The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 09 Dec 2024, 09:19
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 16:07 Luckily, we banned guns in the UK, so we avoid any senseless killing.
...is the vibe I'm getting from the Aussie minge & Capitol They?
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 15:57Mr Anon" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 15:44THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 15:19Shut up you fucking retard. I used to target shoot and kept similar rifles at home in the UK, as do many others.
The rifles aren't the problems anymore than a knife or a bag of fertilizer is.
it 's the failure to institutionalize loons because liberal's don't like that causes all this shit.
OK Rambo, how much damage do you reckon you could do with a Rifle compared to a knife before you're tackled to the floor? and how capable is the average inbreed capable of making a fertiliser bomb? I will say there's a logical reason for owning a bolt action, ie hunting, but people tend to go full retard when they try and justify owning assault riflesIf some is close enough to tackle you then you'll do no damage with a long gun. You'll never raise it and sight it in time.
All 3 are basically inanimate objects they present no danger by themselves, same as a car, a hammer, a length of rope or a pointy stick.
The problem is 70 years of moronic liberal policy on the detention and treatment of mentals.
Mad Dog" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 15:32 "The rifles aren't the problems anymore than a knife or a bag of fertilizer is."
i dont agree with that. Difficult to kill someone with a knife from 200 meters a la charlie kirk
Also you dont get semi automatic knives that can cut down 20 people in a room in seconds
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 15:47They were able to make one for the Manchester Arena bombing.
Anyone remember the Anarchists Cookbook?
Mr Anon" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 15:44THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 15:19Fauxstralian wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 14:49 Police have footage of the killer who appears to be of college age
They have recovered the weapon … a high powered bolt action rifle
In what universe does a citizen need such a weapon?
Has Trump announced control of entirely unnecessary weapons yet?
If not why not?Shut up you fucking retard. I used to target shoot and kept similar rifles at home in the UK, as do many others.
The rifles aren't the problems anymore than a knife or a bag of fertilizer is.
it 's the failure to institutionalize loons because liberal's don't like that causes all this shit.
OK Rambo, how much damage do you reckon you could do with a Rifle compared to a knife before you're tackled to the floor? and how capable is the average inbreed capable of making a fertiliser bomb? I will say there's a logical reason for owning a bolt action, ie hunting, but people tend to go full retard when they try and justify owning assault rifles
Russ of the BML" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 12:36 It doesn't actually really matter what Kirk's belief's were. Anyone on here or anywhere else stating his comments were inflammatory and hence almost saying "he had it coming" are woefully missing the point.
Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally.
That's the problem. The extreme hard Left are incapable of logic, sense and rational when they are unable to argue back.
Kirk gave millions of people a platform to debate. Whatever their views were. But ultimately, the views are irrelevant. Its the actions that count. And the actions of that shooter and some of the scum bags celebrating show you all you need to know about the state of the Left.
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 15:19Fauxstralian wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 14:49 Police have footage of the killer who appears to be of college age
They have recovered the weapon … a high powered bolt action rifle
In what universe does a citizen need such a weapon?
Has Trump announced control of entirely unnecessary weapons yet?
If not why not?Shut up you fucking retard. I used to target shoot and kept similar rifles at home in the UK, as do many others.
The rifles aren't the problems anymore than a knife or a bag of fertilizer is.
it 's the failure to institutionalize loons because liberal's don't like that causes all this shit.
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 10:38Vexed wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 10:33Massive Attack" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 10:27 Pretty much, Bill.
The Demonicrats and the like have somehow managed to convince themselves Charlie Kirk (and Trump) was the devil incarnate, when in actual fact they were projecting their own demons on to him. All proper weird shit.
I think like Eerie/Trundle touched on earlier, it's ego that has also played a part in hiw twisted they have got over Kirk when debating him. These are supposed to be the clever cunts of the class with the moral high ground and when challenged by a switched on geezer like Kirk, it fucked with their heads as they couldn't stomach losing so many debates that happened on their manor at Uni.You seem a little overinvested in this.
Yeah, not like it isn't a huge political news story about a cause I strongly believe in with regards to free speech.
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 14:49 Police have footage of the killer who appears to be of college age
They have recovered the weapon … a high powered bolt action rifle
In what universe does a citizen need such a weapon?
Has Trump announced control of entirely unnecessary weapons yet?
If not why not?
, wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 13:11 Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally.
Can someone advise us on how to debate with someone whose views are predicated on a god who has bestowed rights on people. How, for example, is believing your existence and actions are governed by a God at all rational?
OK_Guy wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 12:17And what is this Christian perspective on homosexuality he took? Please tell us. Did it involve free will to be stoned to death?hmmm, out of interest... what is you take on the hanging, stoning, & throwing-off buildings/mountains of homosexuals in certain Muslim countries?... that is fact, what Mr. Kirk said (or didn't say) was hearsay, would you not agree?
I wasn't a follower, he was too religious for me in his thinking that said, he always came across as reasoned & non-violent.
John Drake" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 14:16Massive Attack" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 13:37 Have we found this stoning to death quote from the disgusting pig Kirk, who never committed a single crime or act of violence, yet?
I've just got to double check which way my compass should be pointing after seeing it..
I'm probably as far from what this guy stood for a you can get. There is a clip of him talking about stoning homosexuals to death but it is easily taken out of context. It was part of a conversation with someone who had quoted a passage from the bible (which we don't hear) and his response was to quote the biblical text about stoning to death a man who lay with another man or some such. As ever when it comes to the bible a load of baloney but it wasn't presented as Kirk's opinion.
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 13:37 Have we found this stoning to death quote from the disgusting pig Kirk, who never committed a single crime or act of violence, yet?
I've just got to double check which way my compass should be pointing after seeing it..![]()
Russ of the BML" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 12:36 It doesn't actually really matter what Kirk's belief's were. Anyone on here or anywhere else stating his comments were inflammatory and hence almost saying "he had it coming" are woefully missing the point.
Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally.
That's the problem. The extreme hard Left are incapable of logic, sense and rational when they are unable to argue back.
Kirk gave millions of people a platform to debate. Whatever their views were. But ultimately, the views are irrelevant. Its the actions that count. And the actions of that shooter and some of the scum bags celebrating show you all you need to know about the state of the Left.
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 06:41Nutsin wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 06:05One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 05:54Charlie Kirk said that a few gun deaths was acceptable to keep gun laws as they are. I strongly disagree and am glad you now feel the sameI think it would be wise if you just shut the fuck up until we find out who and why it happened.
To politicize it is disgusting, but then when it comes to you it’s not surprising.But here you were, emidiately blaming it on lefties, without any evidence