The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:40goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:37Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 17:37 The bloke's judgement and decisiveness in foreign military policy is outstanding. Not just for the sake of his own Country but also for the sake of the wider world. This is where he is most impressive. The history books on that score will judge him extremely favourably over the course of his two terms. The World will be in a much safer place once he's finished his 2nd term for years to come.I reckon George bush thought the same thing.
That Berks involvement in the middle east doesn't come close to how Trump has managed it.
XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Mar 2026, 00:57goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:15Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:05
I personally didn't and many like me agreed at the time. What was it, an estimated million or so that marched in London. The difference with that and Iran is not only their 50 year war waged on the western world and in the middle east by terrorist proxy but also they didn't ramp up nuclear capability to over 60% for no other reason than to use it as a weapon, they only need 3% enrichment for domestic energy use only. That shit back in Iraq under Hussain was clearly (to me) sexed up to fuck back then to justify that campaign.Everything was clear long after the invasion had started.
Everyone thought removing the taliban was the right thing to do at the time as well.
The US intelligence suggested last year that Iran had been set back decades in their quest for nuclear weapons. Did they lie?
If it’s about nuclear capability then why aren’t they bombing North Korea?
History won’t be judging these actions on what happens today, it’s the next month and what follows on.North Korea wouldn't dare use a nuke as it would be the finish of them
The mad mullahs of Iran would use a nuke as their thinking is completely different and welcome death with 72 virgins waiting for each nutter
They have openly said they would destroy Israel
Going on any Free Palestinian marches goosestep?
goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:15Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:05
I personally didn't and many like me agreed at the time. What was it, an estimated million or so that marched in London. The difference with that and Iran is not only their 50 year war waged on the western world and in the middle east by terrorist proxy but also they didn't ramp up nuclear capability to over 60% for no other reason than to use it as a weapon, they only need 3% enrichment for domestic energy use only. That shit back in Iraq under Hussain was clearly (to me) sexed up to fuck back then to justify that campaign.Everything was clear long after the invasion had started.
Everyone thought removing the taliban was the right thing to do at the time as well.
The US intelligence suggested last year that Iran had been set back decades in their quest for nuclear weapons. Did they lie?
If it’s about nuclear capability then why aren’t they bombing North Korea?
History won’t be judging these actions on what happens today, it’s the next month and what follows on.
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 22:37goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 22:17Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 22:15 The IRGC have been saying it themselves they mistakingly hit it. The Agency commented on initial reports.No they haven’t.
So who did it, US or Israel?
goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 22:17Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 22:15 The IRGC have been saying it themselves they mistakingly hit it. The Agency commented on initial reports.No they haven’t.
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 22:15 The IRGC have been saying it themselves they mistakingly hit it. The Agency commented on initial reports.
goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:43Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:38goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:15Everything was clear long after the invasion had started.
Everyone thought removing the taliban was the right thing to do at the time as well.
The US intelligence suggested last year that Iran had been set back decades in their quest for nuclear weapons. Did they lie?
If it’s about nuclear capability then why aren’t they bombing North Korea?
1 Regime at a time ya war hawk!Although Trump does have an excellent relationship with Jong-Un so we await what happens with that.
And Iran chose to continue on with their nuclear enrichment program ambitions after last June refusing to play ball with the Regime making it clear they wish to attack America.
As for smashing Irans forces being wiped off the map so far in under 3 days alongside the IDF:
- 48 top Commanders killed including Top cսnt Khamenei
- 10 Navy Ships
- Military Headquarters
- Over 1200 targetted sites
- Hezzbollah top intelligence Official and key sites in Lebanon
Well ahead of schedule not expecting to be that successful although under Trump they do have previous for successful missions involving Midnight Hammer and taking out Irans Major Gen Soleimani back in 2020 all.
Keep up the great work.Don't forget the school they blew to bits as well.
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:38goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:15Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:05
I personally didn't and many like me agreed at the time. What was it, an estimated million or so that marched in London. The difference with that and Iran is not only their 50 year war waged on the western world and in the middle east by terrorist proxy but also they didn't ramp up nuclear capability to over 60% for no other reason than to use it as a weapon, they only need 3% enrichment for domestic energy use only. That shit back in Iraq under Hussain was clearly (to me) sexed up to fuck back then to justify that campaign.Everything was clear long after the invasion had started.
Everyone thought removing the taliban was the right thing to do at the time as well.
The US intelligence suggested last year that Iran had been set back decades in their quest for nuclear weapons. Did they lie?
If it’s about nuclear capability then why aren’t they bombing North Korea?
1 Regime at a time ya war hawk!
And Iran chose to continue on with their nuclear enrichment program ambitions after last June refusing to play ball with the Regime making it clear they wish to attack America.
As for smashing Irans forces being wiped off the map so far in under 3 days alongside the IDF:
- 48 top Commanders killed including Top cսnt Khamenei
- 10 Navy Ships
- Military Headquarters
- Over 1200 targetted sites
- Hezzbollah top intelligence Official and key sites in Lebanon
Well ahead of schedule not expecting to be that successful although under Trump they do have previous for successful missions involving Midnight Hammer and taking out Irans Major Gen Soleimani back in 2020 all.
Keep up the great work.
goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:15Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:05
I personally didn't and many like me agreed at the time. What was it, an estimated million or so that marched in London. The difference with that and Iran is not only their 50 year war waged on the western world and in the middle east by terrorist proxy but also they didn't ramp up nuclear capability to over 60% for no other reason than to use it as a weapon, they only need 3% enrichment for domestic energy use only. That shit back in Iraq under Hussain was clearly (to me) sexed up to fuck back then to justify that campaign.Everything was clear long after the invasion had started.
Everyone thought removing the taliban was the right thing to do at the time as well.
The US intelligence suggested last year that Iran had been set back decades in their quest for nuclear weapons. Did they lie?
If it’s about nuclear capability then why aren’t they bombing North Korea?
Although Trump does have an excellent relationship with Jong-Un so we await what happens with that. 
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:05goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:55Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:40
That Berks involvement in the middle east doesn't come close to how Trump has managed it.But at the time everyone believed it was the right thing to do, history tells a different story. So how history views this war remains to be seen.
I personally didn't and many like me agreed at the time. What was it, an estimated million or so that marched in London. The difference with that and Iran is not only their 50 year war waged on the western world and in the middle east by terrorist proxy but also they didn't ramp up nuclear capability to over 60% for no other reason than to use it as a weapon, they only need 3% enrichment for domestic energy use only. That shit back in Iraq under Hussain was clearly (to me) sexed up to fuck back then to justify that campaign.
goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:55Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:40
That Berks involvement in the middle east doesn't come close to how Trump has managed it.But at the time everyone believed it was the right thing to do, history tells a different story. So how history views this war remains to be seen.
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:40goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:37Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 17:37 The bloke's judgement and decisiveness in foreign military policy is outstanding. Not just for the sake of his own Country but also for the sake of the wider world. This is where he is most impressive. The history books on that score will judge him extremely favourably over the course of his two terms. The World will be in a much safer place once he's finished his 2nd term for years to come.I reckon George bush thought the same thing.
That Berks involvement in the middle east doesn't come close to how Trump has managed it.
goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:37Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 17:37 The bloke's judgement and decisiveness in foreign military policy is outstanding. Not just for the sake of his own Country but also for the sake of the wider world. This is where he is most impressive. The history books on that score will judge him extremely favourably over the course of his two terms. The World will be in a much safer place once he's finished his 2nd term for years to come.I reckon George bush thought the same thing.