Great timing we are staying a protest march tomorrow then. Our once great Club that used to represent so much good is now captured.
Kieran Fox is a Gooner by the way.
Fucking Club is rotten from top to bottom.
LEST WE FORGET
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:52MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:50Unless of course the original post is proven to be true.Some players in the U21s tonight were not wearing a poppy.
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: ↑08 Nov 2025, 08:00 So is this confirmed as fake news yet ?
You have to question the motives of those sticking this kind of story out there and also the timing of it
To agitate and hijack the march maybe and turn the narrative into something other than what it is ?
This is all about true West ham fans showing their feelings highlighting the issues that exist and trying to improve things for us and future generations.
We don't need supposedly outraged outsiders getting involved..
honky cat" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 22:46 This poppies on shirts has only been a thing since 2012 anyway.
If its left to the players to decide, i think you're all going to be disappointed. And they are not going to want division in the team over this.
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 22:03Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 22:00
Again, it should be made compulsory as it was before the change. This is the Clubs decision. They should be leading, not pandering to woke bollocks.What change?
Mate, let's agree to disagree on this one, eh?
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 22:00
Again, it should be made compulsory as it was before the change. This is the Clubs decision. They should be leading, not pandering to woke bollocks.
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:56Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:52MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:50Unless of course the original post is proven to be true.
Some players in the U21s tonight were not wearing a poppy.As I've said, that's the players choice.
Not neccesarily the decision of the club, because as you say, some players are not wearing one which indicates that others are. So, not dictated by the club.
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:52MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:50Unless of course the original post is proven to be true.Some players in the U21s tonight were not wearing a poppy.
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:50Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:34MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:17And that's their prerogative fella.
As said, I don't agree with their choice, but this doesn't neccesarily make it the clubs fault.
It absolutely is the Clubs fault ....Unless of course the original post is proven to be true.
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:34MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:17Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:12He wasn't the only one. Other less known players like Landers and Briggs also weren't wearing one.And that's their prerogative fella.
As said, I don't agree with their choice, but this doesn't neccesarily make it the clubs fault.
It absolutely is the Clubs fault ....
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:17Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:12He wasn't the only one. Other less known players like Landers and Briggs also weren't wearing one.And that's their prerogative fella.
As said, I don't agree with their choice, but this doesn't neccesarily make it the clubs fault.

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 21:12He wasn't the only one. Other less known players like Landers and Briggs also weren't wearing one.
honky cat" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 20:20Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 20:16MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025, 20:10 No reason to disbelieve the original post as have no proof otherwise, but am calling ABSOLUTE BOLLOCKS on this one.
Hope I'm right. Although the jizz-midget is probably targetting the ethnic shekel now, as it's obvious now is all lost for the indigenous population of our country, irrespective of this 'story'.Yes he's in the IRA