Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1053
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 206 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1146
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 632 times
Been liked: 587 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 15 Nov 2025, 09:53 Asylum no longer to be granted permanently apparently. And that needs to be applied retroactively to every asylum claim since it's inception.

Kweer is absolutely shitting himself.
Check their passport records. If they've returned home at any point for a trip, they're safe and can go back permanently. 
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3863
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 67 times
Been liked: 528 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

It was hard given the Tories were in power for 14 years
How did THEY get on?
only1billybonds
Posts: 2416
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 581 times
Been liked: 861 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Yet more examples of the contempt these cunts hold for us. Do they really think we wont notice that they have suddenly started playing the hard man on immigration because they have to? If they were genuine, this could have been their position ages ago.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1173
Been liked: 281 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Asylum no longer to be granted permanently apparently. And that needs to be applied retroactively to every asylum claim since it's inception.

Kweer is absolutely shitting himself.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5046
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 652 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Massive Attack" wrote: 14 Nov 2025, 13:56 Sadly sums it up..

If anyone after seeing this is now not aware of the state's priorities and where British residents' needs sit in their (the state's) pecking order, they should be now.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 6662
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3836 times
Been liked: 2013 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Sadly sums it up..

Splodder
Posts: 29
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Splodder »

I stand corrected but it took a bit of finding. I searched for "Bristol" on the BBC app home page and not a mention among the other Bristol reports.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 6662
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3836 times
Been liked: 2013 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

, wrote: 14 Nov 2025, 09:54 Splodder, I read about the Bristol grooming gang on12 November, BBC News app.

Once on an App but not on their main News channel? Interesting. 
,
Posts: 1136
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 125 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

Splodder, I read about the Bristol grooming gang on12 November, BBC News app.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3863
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 67 times
Been liked: 528 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

The usual story with foreign aid to countries with nuclear & weapons programmes is that relatively small amount of ‘aid’ is a bribe so they will buy the weapons from the UK
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 6662
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3836 times
Been liked: 2013 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Splodder wrote: 14 Nov 2025, 08:58 Didn't see the Bristol rapist gang reported anywhere on the good old unbiased Beeb!

That's because this Country clearly doesn't have an issue at all with rape gangs. You're just a racist. Now pass go and collect your 200 Britcard points.. ➡️ 🚢 
Splodder
Posts: 29
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Splodder »

Didn't see the Bristol rapist gang reported anywhere on the good old unbiased Beeb!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5575
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 488 times
Been liked: 989 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

There was a very good video, maybe on instagram, which details all the money the uk has handed out to various causes home & abroad. And yet we have a £xbn black hole that keeps changing to fit their narrative.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2416
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 581 times
Been liked: 861 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Much of politics leads to some severe head scratching for me but the one thing above all other that baffles/angers me is why are we giving aid to countries who have a ( not cheap) ongoing nuclear programme? Especially when our economy is down the shitter and getting worse by the day.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5046
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 652 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Are we still handing out (ring fenced) foreign aid to nuclear states and despots? That needs to be knocked squarely on the head and the savings used to help fill the black hole.

Same goes for renewable fuel subsidies - none to be paid until the nation's debt has been roped in, whatever the cost elsewhere/further down the line. The government, like West Ham,  has an obvious cash flow issue that needs proper management.

In fact, anything we don't actually need should be de-funded completely by the treasury until the nation is in a fit fiscal state to afford it.

Deciding what we "need" could get rather feisty, though.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1173
Been liked: 281 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

goose wrote: 14 Nov 2025, 07:09 In other news, Rachel from accounts may have changed her mind (or had it changed for her) about raising income tax.
They uploaded a new sub-routine to the Rachelbot.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1173
Been liked: 281 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

F 129 Row66" wrote: 14 Nov 2025, 05:01 Does calling ordinary people demonstrating outside migrant hotels a Nazi, qualify as hate speech? Especially when shouted by far left extremisy who themselves actually behave like Herr Hitler's brown shirts?
It's certainly slander. I think it's about time something was done about that law so it doesn't cost the price of a house to prosecute it.

In this instance present a video of said unwashed commie rabble screaming Nazi at people protecting their kids, over in minutes, guilty all day. Flat fee  500 quid for 10 minutes work.

Each commie tried separately against a class action of the victims. Bankrupt the cunts for generations.

Could even make a sport of it.

Can't afford a holiday? Hit the town centre with a common sense slogan about women's reproductive organ, wait for retarded commies, film the slander, sue, relax on a beach for a fortnight.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5575
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 488 times
Been liked: 989 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

In other news, Rachel from accounts may have changed her mind (or had it changed for her) about raising income tax.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5575
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 488 times
Been liked: 989 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 13 Nov 2025, 22:16
Every single day in 2014?
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5046
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 652 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Nutsin wrote: 13 Nov 2025, 19:28
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 13 Nov 2025, 19:16
Nutsin wrote: 13 Nov 2025, 18:58
Yes you did, you conceded that Brexit got through in spite of the States attempts to stop it. Your words not mine.

Another referendum getting through would once again prove your  theory wrong.

I do agree that the state is a problem but they are not unbeatable. History has proven that.

Change is coming you’ll see. And the state won’t be a match against the will of the people.
It was a challenge to get about half the population off their arses and vote in the Brexit referendum. Apathy in the UK (God save the Queen) has gone up an order of magnitude or two since then, as any observant resident will testify, so an ECHR referendum is more likely to go down in history as a vote with the lowest turn-out ever than delivering "the will of the people".

That's not "defeatist", that's simply reading society, which anybody can do.

Had Brexit been accepted at the time by the state, then it would have sailed through effortlessly, but "the will of the people" decided otherwise, it seems.

Your arguments get more and more "6th-formy" by the minute. The state, as I said, holds all the aces, all the power, and cannot be voted out.
If by 6 th for my you mean right, I’ll agree.

Currently the state is happy with masse immigration and the rape of the children.

Tat will change once the ECHR is removed and your entire argument will be proven wrong again.

Your argument has a lot of waffle and nonsense. It sounds like you’re arguing with yourself.
You're the one with the insane notion that the state will cede any of it's power if/when we leave the ECHR.

Don't just say "Tah (sic) will change", give us some practical examples of how and why.
F 129 Row66
Posts: 558
Has liked: 279 times
Been liked: 305 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post F 129 Row66 »

Does calling ordinary people demonstrating outside migrant hotels a Nazi, qualify as hate speech? Especially when shouted by far left extremisy who themselves actually behave like Herr Hitler's brown shirts?
Post Reply