Congratulations, you have just met Davidson the Tourettes legend. Comedy timing and able to get away with it is off the scale.
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 02 Mar 2026, 23:37
by Monsieur merde de cheval
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 10:04
There are no winners here. John can't help it and was absolutely mortified he yelled that word out. Poor guy left the awards half way through. On the other hand, you don't get to tell black people how they should feel when they have that word yelled at them. Foxx is a proper dick head, though. If only there was a Bafta winning film about the condition he could watch before spouting his ignorant shit about it. I see the usual racist cunts on here are exposing themself by finding that word funny.
Blacks are tiresome... I have 5 decades of experience of black culture in England .
I have never had any interest in them and actively avoid them .
I wouldn't decide to live in Jamaica.. give it large and then complain how hard done by I am in my shack..
because I'm not Jamaican
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 01 Mar 2026, 10:27
by Takashi Miike
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 10:04
There are no winners here. John can't help it and was absolutely mortified he yelled that word out. Poor guy left the awards half way through. On the other hand, you don't get to tell black people how they should feel when they have that word yelled at them. Foxx is a proper dick head, though. If only there was a Bafta winning film about the condition he could watch before spouting his ignorant shit about it. I see the usual racist cunts on here are exposing themself by finding that word funny.
but, and it's a big but, the most offended by this non story have been self loathing 'white' leftists
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 01 Mar 2026, 10:04
by One Sunny Day
There are no winners here. John can't help it and was absolutely mortified he yelled that word out. Poor guy left the awards half way through. On the other hand, you don't get to tell black people how they should feel when they have that word yelled at them. Foxx is a proper dick head, though. If only there was a Bafta winning film about the condition he could watch before spouting his ignorant shit about it. I see the usual racist cunts on here are exposing themself by finding that word funny.
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 01 Mar 2026, 02:00
by F 129 Row66
I vaguely remember a tin of Nigger Brown Kiwi shoe polish in our shoe box probably in the 50s. In those says we used to polish shoes rather than just wipe them with a damp cloth.
In Thailand they had a toothpste called Darkie Toothpaste, it had been changed to Darlie Toothpaste when I was there.
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 26 Feb 2026, 08:18
by Fauxstralian
After the Glastonbury debacle you’d think the bbc would be on high alert against broadcasting offensive material
If it’s true that an audience microphone was placed next to the Tourette’s bloke that’s just mental
Must have known with him there & the film being honoured that this was a real risk
Often think the bbc have too many staff and no one is responsible
I see they are trying to save some money at the World Cup by broadcasting some early games from the UK
The usual process is a massive panel goes & they then have new reporters standing outside stadia reporting that ‘there is a game in there tonight’
With another reporter interviewing them about this massive revelation
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 25 Feb 2026, 20:02
by Massive Attack
As intended..
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 25 Feb 2026, 19:54
by Far Cough UKunt
Davidson has said the BBC should have "worked harder to prevent anything that I said" at the event from being broadcast, and questioned why he was seated near a microphone.He told Variety:, external "There was a microphone just in front of me, and with hindsight I have to question whether this was wise, so close to where I was seated, knowing I would tic."
They even put a fucking microphone near him.
ag ag ag
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 25 Feb 2026, 12:39
by BRANDED
Last post
Tourettes quiz night
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 25 Feb 2026, 09:38
by Far Cough UKunt
BBC said they should have bleeped the cսnt but you can take that with a grain of fucking salt.
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 25 Feb 2026, 09:36
by BRANDED
This is just click baiting. someone always is stupid enough to rise to the bait.
Everyone knew he could offend anyone. That’s the whole point of the film.
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 13:41
Could have shouted
COCK SUCKER
cսnt or
TOTTENHAM
But it was something very specific
If it was a women he probably would have shouted "cսnt" or "whore" as that's how it works. It's not random, it is specific
We have a lad who trains at our gym, he has terrible tourettes, when we run, he shouts (well we find it hilarious) awful words at people as we run past them. He can't help it at all and the more nervous he gets the worse it gets. He also has the ticks and jumps as well.
This is it...
For our generation , dark humour was normal, everyone was fair game...Including ourselves.
We've lost that a while back.
Anyone else have a heavy feeling when you leave the house in the morning ...who will I offend today?
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 25 Feb 2026, 00:05
by Monsieur merde de cheval
If John was black and shouted out HONKY cսnt..?
Would YOU be bothered ?
Just another case of the BBC sending themselves round the bend.
Yes, let's be inclusive and invite John..
The outrage towards John is boringly predictable by the chippy blacks.
They'll always be looking to be offended....it's what they do best.
Fuck them ...
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 19:21
by Sydney_Iron
Well, some have decided the bloke is a racist and this is all a cover/excuse?
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 12:25
by WHU(Exeter)
Apparently there was a two hour delay in broadcasting that they had to edit anything?
another shambles from the BBC, who this morning announced not just once, but twice, that chocolate is an essential food item.
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 09:40
by zico
Russ of the BML" wrote: ↑24 Feb 2026, 08:51
I mean, for me, the most ironic thing about all of this that the bloody film "I Swear" which, guess what, is all about Tourette's and won awards that night. And then that precious prick Jamie Foxx gets up on his high horse with his massive chip starts saying it was deliberate. What an absolute cսnt. Go and watch the film that was being awarded you fucking retard.
And that's not Tourette's.
This. . . Like you say. Invited because of his film to spread awareness, film is successful, wins an award, BAFTA pre warn people about possible language. So what on earth would he have to gain by shouting something deliberately?! Not just Jamie Foxx either, that irritating Narinder Kaur and the quite dislikeable (that's putting it mildly) Dr Shola what's her name are doing their usual grifting bollocks. They both live to pounce on stories like this, wish tv programmer would stop giving them airtime.
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 09:37
by yngwies Cat
Fair few Touretts sufferers near my seat at West Ham.
Fair to say 'You cսnt' seems to be the give away..
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 09:29
by Massive Attack
Being called a Sp*rs fan is the ultimate offensive term to call anyone on the top of the totem poll, so gays and blacks pale into insignificance further down by comparison. Sorry to disappoint Jamie and any woolly woofters that read this.
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 08:54
by only1billybonds
ED.
I think they call it 'the totem pole of offense.
Think the gays are about halfway down so a little homophobia is acceptable but racism of any kind is punishable by death.
Our friend Sven loses lib points on account of his constant homophobia so I'm guessing this makes him a plastic liberal?
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 08:51
by Russ of the BML
I mean, for me, the most ironic thing about all of this that the bloody film "I Swear" which, guess what, is all about Tourette's and won awards that night. And then that precious prick Jamie Foxx gets up on his high horse with his massive chip starts saying it was deliberate. What an absolute cսnt. Go and watch the film that was being awarded you fucking retard.
And that's not Tourette's.
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 08:46
by Russ of the BML
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑24 Feb 2026, 08:34
I don’t think I was offended
Was just trying to understand Tourette’s and why THAT word would come out when faced with two black men on stage
My understanding was that Tourette’s involved random swear words often with repeated phrases
It's an involuntary verbal action from mental notes. So two black men standing there. In our mind, we subconsciously recognise that they are black. But it doesn't become an actual physical thought that is prevalent within our mind that we actively make note of. Torrettes sufferers go three steps further. The fact they are black becomes a physical thought, it then reverts to verbal statement, but inadvertantly be derogatory. This happens in milliseconds.
So, another good example, and common for Tourettes sufferers is people who are larger than average. So, at work, many years ago, we had a Tourettes sufferer. His biggest issue was this as he would be in the company of a larger person, and just say "Fat cսnt". So he has subconsciously recognised they are fat, its become a physcial thought, moved to verbal statement but the derogatory. He said to me once it would be bad, but not as bad, if it just came out "Your fat". But he said Tourettes is evil nd nasty and always takes it to the lowest and most derogatory term. It happens in a millisecond and its said and out there.
His other issues were Ginger cսnt, smelly cսnt (B.O.) and he called an obviously gay man a "bent poof" once.
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 08:44
by BRANDED
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑24 Feb 2026, 08:34
I don’t think I was offended
Was just trying to understand Tourette’s and why THAT word would come out when faced with two black men on stage
My understanding was that Tourette’s involved random swear words often with repeated phrases
You cum on WHO to understand Tourettes?
you’re both gay and woke son
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 08:34
by Fauxstralian
I don’t think I was offended
Was just trying to understand Tourette’s and why THAT word would come out when faced with two black men on stage
My understanding was that Tourette’s involved random swear words often with repeated phrases
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 08:15
by Eerie Decent
Sven, I think we can all accept that it's an offensive word. We can also all agree that you have been regularly homophobic on here, which a lot of gay people would find offensive. That doesn't stop you though.
So why are you so up in arms about this offensive word now? What's the difference?
Re: BAFTA faux outrage
Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 06:34
by Fauxstralian
Come on you irons (aka Cum on your mother)
No one likes me!
ha ha ha . What a melt
We can’t all be as popular and such a beloved figure as yourself
Thanks for the encouragement to carry on
