Page 41 of 41

Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 09:23
by Pentonville
Dispatches tonight could be about him so he has jumped in first dismissing claims and rumours and saying anything he did in past was consensual. No doubt it will be said that this is The Matrix coming after him due to his opposition to mainstream media.

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:56
by stewie griffin
"Bit harsh, cough son? No denying it was a cunty thing to do but he's grown up a fair bit since then"

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:46
by duffster
"Mrs Jones, better than just being a cսnt"

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:33
by Lily Hammer
"I hope all that comes from this is he is not guilty and he gets another 6.5 million subscriptions on YouTube, so more people get to watch the brilliant work he’s been doing these last few years. The reason he’s still up on YouTube is that he’s been giving a masterclass on how to avoid justifying censorship, “ALLEGEDLY!” Obvious hit piece, and goose makes a good point about the timing."

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:18
by Sarge
Far Cough 11:05 Sat Sep 16 Completely agree.

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:13
by Pentonville
"Swindon, tonight's dispatches is apparently about a couple of celebs. Could be Brand and Walliams who were both linked to Ryan. That's just a guess though."

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:08
by swindon hammer
There was a thread on here a while back after Kathryn Ryan said there was a well known TV personality who was a sexual predator and it seemed fairly obvious she was alluding to Russel Brand.

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:05
by Far Cough
"West Ham or not, he's a fucking cսnt, what he and that other cսnt Jonathan Ross did to Andrew Sachs (Manuel in Fawlty Towers) is unforgivable. cսnt"

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:00
by Manuel
"At best a strange bloke, at worst a complete wrong'un. Neil Oliver is another who has been questioning the powers that be for a few years now, but maybe they don't have owt on him as they possibly do with Brand. Still, ain't gonna make fuck all difference to me whatever may come his way."

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:00
by Manuel
"At best a strange bloke, at worst a complete wrong'un. Neil Oliver is another who has been questioning the powers that be for a few years now, but maybe they don't have owt on him as they possibly do with Brand. Still, ain't gonna make fuck all difference to me whatever may come his way."

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 10:44
by Nagel
"There's that famous story Billy Connolly told where he was doing a film with Brand, who kept badgering the wardrobe girl to show him her tits, refusing to go on set for two hours until she eventually agreed to do it. I don't think it's a massive leap to imagine that kind of sexual harassment to go further when no-one else is around. And for those who don't see why a man who gets laid a lot would need to force someone to have sex, you'd have thought that he'd seen enough women bare their breasts in his life not to feel the need to pressure someone in to doing that either. Some men just don't like taking no for an answer."

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 10:31
by goose
Taking him down just in time to announce new Covid variants and lockdowns.

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 10:15
by Pentonville
"Sadly I've been questioning how he has managed to stay under the radar for years. Everytime I see him questioning the powers that be, I've always said he had some neck doing so as his past could easily be brought up. I' knew him well and saw first hand what he was like. Very handsy, very forthright and forceful of his will and was only about one thing but as been mentioned below, he had no end of offers and all women that I could see succumbed willingly. Even my ex who wasnt my ex at the time...RUSSELL!! lol. Of those that he did the deed with, i doubt very much that it would be hard to find one who will claim he forced her or used his position of power which is a crock of shit but counts as rape these days I guess."

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 09:57
by Nagel
Seems like he's trying to take ownership of the narrative by making out that it's some character assassination conspiracy because of his political views. It'll help that a lot of people don't understand why he would bother raping anyone when he was getting laid a lot anyway. This was brought up before when it was obvious that RB was the bloke Katharine Ryan was making accusations about last year.

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 09:56
by happygilmore
"Has this anything to do with Katherine Ryan ? Sorry, I wouldn't even click on a daily mail link let alone browse it willingly."

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 09:40
by BRANDED
There are going to be a lot of powerful people wanting to take him down. The Telegraph tried it about six months ago but completely failed. Sex is always a good one and he openly says he had A LOT of sex.

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 09:40
by Takashi Miike
"I despise the mainstream media, but I've been wary of brand and how his youtube channel got so big despite him 'questioning' certain narratives. untold smaller channels were removed for far less, but I defend his ability to stand up against these shitbags. I was wondering if a certain newspaper is involved, but they're all compromised and pushing the same dystopian agendas, so it could be any of them"

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 09:28
by Hello Mrs. Jones
Pseudo-intellectual cսnt

Re: Russell Brand

Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 09:25
by Pentonville
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12524793/Russell-Brand-denies-allegations-ahead-Channel-4-Dispatches.html