West Ham Online

"We're gonna have a British George Floyd now innit. The BLM mob are gonna be all over this. Expect a load of shoe shops to be looted as a ""protest"". This country's gone to the fucking dogs."

"At which point I literally have no idea what you're babbling on about. Your question of 6:04 though""¶ No, I don't think it would include that. You typing all that though, under the circumstances, would be a classic case study of narcissism in full flow."

I'm gonna state you can't own the claim the public don't report crime because people believe the police don't act because they are restricted by the establishment's lefty ideology. You can't own it because you know I'd hand you your fat pallid arse.

"""You were just having a frustrated hissy and your intention was lost in your emotional meltdown""ù Here we go yet again. You get picked up on something you've stated that's incorrect, and your narcissism cannot handle it. Without a leg to stand on, you then proceed to ignore it completely, or produce a load of word salad, and when all else fails, you resort to claiming the other person is raging in anger. If you did get paid for it, you'd be up there with Bill Gates."

Is public property on this site being smashed up? Can't say I've noticed.

Narcissistic Affective Disorder - does that cover believing it is right to smash up public property because people don't necessarily agree with you on immigration and labour market policy?

How can you expect payment when you bring nothing of value to the site?

"""You're incapable of that as you are a narcissist"" correct, one of many that pollutes the site"

"At least I treated you with enough respect to try to fathom the real intention behind ""Pickle, you say that being respectful of each other is a good starting point, but you are perhaps the poster on here with the least respect for people who have other opinions that you don't share. Time and time again when a half decent argument is put your way, you ignore the points in question and resort to tiresome stereotypes.""ù too much respect, I suppose. You were just having a frustrated hissy and your intention was lost in your emotional meltdown. I should be paid for this."

"""You said I wasn't treating you with the respect you expect""ù I didn't say that either. I don't expect or want any respect from you. You're incapable of that as you are a narcissist. That is three things now, all in the space of one morning. Incredible."

"*only thing you bring to the game This is so dull it's almost impossible to focus. I doubt the tactic ever brought you any results -in the end, the unfortunate institution employing you would have gone to the wall well before you got anything out of the taxpayer."

You said I wasn't treating you with the respect you expect. I told you what the condition of my respect was. You don't like it? I guess that would be because misrepresentation is about the only thing being to the game.

"Keep waffling and gaslighting, and hopefully everybody will forget/get bored with this segment of the debate and move on. Last poster to have the final word on the matter is obviously the winner."

"You said this morning that I have been misrepresenting your posts, in order that you can defend criminal activity. I've asked you to show me ONE example of when I've done that. You've followed that up by saying that I've stated that the police are hampered by left wing ideology. Again, I haven't even mentioned left wing ideology. But please feel free to c&p where I have? All this in the space of a couple of hours. Are you pissed already?"

So your reference wasn't really supporting any claim at all. What is it here I'm supposed to be respecting by the way?

"I never mentioned left wing ideology. You want me to provide you with a link to YouGov stats? It's hardly a fucking niche, obscure site that's hard to find is it? You're making stuff up now, twice in the space of one page. All over the place. Go and have a swim or something?"

Didn't something decadent and rebelliously anti-government (however you try to spin it) happen in Polish shipyards 3 or 4 decades ago? How did that turn out?

Here you go dickhead: https://www.thetimes.com/uk/law/article/lack-of-confidence-in-police-threatens-british-policing-model-crime-justice-commission-fkhv0vhzf Or you can go on the YouGov website and continue your ritual embarrassment which you appear to enjoy so much. Or you can fuck off and take a shit in the garden of your hovel.

"Stewie The Prime minister stood there and basically announced war on the British people, with his face recognition statement. What's the stupid cսnt gonna do put half the country in jail for terrorism ffs? He is a cսnt and a retard. I say keep going until the Judas is out of office. How can anyone have faith in that cսnt! Go on strike and burn down the police stations until he quits. He underestimated the common people and now he's about to find out. If anybody thinks this is going away then they're as stupid as the PM. It's only going to get worse. The real Knuckle draggers are the Cunts that are running around with knives raping little girls. Let's be honest."

*you're

"I said it was a clumsy misrepresentation to claim the public don't respect the police. This caused you to react with the claim the public are not reporting crime to the police, which you attribute to the police failing to act because they are hampered by left-wing ideology. You have sourced your claim to YouGov but fail, once again to provide a link. Yet you demand I respect your post. Your having a bubble son."

Spectacular Outstanding Why put oneself out when William and Pointy here are so adept at discrediting themselves as and their cause as altogether marginal and irresponsible. By all means go the way of the IRA - see how that turns out for you.

Spectacular Outstanding Why put oneself out when William and Pointy here are so adept at discrediting themselves as and their cause as altogether marginal and irresponsible. By all means go the way of the IRA - see how that turns out for you.

"Where and when have I misrepresented your posts and claimed you're defending criminal activity? One example would be good. Take your time. You said something about the police, which I disagreed with and pointed you in the direction of YouGov stats on it. Which you've conveniently ignored, but now demand that I answer a question on something that's largely unrelated. How about fuck off?"

"SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote... ""Nobody, least of all politicians, will say this, but a degree of violence IS absolutely necessary if you want a protest to succeed. Without it, politicians will take not a blind bit of notice."" Sadly there is truth in this. Thatcher used to say to they IRA that they ""can't bomb their way to the negotiating table."" But they did, didn't they? The only thing I would say about Sunderland is the mindlessness of the violence is alienating people who would support the underlying cause. I want to march alongside them (in London, not going up there!) with my family, but I can't while they are doing this. I will look stupid and achieve nothing. They need to find things to smash up that look more legitimate if they want to resort to violence and still bring people with them. The French are good at that sort of thing."

"I actually blame us being in the EU for the decline. The UK politicians we voted for simply deferred all societal decision making to Brussels who, like the rest of mainland Europe, don't give a fuck about the UK: the whole nation would make an ideal immigration processing centre for the glorious EU, where they could easily contain any troublesome types at arms - or rather La Manche - distance. Now we're out of the EU, no UK MP has a clue about how to even begin to address the problem."