West Ham Online

Keep dreaming" wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 19:56 ATHammer, have you got an executive summary?

Maybe back when Kretinski walked in the gaff.? But Sullivan has always wanted his price. And will be happy as Larry. If the whole place burnt to the ground. And he collected on the insurance. So as long as he got back on what he put in. If he makes a profit on us. Great. But turning us into a great business. That has never been the idea.

RBshorty wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 14:09

Pshyco scored all 4" wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 13:52 Sullivan is many things and none are good . But daft he isn't. Even he's noticing the ever growing numbers of empty seats  Of season ticket holders not showing up . He knows the game is up in the same way as mike Ashley knew at the barcodes .  

For the most part. This may be true.? But Ashley had a half decent hand. Where our Glorious Leader is holding a whole lot of air. Unless we have a sale before August. (All the talk is BS. BTW.) Then he is going down with the ship.

Why does he care about ST holders not turning up? He's already taken their (our) money. 

Pshyco scored all 4" wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 13:52 Sullivan is many things and none are good . But daft he isn't. Even he's noticing the ever growing numbers of empty seats  Of season ticket holders not showing up . He knows the game is up in the same way as mike Ashley knew at the barcodes .  

Sullivan is many things and none are good . But daft he isn't. Even he's noticing the ever growing numbers of empty seats  Of season ticket holders not showing up . He knows the game is up in the same way as mike Ashley knew at the barcodes .  

Russ of the BML" wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 08:54 I keep saying it. 

A game that's on TV needs to be picked. And all season ticket holders and everyone who is proper West Ham needs to get a ticket and 10 minutes after KO everyone needs to walk out. Leave the stadium almost empty with just the day trippers sitting there wondering what the fuck is going on. 

It will have a massive impact. and raise the profile of getting Sullivan out. 

Sullivan will detest this as it is a bad look. It ruins the match for the day trippers. Sky won't be happy as it detracts from their wonderful brand. 

People just need to stump up for a ticket and sacrifice it for the protest. 


 

I keep saying it. 

A game that's on TV needs to be picked. And all season ticket holders and everyone who is proper West Ham needs to get a ticket and 10 minutes after KO everyone needs to walk out. Leave the stadium almost empty with just the day trippers sitting there wondering what the fuck is going on. 

It will have a massive impact. and raise the profile of getting Sullivan out. 

Sullivan will detest this as it is a bad look. It ruins the match for the day trippers. Sky won't be happy as it detracts from their wonderful brand. 

People just need to stump up for a ticket and sacrifice it for the protest. 

 

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 01:56

XKhammer wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:47

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:43

 

Why only ‘most’ of the posters fella?
You’ve already mentioned that things are ‘proper shit’. Are things only proper shit if certain poster say so? Genuinely intrigued.

 

Most posters don't threaten me but that's got fuck all to do with you marysminge

Who has threatened you, and how?

XKhammer wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:47

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:43

XKhammer wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:18

What you worried for you don't even go or contribute anything financially towards the club just moan moan and bitch non stop
OK things are proper shit and l accept the criticism from most of the posters on here as valid 

 

Why only ‘most’ of the posters fella?
You’ve already mentioned that things are ‘proper shit’. Are things only proper shit if certain poster say so? Genuinely intrigued.

 

Most posters don't threaten me but that's got fuck all to do with you marysminge

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:43

XKhammer wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:18

What you worried for you don't even go or contribute anything financially towards the club just moan moan and bitch non stop
OK things are proper shit and l accept the criticism from most of the posters on here as valid 

 

Why only ‘most’ of the posters fella?
You’ve already mentioned that things are ‘proper shit’. Are things only proper shit if certain poster say so? Genuinely intrigued.

 

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:43

XKhammer wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:18

What you worried for you don't even go or contribute anything financially towards the club just moan moan and bitch non stop
OK things are proper shit and l accept the criticism from most of the posters on here as valid 

 

Why only ‘most’ of the posters fella?
You’ve already mentioned that things are ‘proper shit’. Are things only proper shit if certain poster say so? Genuinely intrigued.

 

XKhammer wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:18

What you worried for you don't even go or contribute anything financially towards the club just moan moan and bitch non stop
OK things are proper shit and l accept the criticism from most of the posters on here as valid 

Why only ‘most’ of the posters fella?
You’ve already mentioned that things are ‘proper shit’. Are things only proper shit if certain poster say so? Genuinely intrigued.

Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:01 regular mediocrity was fine when playing in our own ground, a football ground. those parasites couldn't wait to take that away from us. they promised a next level, and increased expectations, and now they have to deliver them. now in a shithole, a mile away from the pitch and full of tourists. grant, allardyce, moyes(x2), loppy, potter. has a club ever had a run of managers that bad under the same owner? having this tedious, mediocre midlands cսnt in charge has been far worse than loppy. at least you could see he wanted to win games, despite his ineptitude

regular mediocrity was fine when playing in our own ground, a football ground. those parasites couldn't wait to take that away from us. they promised a next level, and increased expectations, and now they have to deliver them. now in a shithole, a mile away from the pitch and full of tourists. grant, allardyce, moyes(x2), loppy, potter. has a club ever had a run of managers that bad under the same owner? having this tedious, mediocre midlands cսnt in charge has been far worse than loppy. at least you could see he wanted to win games, despite his ineptitude

Currently 2,299 signed the petition any more for any more....

I want to see one of those flash global heat map breakdowns of those that voted as well like on the Govt website. 

Sullivan and Brady's egos won't be able to handle significant numbers voting against them. Won't change a thing but it would get under their wrinkly old skin.

ATHammer, have you got an executive summary?

If ever there was evidence needed that napoleon and that absolute horror Brady need to go it was Sunday's shit show against Forest. Why?
Well, the fact that we have a top class shot stopping keeper who's weakness is kicking is well known. So, regularly our know-nothing manager has him playing out from the back and a final telling error is made. Yes, Areola made the mistake. Potter rigidly insists on playing this way despite clearly not having the players to do so. But Brady pushed for a manager who is now statistically worse than Grant; Sullivan sanctioned a deal without a break clause and permits this fool of a manager to continue. The player and manager errors are symptoms, the cause of the illness is the boardroom.
The fact that this twat of a manager was not on a break clause is on them. Would he survive at any other club with the drearfest and lack of results he serves up? No. If he had had a caretaker role would he still be in a job? No.
The fact that we only hire managers from the labour exchange is entirely down to Sullivan. And the shitfest football that comes from that is on him.
The fact that Potter thinks it is OK, and not job threatening, to pick a midfield that has as much life in it as the average morgue is on his directors. There were options. When they came on we actually completed some forward passes. Potter should be shit scared for his job, this wasn't the first time this diabolical football was served up with negative results. He should not be planning to get rid of our best players to fund acquisitions for next season.
The Club claim they don't need a director of football as Sullivan is going to oversee player trading. Bollocks. Sullivan, Potter and the Data analysist are a recipe for disaster.
We have always had bad stewardship from the board in my lifetime, The Caerns; Terrence Brown, who still hangs around like a bad smell, and these bastards, who quite probably could be the worst of the lot.
Cresswell has been a great servant for this club. Did we give him a fitting farewell? No. The club would not even stump up for a testimonial.
Fabianski has been a great servant for this club. It would have been fitting to give him at least half a match on Sunday, but no, Potter decided against that.
Coufal has been a great servant for the club. Allowing him to walk around the pitch with the others after a crap season and a crap game is hardly celebrating his time as a hammer.
I briefly stayed to show some appreciation, it was clear that not many others bothered. That shortage of numbers is not on the players or the fans, It is on the board that create and perpetuate an apathetic environment (How many season ticket holders who signed up for the first year at the toilet bowl have moved on? is it around 30,000? not much "customer satisfaction" there then.)
We also have the ignominious hawking of players around the market (Kudus; Paqueta; Alvarez; and virtually anyone else) that should be embarrassing to owners of a team who only two years ago won a European trophy. It is on them that disastrous boardroom decisions have seen us languishing in the doldrums rather than consistently challenging for/in Europe.
It is rumoured that the club budgeted for an 8th place finish. That being the case why was the player recruitment not targeted and controlled by the director of football rather than "you have one pick, I have one pick" approach? Why was a bargain basement, train wreck manager who mastered Powerpoint given the role of managing the club rather than someone who fitted with a progressive approach. The lack of vision and strategy rest with the board.
These cunts plead poverty as if it was something to be proud of. Perhaps they are as they certainly did everything possible to fail.
The Caerns showed the way to be classless in the humiliating removal of John Lyall. They also demonstrated how, after relative success (finishing third in the league), with a careful lack of investment failure can be achieved easily (relegation).
The utter contempt  the current owners of our club, led by Sullivan, show for the players and fans explores new depths.
The circus is truly back in town, to Quote Grace Slick, "It's just Hell!" and will remain so until they go.  
    

Good intentions but futile. Wait for Sullivan to die is the only chance of change. And it may not be good change even then if his sons take over but it will mean the current malignant narcissistic owner no longer runs the show. 

Us older fans need to keep healthy and outlive ”Little Dave”. He’ll probably live until his late 90s though knowing our luck.  

Perhaps a more effective strategy would be to hit our sponsors where it hurts through refusing to do business with them or anyone associated with them and posting up all/any bad experiences you've/we've had with them: relentlessly & incessantly posting up (here or on social media sites) all/any bad experiences you've/we've had with them.

That way you/we can still get our matchday fixes with our mates...as we always have.

Then consider expanding those activities to the sponsors of Brand PL, Brand UEFA & Brand FIFA.

If they twig that associating themselves with West Ham/PL/UEFA/FIFA is actually having a visible negative impact on their profits & sales (advertising agencies will, however, forbid them from having such thoughts), they may reconsider another strategy to drive growth that doesn't include using professional football as a billboard.

That will then force the media to re-evaluate the cost of broadcasting such games and, as a consequence, offer much less money to do so the next time around.

Never mind hacking into The Co-op, Harrods & M&S and fucking up their IT. A hack that prevents the media from broadcasting (football), or makes it free to the end-user would make a much bigger statement, despite it impacting on my divine right to watch my team whenever and where ever I (not you. just me) want to watch my team.

Everyone does agree. And don't call me Shirley.!

Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑17 May 2025, 09:21 What’s a petition going to do? Need more days like Burnley. As Swiss pointed out they shit themselves. 

That and hitting them hard in the pocket. 

What’s a petition going to do? Need more days like Burnley. As Swiss pointed out they shit themselves. 

That and hitting them hard in the pocket. 

I can’t share it from Spain as the message would be shared in Spanish, don’t forget to tell as many as possible.

stubbo-admin wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 17:57 No idea if it will help, but some of the YouTubers starting a petition to get rid:

https://chng.it/hnjcmrsHbS