West Ham Online

"Sport Bible New report on Lucas Paqueta's spot-fixing charges reveals how much of next season West Ham star can play There has been an update on Paqueta's case. Alex Brotherton Lucas Paqueta will be free to play for West Ham for most of next season despite facing spot-fixing charges. Paqueta has been charged by the Football Association with four separate instances of spot-fixing. The 28-year-old stands accused of deliberately getting himself booked during four Premier League matches. It is one of the most serious cases of spot-fixing involving a top-flight player in England, and could land Paqueta with a lengthy ban. However, the Brazil international can continue to play until the disciplinary process has been completed. According to The Times, the outcome of the process could be delayed until the end of the 2024-25 season or beyond. That is due to the complexity of the case; Paqueta's lawyers say it will take many months to secure all the witness statements and relevant information they need for their defence. That's because the case spans three countries - England, Brazil and Spain - and involves a large number of people. The charges allege that Paqueta got himself booked during matches against Leicester City, Aston Villa, Leeds United and Bournemouth over the past two seasons so that “one or more persons” could profit financially. The investigation that preceded the charges took eight months. In September 2023, Brazilian outlet Globo reported that suspicious gambling patterns were identified in Brazil relating to Paqueta being booked against Aston Villa in March that year. The bets were reportedly made using West Ham's shirt sponsor Betway, via accounts belonging to people linked to Paqueta. The FA initially gave the player until June 3 to respond to the charges, but his lawyers were granted an extension. English football's governing body has refused to put a timescale on the case. Paqueta has been linked with a move to Brazilian giants Flamengo this summer, but this latest development will give encouragement to new West Ham boss Julen Lopetegui that he can use the midfielderthis season."

stubbo-admin wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 21:41 Full non-paywall article here:

https://archive.ph/yrLVa

Full non-paywall article here:

https://archive.ph/yrLVa

May not have been announced yet but I wonder if they have bothered to tell Paqueta? 

Otjerwise seems a pretty cunty thing to do, say it will be announced and then say fuck all!

Mind you it’s been a farce from the beginning, so won’t surprise me that when they said “today” that could mean any day in the future i mean how many times have they said the verdict is imminent or will be known shortly, fucking joke init

I don’t think releasing the verdict an hour after the Women’s Euro final if England win is a bad call 

There’s no way Paqueta is guilty and remained employed by West Ham, the idea he was dishing out free money and didn’t include Sullivan would’ve had him sacked on the spot 

So, the FA investigation was ongoing for 8 months before they charged him, and they’ve left him and us hanging for how long? Fucking disgraceful and the least they owe everyone is to announce the decision at the very earliest opportunity, they know already what they’ve decided and probably have for some time. FA looking as corrupt as the BBC.
Any other owners than our corrupt cunts would definitely be nipping at their bollocks like a starved Jack Russell, but Sullivan doesn’t like attention drawn to him.

Are people really naïve enough to believe that non-entities on sites that rely on clicks to make money have any inside information from the FA?

Latest news is that there is no news.

This news was never being announce before Monday. If it's going to make the FA look silly. Then they are going to try and bury it after Sunday's Euro Final. By which time everyone (apart from West Ham.) would be saying how great they are.

He's out in the States on the tour?
If guilty, Trump will cancel his visa and whisk him off to that supermax prison in el salvador.

Never a dull moment with the Hammers.
 

stubbo-admin wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 17:18 Who knows.  There's talk that if it's bad news the Club will get some kid of amnesty over the release of the information publicly, to deal with it, so if they're due to find out today, and it's not swiftly released....that sounds like bad news to me.

Obviously the Club shouldn't have briefed their stooges about this regardless unless they knew a positive outcome was coming.

1. He knows (KNOWS) that the club can maintain PL status next season without him, or,
2. He might just get his mo-jo back and inspire the club to set off on a couple of cash-flow hostile cup runs.

Who knows.  There's talk that if it's bad news the Club will get some kid of amnesty over the release of the information publicly, to deal with it, so if they're due to find out today, and it's not swiftly released....that sounds like bad news to me.

Obviously the Club shouldn't have briefed their stooges about this regardless unless they knew a positive outcome was coming.

Alfs wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 17:02

stubbo-admin wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 16:22 ExWhu also posted it on Patreon, and knowing how touchy he is about being called out as 'wrong' on things, expect it's legit info.

Surely they would have announced it by now, if there's any truth in the statement.

 

stubbo-admin wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 16:22 ExWhu also posted it on Patreon, and knowing how touchy he is about being called out as 'wrong' on things, expect it's legit info.

ExWhu also posted it on Patreon, and knowing how touchy he is about being called out as 'wrong' on things, expect it's legit info.

Maverick180180 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 15:25 Having now realised that the only source claiming the verdict is today has come from Claret and Hugh I’m expecting to hear jack shit 

Having now realised that the only source claiming the verdict is today has come from Claret and Hugh I’m expecting to hear jack shit 

I’m expecting the verdict to be announced at 16:59 cos these tossers love dragging it out for maximum effect 

Maverick180180 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 11:48 Would love to know who this impartial panel is

my money would be on Hackett, McCabe and Dean

If they find him guilty, it will keep Gaza/Trump out of the headlines for weeks.

Not guilty and it probably won't even register on the internet.

Would love to know who this impartial panel is

my money would be on Hackett, McCabe and Dean

Guaranteed "Late arriving evidence" that needs investigating further.

Don’t think it can be now