Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Contract for New Manager

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
northbankboy68
Posts: 299
Old WHO Number: 17239
Has liked: 66 times
Been liked: 38 times

Contract for New Manager

Post northbankboy68 »

After the fiasco of the contracts given to Pellegrini, Lopetegui and Potter would anyone like to bet on Sullivan spending a couple of grand on getting a fit for purpose contract for Potter's replacement that includes a break clause for piss poor results and remuneration based on success?  Nah - I think he'll spaff more millions up the wall.  Businessman, my arse.
Russ of the BML
Posts: 1176
Old WHO Number: 14551
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 430 times

Re: Contract for New Manager

Post Russ of the BML »

One of West Ham's biggest problems under Sullivan is that he is generally always looking for a new manager because we are in the shit. Thus giving the incoming bloke the upper hand. One of Sulli's many failures is to have never enhanced the brand of 'West Ham' and so we are seen by numerous managers as them doing us a favour. Nuno will be no different.

Had Sullivan done his job properly and instilled a vision, style and ethos way back when he came in, then we would be always searching for a type of manager / coach. That way, you can calculate your compensation / salary costs more efficiently. As it stands, we are a beggar sitting in the road with our cap held out. 

Again, each failure leads back to one culprit. 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5139
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 438 times
Been liked: 907 times

Re: Contract for New Manager

Post goose »

I would just write WIN SOME FUCKING GAMES at the top.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 1335
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 284 times
Been liked: 620 times

Re: Contract for New Manager

Post stubbo-admin »

Alfs wrote: 22 Sep 2025, 22:11
stubbo-admin wrote: 22 Sep 2025, 21:48 I think part of the problem is manager's generally know they don't have to take those contracts.

I mean, we should be thinking:
  • 3 year contract
  • Option to sack for nothing if in bottom 3 with ten games to go 25/26 (last role of dice)
  • Option to sack for nothing if relegated
  • Option to sack for 6 months pay if in bottom 5 at Xmas 25/26
  • Option to sack for 6 months pay if in bottom 7 at End of Season 25/26
  • Buy out clause of 15m if any club in the top 10 at time of asking seeks to hire

 
All well and good in theory but you won't attract the best talent with such clauses, unless all clubs signed up to the same paradigm.
Totally agree. That was kind of the point I was making. Something like should be the norm...protect the club, but more than achievable for a manager with self belief.

But the reality is most managers go into these jobs more than likely salivating at the payday to come. There is no real fear of failure.

And as much as the OP says about the contract, the managers will reject anything that looks like this because they know they'll get a deal elsewhere without the risk to their ability to build up some generational wealth.

Take Nuno....apparently wants 100k per week on a 3 year gig. 15m+ across his contract. 

What other job anywhere rewards failure quite so highly than contracts in football?
Alfs
Posts: 977
Old WHO Number: 12872
Has liked: 81 times
Been liked: 180 times

Re: Contract for New Manager

Post Alfs »

stubbo-admin wrote: 22 Sep 2025, 21:48 I think part of the problem is manager's generally know they don't have to take those contracts.

I mean, we should be thinking:
  • 3 year contract
  • Option to sack for nothing if in bottom 3 with ten games to go 25/26 (last role of dice)
  • Option to sack for nothing if relegated
  • Option to sack for 6 months pay if in bottom 5 at Xmas 25/26
  • Option to sack for 6 months pay if in bottom 7 at End of Season 25/26
  • Buy out clause of 15m if any club in the top 10 at time of asking seeks to hire
 
All well and good in theory but you won't attract the best talent with such clauses, unless all clubs signed up to the same paradigm.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 1335
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 284 times
Been liked: 620 times

Re: Contract for New Manager

Post stubbo-admin »

I think part of the problem is manager's generally know they don't have to take those contracts.

I mean, we should be thinking:
  • 3 year contract
  • Option to sack for nothing if in bottom 3 with ten games to go 25/26 (last role of dice)
  • Option to sack for nothing if relegated
  • Option to sack for 6 months pay if in bottom 5 at Xmas 25/26
  • Option to sack for 6 months pay if in bottom 7 at End of Season 25/26
  • Buy out clause of 15m if any club in the top 10 at time of asking seeks to hire
Or something like that...all emminently achievable for a manager of any real substance amd protects the club.

But the reality is a guy like Nuno knows he doesn't need to take on the risk...and you can bet they LUURRRVVVEE the payout for failure which is frankly baked in.
northbankboy68
Posts: 299
Old WHO Number: 17239
Has liked: 66 times
Been liked: 38 times

Re: Contract for New Manager

Post northbankboy68 »

On The Ball" wrote: 22 Sep 2025, 21:19 Why do you describe the contracts as a "fiasco"? What do you know of them?
Last time I looked Potter is still our manager and being paid in spite of the worst win rate in living memory.  Good luck with working stuff out.
On The Ball
Posts: 436
Old WHO Number: 14382
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Contract for New Manager

Post On The Ball »

Why do you describe the contracts as a "fiasco"? What do you know of them?
Post Reply