Page 5 of 13

Crapaqueta

Posted: 30 Nov 2025, 16:06
by THUNDERCLINT
Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.

Out the door 1st Jan.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 23:20
by Monsieur merde de cheval
Nutsin wrote: 15 Jan 2026, 16:03 He is way overrated, get rid asap. Bring in someone who doesn’t give the ball away all the time. This idiot learned nothing in his time with us, he is stuck on stupid.

Use the money on a quality young center half and bring in a holding midfielder with some pace.

This needs to be the absolute minimum we need to do this window.
'Center' ...turned  full yank aintcha 😐

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 17:22
by Sir Alf
Agree Nutsin although getting in the right players, or for that fact any players, is always the risk with Sullivan. He may just see the fee as a way to cover much of the cost of the two lads brought in and look instead for some budget fee, stop gaps. Old, slow, high wages, no resale value are the usual attributes that we ( or should I say Sully ) goes for. 

 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 16:03
by Nutsin
He is way overrated, get rid asap. Bring in someone who doesn’t give the ball away all the time. This idiot learned nothing in his time with us, he is stuck on stupid.

Use the money on a quality young center half and bring in a holding midfielder with some pace.

This needs to be the absolute minimum we need to do this window.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 15:45
by simons
Having this bloke hang around like a bad smell doesn’t sit very well with me at all. 

if he were to play out of his skin, and contribute to some much needed points, it would only beg the question why couldn’t he have tried a bit more in the previous games this season? 

He can fuck off. And when he gets there, he can fuck off some more. 


 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 15:43
by dealcanvey
It does not matter how good he is (dont rate him as high as others). He simply does not want to play for us. We aren't in the position to dig our heels in on this one. Sell him and move on.

He wont be playing against spurs at the weekend and he should not either. Nuno and the club are delaying the inevitable in trying to keep him here or holding out for a price we wont get.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 15:30
by AKA ERNIE
Mate of mine was there at the time no reason to doubt him tbf

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 15:13
by fraser
AKA ERNIE" wrote: 15 Jan 2026, 14:41 No mate he didn't he told nuno on sat he did have a bad medics found fuck all wrong with his back he then had a strop and said no I can't play and stormed off
Where's this from? 

No less likely to be true than all the other rumours I suppose. But that's all they are rumours so who knows which ones are true 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 14:41
by AKA ERNIE
No mate he didn't he told nuno on sat he did have a bad medics found fuck all wrong with his back he then had a strop and said no I can't play and stormed off

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 14:31
by Rossal
Steinberg saying we are happy to sell him but only if Flamengo loan him back till end of season 

why on earth would they agree to that?  Sullivan really is a joke 

just sell the useless cսnt and get a few players in 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 13:25
by gpike
Massive Attack" wrote: 14 Jan 2026, 23:51 He's generally shit wherever he's asked to play bar the occasional rare game in the Premier League. He doesn't suit any position consistently enough in it. 3rd rate cup competitions or French/Brazilian Leagues he can do a bit better in.
 
 
Sounds like he is in his way... 40 m is a fair price for a bloke who by and large has been a total liability 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 13:24
by fraser
So it seems he has had  a bad back and didn't refuse to play against QPR. 

 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 12:04
by El Scorchio
Seems like a good compromise if the player is OK with it.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 12:03
by Exiled In Surrey
Today’s Telegraph saying the club willing to sell him but only if they can keep him on loan to the end of the year.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 00:58
by nychammer
maybe when you play surrounded by a shower of shit you become another  turd. Undoubted talent that just didn't couldn't do enough here. I don't for one minute believe the board instigated rumours that he wants out, is acting up etc. and I wish him well. 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 00:18
by Manuel
Massive Attack" wrote: 14 Jan 2026, 23:51 He's generally shit wherever he's asked to play bar the occasional rare game in the Premier League. He doesn't suit any position consistently enough in it. 3rd rate cup competitions or French/Brazilian Leagues he can do a bit better in.
How many times do you have to keep saying you don't rate him?? We heard you the first hundred times. He doesn't come on here, so little point in laying into him day in day out.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 23:51
by Massive Attack
He's generally shit wherever he's asked to play bar the occasional rare game in the Premier League. He doesn't suit any position consistently enough in it. 3rd rate cup competitions or French/Brazilian Leagues he can do a bit better in.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 23:31
by Sir Alf
He’s been decent only as a number 8 playing deeper fir us. Just the same as at Lyon.

He thinks he some kind of creative, goal scoring number 10. He aint got the legs / speed for that.  

 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 21:06
by Massive Attack
We tried that and even when he was surrounded by better players we still almost got relegated, even when he would line-up alongside Declan Rice. He's never been consistently good. Once in a blue moon he'll have a good game but they have always been few and far between. £50M this bloke cost us.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 19:41
by Kitchenette
Gank wrote: 16 Dec 2025, 15:06 I don't know, I still think we would be better buying players to get the best out of Paqueta than selling Paqueta to suit the dross that plays around him.
Agreed

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 19:36
by iphammer
We don't need cu$ts in our team who want to jump ship and aren't prepared to get us out of the mess we're in. He can fuck off. 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 16:54
by Keep dreaming
Mad Dog" wrote: 14 Jan 2026, 16:51 This moody arrogant,play acting  ball giving away, dissent red carding, "non" gambling, pretend phone throwing away, stroppy cսnt fucked off yet?
You beat me with that post 🧐🤣

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 16:51
by Mad Dog
This moody arrogant,play acting  ball giving away, dissent red carding, "non" gambling, pretend phone throwing away, stroppy cսnt fucked off yet?

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 16:24
by Massive Attack
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 14 Jan 2026, 14:25
Any Old Iron" wrote: 14 Jan 2026, 14:06 If it’s true that he went on strike at the weekend then we have no choice but to dump the cսnt. 
He’s been pissing me off more and more during the past year.  He’s looked disinterested most of the time and contributes very little. Get rid of the horrible ingrate. 
Apparently since April 2024 Ederson has 4 times as many Premier League assists than this cսnt.

Sums it up. 😆

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 16:04
by Keep dreaming
Has this cսnt traveled yet?
If not, can anyone piss in his shoes and shit in his toilet bag?

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 14:25
by THUNDERCLINT
Any Old Iron" wrote: 14 Jan 2026, 14:06 If it’s true that he went on strike at the weekend then we have no choice but to dump the cսnt. 
He’s been pissing me off more and more during the past year.  He’s looked disinterested most of the time and contributes very little. Get rid of the horrible ingrate. 
Apparently since April 2024 Ederson has 4 times as many Premier League assists than this cսnt.