AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 845
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 35 times
- Been liked: 143 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
-
- Posts: 845
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 35 times
- Been liked: 143 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 12:25 No one deserves to die for expressing their beliefs but he sounds like a typical MAGA mouth breather with no respect for anyone not of his ilk
Like Trump
He is hardly Martin Luther King is he?
Thats the Martin Luther King he described as a myth when telling us that enacting the Civil Rights Act was a ‘huge mistake’
What an appalling comment. A new depth sunk to by Sven, the fake plastic Aussie.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 508 times
- Been liked: 771 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Comma.
I very much doubt that Mr Kirk needed God to tell him that there are only 2 genders and that men can't conceive.
I very much doubt that Mr Kirk needed God to tell him that there are only 2 genders and that men can't conceive.
-
- Posts: 5833
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3382 times
- Been liked: 1708 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Oh yeah, that massive bigoted, misogynistic, racist God and his crew. Jesus Christ...
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally.
Can someone advise us on how to debate with someone whose views are predicated on a god who has bestowed rights on people. How, for example, is believing your existence and actions are governed by a God at all rational?
Can someone advise us on how to debate with someone whose views are predicated on a god who has bestowed rights on people. How, for example, is believing your existence and actions are governed by a God at all rational?
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3762
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 724 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mad Dog" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 12:42One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.
One sunny day
Doubt he did that. Can you back up that claim with an actual quote?
I, too, would like to see this, They-son?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:51Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:48One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.
He did not. He took a Christian perspective on homosexuality, and also believed in free will. Whether he believed being homosexual leads to damnation is another subject, but he has never endorsed violence.
And what is this Christian perspective on homosexuality he took? Please tell us. Did it involve free will to be stoned to death?
You’re not very bright. If he took a stance of no violence, what do you think?
Being a Christian, he sees all of mankind as being built in the image of God, and murdering someone, other than in defence would go against Gods will.
If you’re not aware of his positions on things, you should stop commenting because you’re making yourself look a cսnt.
Being a Christian, he sees all of mankind as being built in the image of God, and murdering someone, other than in defence would go against Gods will.
If you’re not aware of his positions on things, you should stop commenting because you’re making yourself look a cսnt.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.
One sunny day
Doubt he did that. Can you back up that claim with an actual quote?
Doubt he did that. Can you back up that claim with an actual quote?
-
- Posts: 5833
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3382 times
- Been liked: 1708 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
A fucking brave mouth breather if you ask me. Encourages anyone to debate him armed only with a deadly microphone in his hand. Whilst others had to resort to sniper rifles to defeat him is a tad unfair but hey, he's only got himself to blame for his 2nd amendment beliefs..
-
- Posts: 1214
- Old WHO Number: 14551
- Has liked: 439 times
- Been liked: 441 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
It doesn't actually really matter what Kirk's belief's were. Anyone on here or anywhere else stating his comments were inflammatory and hence almost saying "he had it coming" are woefully missing the point.
Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally.
That's the problem. The extreme hard Left are incapable of logic, sense and rational when they are unable to argue back.
Kirk gave millions of people a platform to debate. Whatever their views were. But ultimately, the views are irrelevant. Its the actions that count. And the actions of that shooter and some of the scum bags celebrating show you all you need to know about the state of the Left.
Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally.
That's the problem. The extreme hard Left are incapable of logic, sense and rational when they are unable to argue back.
Kirk gave millions of people a platform to debate. Whatever their views were. But ultimately, the views are irrelevant. Its the actions that count. And the actions of that shooter and some of the scum bags celebrating show you all you need to know about the state of the Left.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3762
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 724 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 12:25 but he sounds like a typical MAGA mouth breather with no respect for anyone not of his ilk
Don't you think that's an odd way to be disrespectful?
He gives people, like you, who disagree with him a stage in front of millions of people to put their point across.
It's not his fault you make yourself look stupid up there.
He gives people, like you, who disagree with him a stage in front of millions of people to put their point across.
It's not his fault you make yourself look stupid up there.
-
- Posts: 3593
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 61 times
- Been liked: 465 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
No one deserves to die for expressing their beliefs but he sounds like a typical MAGA mouth breather with no respect for anyone not of his ilk
Like Trump
He is hardly Martin Luther King is he?
Thats the Martin Luther King he described as a myth when telling us that enacting the Civil Rights Act was a ‘huge mistake’
Like Trump
He is hardly Martin Luther King is he?
Thats the Martin Luther King he described as a myth when telling us that enacting the Civil Rights Act was a ‘huge mistake’
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3762
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 724 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
It'll be "let them in, give them free money and housing, let them rape our kids".
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
And what is this Christian perspective on homosexuality he took? Please tell us. Did it involve free will to be stoned to death?
hmmm, out of interest... what is you take on the hanging, stoning, & throwing-off buildings/mountains of homosexuals in certain Muslim countries?... that is fact, what Mr. Kirk said (or didn't say) was hearsay, would you not agree?
I wasn't a follower, he was too religious for me in his thinking that said, he always came across as reasoned & non-violent.
I wasn't a follower, he was too religious for me in his thinking that said, he always came across as reasoned & non-violent.
-
- Posts: 5833
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3382 times
- Been liked: 1708 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Kirk was always prepared to die for his beliefs, so it's not some kind of gotcha moment when the gun 2nd amendment quote by him gets brought up. He'd probably be saying up there, fair enough, it was my time, unfortunately.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
"It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights," he said during an April 5, 2023, appearance at the Salt Lake City campus of Awaken Church. "That is a prudent deal."
How can you have a rational debate with a person who thinks rights are god given?
How can you have a rational debate with a person who thinks rights are god given?
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3762
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 724 times
-
- Posts: 3593
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 61 times
- Been liked: 465 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Did Mr Kirk also tell us that the Civil Rights Act was a huge mistake?
Also that black women including Michelle Obama lacked the brain power to understand arguments on affirmative action.
He was also nervous when flying with a black pilot … wondering whether they were qualified
And that American culture had been ‘ruined by Jewish money’
Also that black women including Michelle Obama lacked the brain power to understand arguments on affirmative action.
He was also nervous when flying with a black pilot … wondering whether they were qualified
And that American culture had been ‘ruined by Jewish money’
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 501
- Has liked: 302 times
- Been liked: 120 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:48One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.
He did not. He took a Christian perspective on homosexuality, and also believed in free will. Whether he believed being homosexual leads to damnation is another subject, but he has never endorsed violence.
And what is this Christian perspective on homosexuality he took? Please tell us. Did it involve free will to be stoned to death?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.
He did not. He took a Christian perspective on homosexuality, and also believed in free will. Whether he believed being homosexual leads to damnation is another subject, but he has never endorsed violence.
-
- Posts: 5833
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3382 times
- Been liked: 1708 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:41 Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.
Who's been saying everyone should care about his death?
-
- Posts: 5833
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3382 times
- Been liked: 1708 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:18Massive Attack" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:09 The MSM have 100% played their part. It's not a conspiracy if we all witness the twisted shit they say or do.They've spent the last couple of years character assassinating the bloke, so it's hardly surprising one of their mental followers has actually gone ahead with it.
A few (from the likes of CNN) have turned off comments after their faux sympathy statements. That's just more proof that they simply don't like to hear what they should be hearing.
Yeah Sly News are big on that too, trying to control and shut down discussion on their silly news feeds when it suits them.
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 501
- Has liked: 302 times
- Been liked: 120 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:18Massive Attack" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:09 The MSM have 100% played their part. It's not a conspiracy if we all witness the twisted shit they say or do.They've spent the last couple of years character assassinating the bloke, so it's hardly surprising one of their mental followers has actually gone ahead with it.
A few (from the likes of CNN) have turned off comments after their faux sympathy statements. That's just more proof that they simply don't like to hear what they should be hearing.
An idiot an CSMBC or whatever the acronym is has been sacked.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3762
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 724 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 11:09 The MSM have 100% played their part. It's not a conspiracy if we all witness the twisted shit they say or do.
They've spent the last couple of years character assassinating the bloke, so it's hardly surprising one of their mental followers has actually gone ahead with it.
A few (from the likes of CNN) have turned off comments after their faux sympathy statements. That's just more proof that they simply don't like to hear what they should be hearing.
A few (from the likes of CNN) have turned off comments after their faux sympathy statements. That's just more proof that they simply don't like to hear what they should be hearing.