Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Graham Potter

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
User avatar
stubbo
Posts: 615
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 176 times

Potter Graham Potter

Post stubbo »

https://www.whufc.com/news/graham-potte ... head-coach

​​​​​​In the past he's favoured a 3-4-3 formation...hard to see how we can do that currently with only 3 senior CBs, one of whom is injured. He's also played wingers (Solly March as an example) in the wing back roles.

Typically when a 3-4-3 gets announced on a match day the manager is immediately described as being too negative, too cautious etc. I guess it depends on the composition of the 4.

He's given young players chances...hopefully that continues at West Ham.

Welcome Graham.
 
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Takashi Miike »

nychammer wrote: 15 Feb 2025, 18:09 Give the man a fucking chance. Anyone is going to struggle to come in and turn that ageing slow squad around and make them contenders for anything again. A lot of damage has been done with sub par expensive signings, competing influence over signing players and leaving gaping holes in the squad unaddressed.

There were positives today despite that poor start. He made HT changes and seems amenable to giving youth a chance. We need to give Potter the summer window and into next season before hanging him out to dry. 

The problem is at the top. Sullivan needs to back Potter and staff on the players he needs and stay away from his agent mates. That is how successful clubs operate. 
I refer you to my post on the Sullivan thread. There's only one cսnt that will hang out the manager to dry, and he's not posting on west ham online
nychammer
Posts: 1411
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post nychammer »

Give the man a fucking chance. Anyone is going to struggle to come in and turn that ageing slow squad around and make them contenders for anything again. A lot of damage has been done with sub par expensive signings, competing influence over signing players and leaving gaping holes in the squad unaddressed.

There were positives today despite that poor start. He made HT changes and seems amenable to giving youth a chance. We need to give Potter the summer window and into next season before hanging him out to dry. 

The problem is at the top. Sullivan needs to back Potter and staff on the players he needs and stay away from his agent mates. That is how successful clubs operate. 
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Takashi Miike »

I'm not excusing the players. Most of them are lazy, overpaid cunts but it's next to impossible to sack them so again, it comes back to the little cսnt signing the cheques and hiring sub standard manager after sub standard manager. No one wanted Grant, no one wanted Allardyce, no one other than his cult members wanted Moyes, no one wanted Pellegrini, no fucker wanted the Spanish Moyes. It's still early for me regarding Potter, the only positive for me so far is you can understand him in the press conferences and he has nice teeth. Other than that I don't see much difference than the shit being delivered for three plus years now
Maverick180180
Posts: 401
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 100 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Maverick180180 »

The Palace game was just as bad as today 

Palace and Brentford at home are the sort of games you’ve got to be looking at taking all 3 points in
 
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Takashi Miike »

twoleftfeet wrote: 15 Feb 2025, 17:53
Maverick180180 wrote: 15 Feb 2025, 17:21 Lopetegui - 1.15 points per game 
Potter - 0.8 points per game 
 
I’d say that’s massively worrying 
Another new poster 🎣🐟🎣🐟🎣🐟
Not a new poster at all, wind your neck in you cսnt, you're not on the beat now
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Sir Alf »

No certainty Potter will turn this club around but after only 5 weeks there have been some performance improvements with a few injuries. Today was the first disappointment esp first half.

But no time to be writing him off either. It was always a massive challenge and not solved immediately because the squad he inherited is so so poor, too old and slow.

Need to scrape a couple of victories and working om bringimg in youth. Dont expect marvels next season either, the mess of a squad we have will take several windows to fix and the coaching / tactics will take a while to become second nature to the players
Maverick180180
Posts: 401
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 100 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Maverick180180 »

twoleftfeet wrote: 15 Feb 2025, 17:53
Maverick180180 wrote: 15 Feb 2025, 17:21 Lopetegui - 1.15 points per game 
Potter - 0.8 points per game 
 
I’d say that’s massively worrying 
Another new poster 🎣🐟🎣🐟🎣🐟
I’ve been on here for years
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Manuel »

West Ham boss Graham Potter, speaking to Sky Sports: "The first half was not the performance we want at all. The goal affects the performance too much. We need to learn a lot from that. I was really pleased with the response of the players in the second half when we really pushed. We were a lot more like how we want to be."

I thought the three [Evan Ferguson, James Ward-Prowse and Ollie Scarles] had a positive impact and changed the dynamic of the team. You can see what he [Ferguson] will bring to the team. There are positives there from the second half."

We have to move fast and we have to move forward."
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post twoleftfeet »

Maverick180180 wrote: 15 Feb 2025, 17:21 Lopetegui - 1.15 points per game 
Potter - 0.8 points per game 
 
I’d say that’s massively worrying 
Another new poster 🎣🐟🎣🐟🎣🐟
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 932
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post southbankbornnbred »

Maverick180180 wrote: 15 Feb 2025, 17:21 Lopetegui - 1.15 points per game 
Potter - 0.8 points per game 
 
I’d say that’s massively worrying 
It's concerning - but across both managers and the late-era of Moyes.

From almost the morning after we won a trophy, the club has made very poor decisions. The Rice money was spent abysmally, Moyes let the squad get older and slower and didn't replace a striker, Lopetegui was an abysmal appointment and wasted most of his £120m outlay on poor, massively overpaid and slow players, and January was woefully inactive for a club with so many obvious problems with its squad.

Potter hasn't covered himself in glory yet, sure. But I genuinely think it's too early to judge him - he's not been here long, the squad he inherited is terrible and expensive, and there's a huge amount of work to do to put things right. He wouldn't have been my choice as head coach/manager, but he's definitely the sort of coach who needs time to build his team to play his way.

There are a couple of worrying early signs. His teams are notoriously shot-shy and that is evident already. It needs to stop - quickly. But we do need to give the manager some time to put things right. This is nothing like 'his' squad - and we should judge him when he's signed his preferred players and coached them through a pre-season.

The rest of this season is a write-off, though. Abysmal waste of a year.
Maverick180180
Posts: 401
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 100 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Maverick180180 »

Lopetegui - 1.15 points per game 
Potter - 0.8 points per game 
 
I’d say that’s massively worrying 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 527
Been liked: 140 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Ladysmith wrote: 15 Feb 2025, 17:06
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 15 Feb 2025, 17:04 If the flaky nonce bearded cսnt quit tonight would anyone care?

Looking like yet another total fraud sadly. Should have gone for Conceciao or Fonseca.
Would we have honestly got those managers though?
 
 
Fonseca would have but sensed they wanted Nonce Beard and Conceciao had agreed terms in like November if reports are to be believed Ladyferret.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post goose »

Moyes, Lopetegui, Potter……. Same results from all 3.
The club is just shit from top to bottom.

every time the ball is as played into our players today, a Brentford player was right up the arse or in their face.
we’re constantly two yards off people giving them easy possession all the time.

you telling me we don’t have anyone at the club who can make things difficult for the other team?? I’m so bored of the same shit week after week.
Ladysmith
Posts: 819
Has liked: 123 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Ladysmith »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 15 Feb 2025, 17:04 If the flaky nonce bearded cսnt quit tonight would anyone care?

Looking like yet another total fraud sadly. Should have gone for Conceciao or Fonseca.
Would we have honestly got those managers though?
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 527
Been liked: 140 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post THUNDERCLINT »

If the flaky nonce bearded cսnt quit tonight would anyone care?

Looking like yet another total fraud sadly. Should have gone for Conceciao or Fonseca.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post twoleftfeet »

Potter out 🐟

I predict we won't win another game this season, we might get a few draws.

Major overhaul needed, I don't envy Potter.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Manuel »

Btw, can we not take (announced) out of the subject heading now?
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Manuel »

Watched the first 10 mins then got bored as just become the usual soundbites and pats on the back etc. Seen it all before. But yes, very encouraging and he seems to be a really good fit and is a modern day coach. Let's see what he comes up with against Brentford.
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Sir Alf »

Potter makes a lot of sense and obviously an intelligent guy especially in the world of football.  A degree in social studies and leadership, worked his way up from the 9th tier of the game where some of us numpties have played in or above.  Understands the psychological side of the game and values team over individuals. Closest to John Lyall in that sense that I have seen at West Ham.  

I , and many others I suspect, want him to successful but it will take time even though we are now seeing a proper team effort.  Moyes and last summer’s less than perfect transfer window left us a weak squad despite 5 or 6 very good players.  

Its not going to be fixed totally next summer. I guess we will be patient if we continue to see progress but there are always ups and downs along the way. If we can address the lack of legs in central midfield ( will take recruitment of 2 players imo because we do not have that profile of player in Potts, Orford, Scarles and Earthy although some hopefully may make the squad), we will see a marked inprovement in our ability to press and control games.  

 
LeroysBoots
Posts: 435
Old WHO Number: 10197
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post LeroysBoots »

He's very impressive, quite exciting for our future. The previous clown couldn't speak a work of English, well English you could understand, so this is like a breath of fresh air
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Takashi Miike »

Tomshardware
Posts: 689
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 64 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Tomshardware »

Agreed Leroys,  Can even see the confidence of the players returning.  A makeshift defence last night but all seemed comfortable with the ball.   I'm more positive than I've been for a long while and am actually enjoying watching us.
LeroysBoots
Posts: 435
Old WHO Number: 10197
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post LeroysBoots »

Think he's been fantastic personally

We are better organised, he has several systems in mind during a game, he plays the kids, we are more competitive

Plus he never moans, just gets on with it

With a threadbare squad he's done a marvellous job

Just think how better we would be if he had spent the 150 million last close season than Lopetegui​​​
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post Sir Alf »

Wont really know what he’s capable of achieving until next season imo

Needs a mostly fit squad, recruitment to fill some large holes, a pre season and time to further develop the players and bed in younger recruits etc.

But with a depleted squad he has made us noticeably more competitive, better passing and possession, better pressing and not conceding a hatful and lookimg wide open. We still concede too many but have improved. Lets see how the next 5 games go and take another check then
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 2303
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 404 times

Re: Graham Potter (announced)

Post El Scorchio »

The Palace game was the only stinker. Otherwise despite the ridiculously depleted squad we've been competitive, positive and improving in every game thus far. 4 heavy defeats out of 4 under Lop.

Ran out of steam in the cup after injuries and an excellent first half
Fulham, ground it out with positive play
Palace- see above, not good
Villa- better team after 10 mins and deserved to win
Chelsea- deserved at least a draw and only bad luck and officiating stopped us getting three.

Dread to think how badly eviscerated we'd have been in all of them under the former manager.

Almost feels like someone forgot to log out and back in from another username there.
Post Reply