size for us
Filling in the corners of the Chicken Run would've yielded about a 3k increase, so hardly worth it.
And it couldn't be made any bigger due to the blocks of flats directly behind, rather than the bus garage.
And it couldn't be made any bigger due to the blocks of flats directly behind, rather than the bus garage.
-
On The Ball
- Posts: 471
- Old WHO Number: 14382
- Has liked: 193 times
- Been liked: 56 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
They haven't been "doctored" at all - they just report tickets sold, which is what all Clubs do. It's misleading certainly, but they aren't "doctored".
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 4522
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 78 times
- Been liked: 654 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
Don’t really pay much attention to the upper tiers but 50k feels low
As said redeveloping the Chicken Run stand to fill in the gaps in the corners even if it was on the same footprint of the existing stand was the right answer
Obviously we’re told lies about the restrictions caused by the bus station behind
To me 45,000 to 48,000 would be an ideal size for us
As said redeveloping the Chicken Run stand to fill in the gaps in the corners even if it was on the same footprint of the existing stand was the right answer
Obviously we’re told lies about the restrictions caused by the bus station behind
To me 45,000 to 48,000 would be an ideal size for us
-
dealcanvey
- Posts: 625
- Old WHO Number: 212132
- Has liked: 43 times
- Been liked: 118 times
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8319
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4833 times
- Been liked: 2587 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
Only BS could significantly reduce our attendance whilst occupying the Shithole.
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 07:55 The stadium was always too big for us. We needed 45,000 to 50,000.
Sorry for repeating myself, but that only applies in the event they fail to build the support.
Leaving aside the abysmal stadium, of course it made sense to have the capacity for growth. They're just too useless to achieve it
Leaving aside the abysmal stadium, of course it made sense to have the capacity for growth. They're just too useless to achieve it
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 2278
- Has liked: 620 times
- Been liked: 970 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
I dunno, some people might have, I just took it as a marketing slogan, otherwise known as a load of old bollocks.
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
When people criticise The dwarf and Brady for not delivering on “world class team for a world class stadium“ it suggests the person doing it had bought into the promise in the first place. How many did?
-
Chinkey Weasel
- Posts: 45
- Has liked: 81 times
- Been liked: 21 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
......yep, you're keeping Sullivan's pockets, nicely topped up, so he's sure to walk away
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8319
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4833 times
- Been liked: 2587 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 07:55 The stadium was always too big for us. We needed 45,000 to 50,000.
We have the fanbase to fill it, like we peoved earlier on if so many weren't driven away by GSB and how they mismanaged the the Club move amongst other things.
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 2979
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 691 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
The day they signed off on selling the Boleyn was the day our soul died. We could have redeveloped the ground, 45,000 capacity, safe standing and kept the intimidating nature of our home ground intact.
We can only hope that, one day, new owners will find some land in our heartlands and build us a football stadium to bring back the real fans and rid us of the tourists who turn up and spend much of the match with their backs to the pitch taking selfies.
We can only hope that, one day, new owners will find some land in our heartlands and build us a football stadium to bring back the real fans and rid us of the tourists who turn up and spend much of the match with their backs to the pitch taking selfies.
-
Dick Shaftsbury
- Posts: 361
- Old WHO Number: 319145
- Has liked: 357 times
- Been liked: 203 times
- Tomshardware
- Posts: 1322
- Old WHO Number: 266280
- Has liked: 704 times
- Been liked: 333 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
Some games its been clearly nowhere near full, I was there on Saturday and it was pretty full. I had a bunch of Krauts sat behind me but most around me were genuine West Ham fans.
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
I think we all know the figures have been doctered since the move but, l am shocked its that much. How much longer are these Clowns that run OUR club think they are going to get away with the bull shit and lies.
Just feck off now!
Just feck off now!
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 2278
- Has liked: 620 times
- Been liked: 970 times
Re: Attendances at the Bowl
To be fair 50,000 is still a great number that some clubs would love to have?
