I hope the club denounce any link or association with this so called celebrity fan.
Absolute wrongun!
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 06 Apr 2025, 01:05
by XKhammer
=12.35pxWhat I can share is that I have been a young woman who fully participated with consen=12.35pxt to relationships that, looking back, I can see were abusive and exploitative. The situations I consented to harmed me in some small ways, but I could not honestly say a crime was committed against me.
You was a brass then and some knocked you for the dosh?
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 05 Apr 2025, 14:24
by Nurse Ratched
Mr Anon" wrote: ↑05 Apr 2025, 12:49
I've heard first hand what he's like from a girlfriend's mate who used to be one of his many girls he would ring up when he found himself alone at night, used to enjoy humiliating her by pissing on the toilet seat and forcing her to lick it clean, by forcing her face against it till she complied, so I have no doubt he's a wrongun. (and no I have no idea why she would give him the time of day)
maybe you can make the leap that this is only happening because of his recent politics which wouldn't surprise me, but that's a bit of a chicken and egg, personally find his recent change to pandering to the far right christian crowd all very convenient
He has never been my cup of tea for reasons I won't bore you with, but his latest version of himself as a 'charismatic' religious convert does not surprise me in the least. If the coin he flipped in his youth had landed the other way, he would have made a rather successful cult founder/leader and he could have done a lot more damage that way. He has the required attributes to be a cult leader.
He should have kept his head down and maybe he would have dodged the reckoning for the sins of his past. But it's open season on him now.
None of us know if these women were raped by him or if they just have buyer's remorse for games they willingly played with him at the time. It's pointless stating a firm belief either way. How could we possibly know?
What I can share is that I have been a young woman who fully participated with consent to relationships that, looking back, I can see were abusive and exploitative. The situations I consented to harmed me in some small ways, but I could not honestly say a crime was committed against me. As I've got older, raised children to adulthood, and re-evaluated things, it's become clearer to me.
In situations where women come forward many years after an event and make accusations, I wonder how many are going through a similar re-evaluation to mine, but they are more 'external locus of control' types who are not able to recognise and accept their own role in not protecting themselves at the time.
Of course, I am not talking about situations of genuine rape, where a woman is physically restrained and the man is aware she is not consenting. There is no grey area there.
Look at what's happening with that Victoria Guiffre. People are waking up to what a liar she is. She was never a reliable witness, but at the time people were so desperate to believe a salacious story about a member of the royal family being a sex case that they suspended critical reasoning. Again, we will never know the truth of that situation. But some people feel a weird need to pick a side, even though they know none of the people involved, did not witness events, and are not personally affected in any way.
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 05 Apr 2025, 14:05
by Eerie Decent
Your 'girlfriend's mate' got subjected that that, and kept going back.
Ignoring the fact you've made that up, it would say as much about her as it would about him.
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 05 Apr 2025, 12:49
by Mr Anon
I've heard first hand what he's like from a girlfriend's mate who used to be one of his many girls he would ring up when he found himself alone at night, used to enjoy humiliating her by pissing on the toilet seat and forcing her to lick it clean, by forcing her face against it till she complied, so I have no doubt he's a wrongun. (and no I have no idea why she would give him the time of day)
maybe you can make the leap that this is only happening because of his recent politics which wouldn't surprise me, but that's a bit of a chicken and egg, personally find his recent change to pandering to the far right christian crowd all very convenient
So because the allegations go back to the 90s you seem to think they're invalid?
Do those same rules apply to the Asian grooming gangs and Saville?Wasn't Brand a good mate with Saville and behaved luke him as well?
WTf has covid got to do with it?
Oh you're another conspiracy theorists loon and can't accept Brand who is one of your own is a sex case
XK you seem slightly confused, you mentioned Conspiracy theory loons and I was merely pointing out that Covid was always painted to be a real pandemic yet many never believed it and were targeted as tin foil hat wearers and agitators, yet history has now put them on the side of truth.
Swville was never convicted, you have to ask the authorities why but then you may be labelled a conspiracy theorist and the Rotherham rape gangs started in the early 90s and the first convictions started in 2012, so not sure how that's relevant to Brand who is facing a charge from almost 30 years prior.
Finally I'm not defending Brand and hope that justice prevails, but I'm always sceptical about something so historic, looking at Brand and the way he is a thorn in the establishments side make a you wonder who is behind this
Now put your pitchfork away until you see the evidence
he's a dense order following fucking idiot, don't bother with the cսnt
Don't forget not to sail on a ship the danger that poses as the earth is flat according to you....and I'm dense lol
XK are you still standing in line to get your COVID jabs, believing it all started from some tiddley having a bowl of bat soup in a wet market in Wuhan?
Aren't some of these allegations from the 90s, good luck proving that one, but I suppose if you have a judge in your back pocket then anything is possible
So because the allegations go back to the 90s you seem to think they're invalid?
Do those same rules apply to the Asian grooming gangs and Saville?Wasn't Brand a good mate with Saville and behaved luke him as well?
WTf has covid got to do with it?
Oh you're another conspiracy theorists loon and can't accept Brand who is one of your own is a sex case
XK you seem slightly confused, you mentioned Conspiracy theory loons and I was merely pointing out that Covid was always painted to be a real pandemic yet many never believed it and were targeted as tin foil hat wearers and agitators, yet history has now put them on the side of truth.
Swville was never convicted, you have to ask the authorities why but then you may be labelled a conspiracy theorist and the Rotherham rape gangs started in the early 90s and the first convictions started in 2012, so not sure how that's relevant to Brand who is facing a charge from almost 30 years prior.
Finally I'm not defending Brand and hope that justice prevails, but I'm always sceptical about something so historic, looking at Brand and the way he is a thorn in the establishments side make a you wonder who is behind this
Now put your pitchfork away until you see the evidence
he's a dense order following fucking idiot, don't bother with the cսnt
So because the allegations go back to the 90s you seem to think they're invalid?
Do those same rules apply to the Asian grooming gangs and Saville?Wasn't Brand a good mate with Saville and behaved luke him as well?
WTf has covid got to do with it?
Oh you're another conspiracy theorists loon and can't accept Brand who is one of your own is a sex case
Have you seen this proof of his guilt, seeing as you're already convinced of it and made up your mind, I presume you have.
Are Saville and Wacko Jacko innocent as well?
I've made my mind up about them
Nope just because he's a conspiracy theorist loon he doesn't get a get out of jail card....he's a wrong and clearly sex case,plenty of evidence against him
"just because he's a conspiracy theorist loon"
XK are you still standing in line to get your COVID jabs, believing it all started from some tiddley having a bowl of bat soup in a wet market in Wuhan?
Aren't some of these allegations from the 90s, good luck proving that one, but I suppose if you have a judge in your back pocket then anything is possible
So because the allegations go back to the 90s you seem to think they're invalid?
Do those same rules apply to the Asian grooming gangs and Saville?Wasn't Brand a good mate with Saville and behaved luke him as well?
WTf has covid got to do with it?
Oh you're another conspiracy theorists loon and can't accept Brand who is one of your own is a sex case
XK you seem slightly confused, you mentioned Conspiracy theory loons and I was merely pointing out that Covid was always painted to be a real pandemic yet many never believed it and were targeted as tin foil hat wearers and agitators, yet history has now put them on the side of truth.
Swville was never convicted, you have to ask the authorities why but then you may be labelled a conspiracy theorist and the Rotherham rape gangs started in the early 90s and the first convictions started in 2012, so not sure how that's relevant to Brand who is facing a charge from almost 30 years prior.
Finally I'm not defending Brand and hope that justice prevails, but I'm always sceptical about something so historic, looking at Brand and the way he is a thorn in the establishments side make a you wonder who is behind this
Now put your pitchfork away until you see the evidence
Have you seen this proof of his guilt, seeing as you're already convinced of it and made up your mind, I presume you have.
Are Saville and Wacko Jacko innocent as well?
I've made my mind up about them
A simple no you know nothing about his cases would have sufficed, you're finding him guilty based on fuck all
So you think the documentaries were based on fuck all and the police and CPS investigations charged him based on fuck all?
Wonder how long before you link it to Hunter's laptop
So because the allegations go back to the 90s you seem to think they're invalid?
Do those same rules apply to the Asian grooming gangs and Saville?Wasn't Brand a good mate with Saville and behaved luke him as well?
WTf has covid got to do with it?
Oh you're another conspiracy theorists loon and can't accept Brand who is one of your own is a sex case
Have you seen this proof of his guilt, seeing as you're already convinced of it and made up your mind, I presume you have.
Are Saville and Wacko Jacko innocent as well?
I've made my mind up about them
A simple no you know nothing about his cases would have sufficed, you're finding him guilty based on fuck all
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 05 Apr 2025, 10:12
by wils
Reading through the comments here, I think that both perspectives are probably true. He's a sex pest that's overstepped the line a few times, but, also, the only reason people are bothered about that now is becuase of his politics.
XK are you still standing in line to get your COVID jabs, believing it all started from some tiddley having a bowl of bat soup in a wet market in Wuhan?
Aren't some of these allegations from the 90s, good luck proving that one, but I suppose if you have a judge in your back pocket then anything is possible
So because the allegations go back to the 90s you seem to think they're invalid?
Do those same rules apply to the Asian grooming gangs and Saville?Wasn't Brand a good mate with Saville and behaved luke him as well?
WTf has covid got to do with it?
Oh you're another conspiracy theorists loon and can't accept Brand who is one of your own is a sex case
Have you seen this proof of his guilt, seeing as you're already convinced of it and made up your mind, I presume you have.
Are Saville and Wacko Jacko innocent as well?
I've made my mind up about them
Nope just because he's a conspiracy theorist loon he doesn't get a get out of jail card....he's a wrong and clearly sex case,plenty of evidence against him
"just because he's a conspiracy theorist loon"
XK are you still standing in line to get your COVID jabs, believing it all started from some tiddley having a bowl of bat soup in a wet market in Wuhan?
Aren't some of these allegations from the 90s, good luck proving that one, but I suppose if you have a judge in your back pocket then anything is possible
So because the allegations go back to the 90s you seem to think they're invalid?
Do those same rules apply to the Asian grooming gangs and Saville?Wasn't Brand a good mate with Saville and behaved luke him as well?
WTf has covid got to do with it?
Oh you're another conspiracy theorists loon and can't accept Brand who is one of your own is a sex case
Have you seen this proof of his guilt, seeing as you're already convinced of it and made up your mind, I presume you have.
iphammer wrote: ↑04 Apr 2025, 21:03
I'm no fan of brand but this seems normal now if you start exposing the establishment, the establishment will pay a load of women to come forward and cry rape when they know full well it never happened. He'll be silenced and put inside now. Why hasn't edwards and scofield been put inside
Nope just because he's a conspiracy theorist loon he doesn't get a get out of jail card....he's a wrong and clearly sex case,plenty of evidence against him
"just because he's a conspiracy theorist loon"
XK are you still standing in line to get your COVID jabs, believing it all started from some tiddley having a bowl of bat soup in a wet market in Wuhan?
Aren't some of these allegations from the 90s, good luck proving that one, but I suppose if you have a judge in your back pocket then anything is possible
So because the allegations go back to the 90s you seem to think they're invalid?
Do those same rules apply to the Asian grooming gangs and Saville?Wasn't Brand a good mate with Saville and behaved luke him as well?
WTf has covid got to do with it?
Oh you're another conspiracy theorists loon and can't accept Brand who is one of your own is a sex case
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 05 Apr 2025, 09:41
by Leavemyarcelona
Any dissenting voices of the elites and this is what happens.
Just wait until all the stuff about a actual wrongun Sullivan comes out.
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 05 Apr 2025, 09:36
by fraser
Nah from what I know he's OK and highly intelligent nice bloke. I've also watched quite a few of his videos and he doesn't come across as a conspiracy theory nutcase at all, just someone who isn't sucked in by the MSM
.
Considering all their lies during covid most of which have since been proven who would.
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 05 Apr 2025, 09:32
by Mike Oxsaw
twoleftfeet wrote: ↑04 Apr 2025, 20:49
25 years before they decided to report him, not suspicious at all
There's a poster or two that have carried a grudge on here for at least that long...
...and, yeah, start asking questions that certain members of the establishment would rather not be asked and they're going to get a right stampy-foot strop on.
iphammer wrote: ↑04 Apr 2025, 21:03
I'm no fan of brand but this seems normal now if you start exposing the establishment, the establishment will pay a load of women to come forward and cry rape when they know full well it never happened. He'll be silenced and put inside now. Why hasn't edwards and scofield been put inside
Nope just because he's a conspiracy theorist loon he doesn't get a get out of jail card....he's a wrong and clearly sex case,plenty of evidence against him
"just because he's a conspiracy theorist loon"
XK are you still standing in line to get your COVID jabs, believing it all started from some tiddley having a bowl of bat soup in a wet market in Wuhan?
Aren't some of these allegations from the 90s, good luck proving that one, but I suppose if you have a judge in your back pocket then anything is possible
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 05 Apr 2025, 00:29
by Sydney_Iron
Lets have the trial before getting the pitchforks out! Innocent until proven guilty and all that.
Hes an oddball and a bit eccentric and now a conspiracy nut job on social media, but i really cant see him raping woman back a few years ago, he freely admitted he would shag anything that moved back then but rape??? He is a white bloke though, so in the eyes of the extreme that's ground enough to be guilty.
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 04 Apr 2025, 22:45
by honky cat
He was sitting in front of me years ago in the bobby moore upper, just normal in jeans and hoodie all low key. And then a couple of years later he was over there showing off and mincing around like Mr Claypole.
Hes a bit strange but i think hes been fitted up.
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 04 Apr 2025, 21:19
by XKhammer
iphammer wrote: ↑04 Apr 2025, 21:03
I'm no fan of brand but this seems normal now if you start exposing the establishment, the establishment will pay a load of women to come forward and cry rape when they know full well it never happened. He'll be silenced and put inside now. Why hasn't edwards and scofield been put inside
Nope just because he's a conspiracy theorist loon he doesn't get a get out of jail card....he's a wrong and clearly sex case,plenty of evidence against him
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 04 Apr 2025, 21:03
by iphammer
I'm no fan of brand but this seems normal now if you start exposing the establishment, the establishment will pay a load of women to come forward and cry rape when they know full well it never happened. He'll be silenced and put inside now. Why hasn't edwards and scofield been put inside
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 04 Apr 2025, 20:49
by twoleftfeet
25 years before they decided to report him, not suspicious at all
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 04 Apr 2025, 19:14
by goose
Re: Russell Brand
Posted: 04 Apr 2025, 18:40
by mallard
A pint of lager, a small Baileys and a Gin & Tonic….
