AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1053
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 59 times
- Been liked: 206 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 1146
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 632 times
- Been liked: 587 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025, 09:53 Asylum no longer to be granted permanently apparently. And that needs to be applied retroactively to every asylum claim since it's inception.
Kweer is absolutely shitting himself.
Check their passport records. If they've returned home at any point for a trip, they're safe and can go back permanently.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3863
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 528 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
It was hard given the Tories were in power for 14 years
How did THEY get on?
How did THEY get on?
-
only1billybonds
- Posts: 2416
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 581 times
- Been liked: 861 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Yet more examples of the contempt these cunts hold for us. Do they really think we wont notice that they have suddenly started playing the hard man on immigration because they have to? If they were genuine, this could have been their position ages ago.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1173
- Been liked: 281 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Asylum no longer to be granted permanently apparently. And that needs to be applied retroactively to every asylum claim since it's inception.
Kweer is absolutely shitting himself.
Kweer is absolutely shitting himself.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5046
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 46 times
- Been liked: 652 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
If anyone after seeing this is now not aware of the state's priorities and where British residents' needs sit in their (the state's) pecking order, they should be now.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6662
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3836 times
- Been liked: 2013 times
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6662
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3836 times
- Been liked: 2013 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Once on an App but not on their main News channel? Interesting.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3863
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 528 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
The usual story with foreign aid to countries with nuclear & weapons programmes is that relatively small amount of ‘aid’ is a bribe so they will buy the weapons from the UK
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6662
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3836 times
- Been liked: 2013 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
That's because this Country clearly doesn't have an issue at all with rape gangs. You're just a racist. Now pass go and collect your 200 Britcard points..
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There was a very good video, maybe on instagram, which details all the money the uk has handed out to various causes home & abroad. And yet we have a £xbn black hole that keeps changing to fit their narrative.
-
only1billybonds
- Posts: 2416
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 581 times
- Been liked: 861 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Much of politics leads to some severe head scratching for me but the one thing above all other that baffles/angers me is why are we giving aid to countries who have a ( not cheap) ongoing nuclear programme? Especially when our economy is down the shitter and getting worse by the day.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5046
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 46 times
- Been liked: 652 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Are we still handing out (ring fenced) foreign aid to nuclear states and despots? That needs to be knocked squarely on the head and the savings used to help fill the black hole.
Same goes for renewable fuel subsidies - none to be paid until the nation's debt has been roped in, whatever the cost elsewhere/further down the line. The government, like West Ham, has an obvious cash flow issue that needs proper management.
In fact, anything we don't actually need should be de-funded completely by the treasury until the nation is in a fit fiscal state to afford it.
Deciding what we "need" could get rather feisty, though.
Same goes for renewable fuel subsidies - none to be paid until the nation's debt has been roped in, whatever the cost elsewhere/further down the line. The government, like West Ham, has an obvious cash flow issue that needs proper management.
In fact, anything we don't actually need should be de-funded completely by the treasury until the nation is in a fit fiscal state to afford it.
Deciding what we "need" could get rather feisty, though.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1173
- Been liked: 281 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
They uploaded a new sub-routine to the Rachelbot.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1173
- Been liked: 281 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
F 129 Row66" wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025, 05:01 Does calling ordinary people demonstrating outside migrant hotels a Nazi, qualify as hate speech? Especially when shouted by far left extremisy who themselves actually behave like Herr Hitler's brown shirts?
It's certainly slander. I think it's about time something was done about that law so it doesn't cost the price of a house to prosecute it.
In this instance present a video of said unwashed commie rabble screaming Nazi at people protecting their kids, over in minutes, guilty all day. Flat fee 500 quid for 10 minutes work.
Each commie tried separately against a class action of the victims. Bankrupt the cunts for generations.
Could even make a sport of it.
Can't afford a holiday? Hit the town centre with a common sense slogan about women's reproductive organ, wait for retarded commies, film the slander, sue, relax on a beach for a fortnight.
In this instance present a video of said unwashed commie rabble screaming Nazi at people protecting their kids, over in minutes, guilty all day. Flat fee 500 quid for 10 minutes work.
Each commie tried separately against a class action of the victims. Bankrupt the cunts for generations.
Could even make a sport of it.
Can't afford a holiday? Hit the town centre with a common sense slogan about women's reproductive organ, wait for retarded commies, film the slander, sue, relax on a beach for a fortnight.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5046
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 46 times
- Been liked: 652 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 19:28Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 19:16Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:58Yes you did, you conceded that Brexit got through in spite of the States attempts to stop it. Your words not mine.
Another referendum getting through would once again prove your theory wrong.
I do agree that the state is a problem but they are not unbeatable. History has proven that.
Change is coming you’ll see. And the state won’t be a match against the will of the people.It was a challenge to get about half the population off their arses and vote in the Brexit referendum. Apathy in the UK (God save the Queen) has gone up an order of magnitude or two since then, as any observant resident will testify, so an ECHR referendum is more likely to go down in history as a vote with the lowest turn-out ever than delivering "the will of the people".
That's not "defeatist", that's simply reading society, which anybody can do.
Had Brexit been accepted at the time by the state, then it would have sailed through effortlessly, but "the will of the people" decided otherwise, it seems.
Your arguments get more and more "6th-formy" by the minute. The state, as I said, holds all the aces, all the power, and cannot be voted out.If by 6 th for my you mean right, I’ll agree.
Currently the state is happy with masse immigration and the rape of the children.
Tat will change once the ECHR is removed and your entire argument will be proven wrong again.
Your argument has a lot of waffle and nonsense. It sounds like you’re arguing with yourself.
You're the one with the insane notion that the state will cede any of it's power if/when we leave the ECHR.
Don't just say "Tah (sic) will change", give us some practical examples of how and why.
Don't just say "Tah (sic) will change", give us some practical examples of how and why.
-
F 129 Row66
- Posts: 558
- Has liked: 279 times
- Been liked: 305 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Does calling ordinary people demonstrating outside migrant hotels a Nazi, qualify as hate speech? Especially when shouted by far left extremisy who themselves actually behave like Herr Hitler's brown shirts?