Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 845
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 143 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Come On You Irons
Posts: 845
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 143 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

Fauxstralian wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 12:25 No one deserves to die for expressing their beliefs but he sounds like a typical MAGA mouth breather with no respect for anyone not of his ilk
Like Trump 
He is hardly Martin Luther King is he?
Thats the Martin Luther King he described as a myth when telling us that enacting the Civil Rights Act was a ‘huge mistake’
What an appalling comment. A new depth sunk to by Sven, the fake plastic Aussie.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2259
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 508 times
Been liked: 771 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Comma.

I very much doubt that Mr Kirk needed  God to tell him that there are only 2 genders and that men can't conceive.
Massive Attack
Posts: 5833
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3382 times
Been liked: 1708 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Oh yeah, that massive bigoted, misogynistic, racist God and his crew. Jesus Christ...
,
Posts: 1094
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally. 

Can someone advise us on how to debate with someone whose views are predicated on a god who has bestowed rights on people. How, for example, is believing your existence and actions are governed by a God at all rational?
violator
Posts: 719
Old WHO Number: 15360
Has liked: 216 times
Been liked: 207 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post violator »

Didn't he quote a passage from the bible about it, or something like that?
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3762
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 724 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

Mad Dog" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 12:42
One Sunny Day" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.


 
One sunny day
Doubt he did that.  Can you back up that claim with an actual quote?
I, too, would like to see this, They-son?
Pub Bigot
Posts: 746
Old WHO Number: 255703
Has liked: 927 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Pub Bigot »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:51
Pub Bigot" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:48
One Sunny Day" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.



 
He did not. He took a Christian perspective on homosexuality, and also believed in free will. Whether he believed being homosexual leads to damnation is another subject, but he has never endorsed violence. 
And what is this Christian perspective on homosexuality he took? Please tell us. Did it involve free will to be stoned to death?
You’re not very bright. If he took a stance of no violence, what do you think? 

Being a Christian, he sees all of mankind as being built in the image of God, and murdering someone, other than in defence would go against Gods will. 

If you’re not aware of his positions on things, you should stop commenting because you’re making yourself look a cսnt. 
Mad Dog
Posts: 2257
Old WHO Number: 10053
Has liked: 163 times
Been liked: 281 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mad Dog »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.

 
One sunny day
Doubt he did that.  Can you back up that claim with an actual quote?
Massive Attack
Posts: 5833
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3382 times
Been liked: 1708 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

A fucking brave mouth breather if you ask me. Encourages anyone to debate him armed only with a deadly microphone in his hand. Whilst others had to resort to sniper rifles to defeat him is a tad unfair but hey, he's only got himself to blame for his 2nd amendment beliefs..
Russ of the BML
Posts: 1214
Old WHO Number: 14551
Has liked: 439 times
Been liked: 441 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Russ of the BML »

It doesn't actually really matter what Kirk's belief's were. Anyone on here or anywhere else stating his comments were inflammatory and hence almost saying "he had it coming" are woefully missing the point.

Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally. 

That's the problem. The extreme hard Left are incapable of logic, sense and rational when they are unable to argue back. 

Kirk gave millions of people a platform to debate. Whatever their views were. But ultimately, the views are irrelevant. Its the actions that count. And the actions of that shooter and some of the scum bags celebrating show you all you need to know about the state of the Left. 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3762
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 724 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

Fauxstralian wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 12:25 but he sounds like a typical MAGA mouth breather with no respect for anyone not of his ilk
Don't you think that's an odd way to be disrespectful?

He gives people, like you, who disagree with him a stage in front of millions of people to put their point across.

It's not his fault you make yourself look stupid up there.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3593
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 61 times
Been liked: 465 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

No one deserves to die for expressing their beliefs but he sounds like a typical MAGA mouth breather with no respect for anyone not of his ilk
Like Trump 
He is hardly Martin Luther King is he?
Thats the Martin Luther King he described as a myth when telling us that enacting the Civil Rights Act was a ‘huge mistake’
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3762
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 724 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

OK_Guy wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 12:17
hmmm, out of interest... what is you take on the hanging, stoning, & throwing-off buildings/mountains of homosexuals in certain Muslim countries?.
It'll be "let them in, give them free money and housing, let them rape our kids".
OK_Guy
Posts: 134
Old WHO Number: 294855
Has liked: 166 times
Been liked: 72 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post OK_Guy »

 
And what is this Christian perspective on homosexuality he took? Please tell us. Did it involve free will to be stoned to death?
 
 
hmmm, out of interest... what is you take on the hanging, stoning, & throwing-off buildings/mountains of homosexuals in certain Muslim countries?... that is fact, what Mr. Kirk said (or didn't say) was hearsay, would you not agree?

I wasn't a follower, he was too religious for me in his thinking that said, he always came across as reasoned & non-violent.
Massive Attack
Posts: 5833
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3382 times
Been liked: 1708 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Kirk was always prepared to die for his beliefs, so it's not some kind of gotcha moment when the gun 2nd amendment quote by him gets brought up. He'd probably be saying up there, fair enough, it was my time, unfortunately.
,
Posts: 1094
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

"It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights," he said during an April 5, 2023, appearance at the Salt Lake City campus of Awaken Church. "That is a prudent deal."

How can you have a rational debate with a person who thinks rights are god given?



 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3762
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 724 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

Look at them go deflecting!
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3593
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 61 times
Been liked: 465 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Did Mr Kirk also tell us that the Civil Rights Act was a huge mistake?
Also that black women including Michelle Obama lacked the brain power to understand arguments on affirmative action.
He was also nervous when flying with a black pilot … wondering whether they were qualified
And that American culture had been ‘ruined by Jewish money’
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 501
Has liked: 302 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

Pub Bigot" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:48
One Sunny Day" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.


 
He did not. He took a Christian perspective on homosexuality, and also believed in free will. Whether he believed being homosexual leads to damnation is another subject, but he has never endorsed violence. 
And what is this Christian perspective on homosexuality he took? Please tell us. Did it involve free will to be stoned to death?
Pub Bigot
Posts: 746
Old WHO Number: 255703
Has liked: 927 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Pub Bigot »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.

 
He did not. He took a Christian perspective on homosexuality, and also believed in free will. Whether he believed being homosexual leads to damnation is another subject, but he has never endorsed violence. 
Massive Attack
Posts: 5833
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3382 times
Been liked: 1708 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.

 
Who's been saying everyone should care about his death? 
Massive Attack
Posts: 5833
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3382 times
Been liked: 1708 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:18
Massive Attack" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:09 The MSM have 100% played their part. It's not a conspiracy if we all witness the twisted shit they say or do. 
They've spent the last couple of years character assassinating the bloke, so it's hardly surprising one of their mental followers has actually gone ahead with it.

A few (from the likes of CNN) have turned off comments after their faux sympathy statements.  That's just more proof that they simply don't like to hear what they should be hearing.

Yeah Sly News are big on that too, trying to control and shut down discussion on their silly news feeds when it suits them.
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 501
Has liked: 302 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.
 
Pub Bigot
Posts: 746
Old WHO Number: 255703
Has liked: 927 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Pub Bigot »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:18
Massive Attack" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:09 The MSM have 100% played their part. It's not a conspiracy if we all witness the twisted shit they say or do. 
They've spent the last couple of years character assassinating the bloke, so it's hardly surprising one of their mental followers has actually gone ahead with it.

A few (from the likes of CNN) have turned off comments after their faux sympathy statements.  That's just more proof that they simply don't like to hear what they should be hearing.
An idiot an CSMBC or whatever the acronym is has been sacked. 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3762
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 724 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

Massive Attack" wrote: 11 Sep 2025, 11:09 The MSM have 100% played their part. It's not a conspiracy if we all witness the twisted shit they say or do. 
They've spent the last couple of years character assassinating the bloke, so it's hardly surprising one of their mental followers has actually gone ahead with it.

A few (from the likes of CNN) have turned off comments after their faux sympathy statements.  That's just more proof that they simply don't like to hear what they should be hearing.
Post Reply