Page 46 of 389
Woke watch
Posted: 27 Jul 2021, 12:33
by arsene york-hunt
"There is a very good section on GB news where the ludicrous idiocies of Wokeness are looked at I thought we would should have one for WHO. I'll start with Baptiste on BBC: In Hungary,an ambassador's family are kidnapped by Islamic terrorists and carry out atrocities. At the end of the last episode Baptiste finds out that it is a false flag operation and conveniently, the real culprits are white supremacists who want to stop all immigration. Coronation Street ITV a gay black footballer is stopped by the police, because he is driving an expensive car. He is pushed to the ground during an altercation, and damages his leg threatening his career. Could have been written by Dawn Butler or a BLM activist."
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 25 Oct 2024, 13:14
by Splodder
BBC News didn't mention that.........
Just looked again. Article disappeared completely now.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 25 Oct 2024, 12:04
by Perry Nium
Both sides are equally tiresome cunts. There needs to be some way of identifying who you're referring to.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 25 Oct 2024, 11:54
by Mike Oxsaw
Cockroaches can thrive in such an environment.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 25 Oct 2024, 11:40
by Leavemyarcelona
Youth 'who arrived on small boat' charged with murder after woman dead
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... menubutton
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 20 Oct 2024, 15:37
by Leavemyarcelona
Send the fuckers to chernobyl
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 20 Oct 2024, 09:20
by Mike Oxsaw
But it's OUR turn to be colonised and become part of someone else's' empire.
Any damn foo' know that.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 20 Oct 2024, 08:28
by goose
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... rseas.html
If you invite thousands of 3rd world inhabitants you get 3rd world towns & cities.
Funny that.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 20 Oct 2024, 06:57
by Mike Oxsaw
I'm sure that some people feel that while some houses have a lawn/garden or there's a public open space on which a home can be built then the UK has room to welcome without fetter anyone from anywhere - it is, after all OUR (not their, mind you) responsibility to do so.
Is nobody looking at the root cause (there's only one) as to why prisons are full to bursting? Why NHS waiting lists are so big? Why the roads & railways are struggling with capacity?
OK, it's a fucking big elephant but it's still in OUR room, even if you can't - or more likely won't - see it.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 20 Oct 2024, 01:54
by SurfaceAgentX2Zero
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑20 Oct 2024, 00:09
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 23:36
'The current editor of Full Fact is an ex-Mirror and Buzzfeed reporter who used to work on the Mirror’s anti-Tory website aimed at young people called “UsvsTh3m”, which often featured online games attacking the Conservatives.Full Fact is a charity with a small output of research compared to its size, funded primarily by big-tech (Google and Facebook) and staffed to a large extent by former public sector workers or ex-reporters from left-wing media. There is no problem with any of this, but broadcasters should be wary of treating the nation’s self-appointed “independent fact checker” as an entirely unbiased source. It’s an odd state of affairs when an organisation could escape scrutiny merely by changing its name.
Full Fact itself complained to Twitter when the Conservative Party tried this trick during an election debate. Are we letting them pull off the exact same grift?'
So there's that...
Does a link straight from the horses mouth, the UN, satisfy you?
You can agree or disagree with the principle of it but them the facts.
"International law does not require that refugees claim asylum in the first country they reach."
So there's that...
https://www.unhcr.org/uk/news/statement-uk-asylum-bill
What's that got to do with them being economic migrants rather than genuine refugees?
Straw man alert!!!!!
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 20 Oct 2024, 00:47
by Leavemyarcelona
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑20 Oct 2024, 00:09
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 23:36
'The current editor of Full Fact is an ex-Mirror and Buzzfeed reporter who used to work on the Mirror’s anti-Tory website aimed at young people called “UsvsTh3m”, which often featured online games attacking the Conservatives.Full Fact is a charity with a small output of research compared to its size, funded primarily by big-tech (Google and Facebook) and staffed to a large extent by former public sector workers or ex-reporters from left-wing media. There is no problem with any of this, but broadcasters should be wary of treating the nation’s self-appointed “independent fact checker” as an entirely unbiased source. It’s an odd state of affairs when an organisation could escape scrutiny merely by changing its name.
Full Fact itself complained to Twitter when the Conservative Party tried this trick during an election debate. Are we letting them pull off the exact same grift?'
So there's that...
Does a link straight from the horses mouth, the UN, satisfy you?
You can agree or disagree with the principle of it but them the facts.
"International law does not require that refugees claim asylum in the first country they reach."
So there's that...
https://www.unhcr.org/uk/news/statement-uk-asylum-bill
The UN is not fit for purpose
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 20 Oct 2024, 00:45
by Leavemyarcelona
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 22:42
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 20:52
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 16:49
Someone's parroting off the incorrect crap they heard from Farage or Tommy many names or the usual far right agitators. There is no legal requirement that asylum seekers can only claim asylum in the nearest country. In fact, most do seek asylum in nearer countries than us and we get far fewer of them than mainland Europe.
The idependant really?
At least you not denied you are part of the reason these atrocities happen
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 20 Oct 2024, 00:09
by One Sunny Day
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 23:36
'The current editor of Full Fact is an ex-Mirror and Buzzfeed reporter who used to work on the Mirror’s anti-Tory website aimed at young people called “UsvsTh3m”, which often featured online games attacking the Conservatives.Full Fact is a charity with a small output of research compared to its size, funded primarily by big-tech (Google and Facebook) and staffed to a large extent by former public sector workers or ex-reporters from left-wing media. There is no problem with any of this, but broadcasters should be wary of treating the nation’s self-appointed “independent fact checker” as an entirely unbiased source. It’s an odd state of affairs when an organisation could escape scrutiny merely by changing its name.
Full Fact itself complained to Twitter when the Conservative Party tried this trick during an election debate. Are we letting them pull off the exact same grift?'
So there's that...
Does a link straight from the horses mouth, the UN, satisfy you?
You can agree or disagree with the principle of it but them the facts.
"International law does not require that refugees claim asylum in the first country they reach."
So there's that...
https://www.unhcr.org/uk/news/statement-uk-asylum-bill
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 23:36
by SurfaceAgentX2Zero
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 22:42
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 20:52
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 16:49
Someone's parroting off the incorrect crap they heard from Farage or Tommy many names or the usual far right agitators. There is no legal requirement that asylum seekers can only claim asylum in the nearest country. In fact, most do seek asylum in nearer countries than us and we get far fewer of them than mainland Europe.
'The current editor of Full Fact is an ex-Mirror and Buzzfeed reporter who used to work on the Mirror’s anti-Tory website aimed at young people called “UsvsTh3m”, which often featured online games attacking the Conservatives.Full Fact is a charity with a small output of research compared to its size, funded primarily by big-tech (Google and Facebook) and staffed to a large extent by former public sector workers or ex-reporters from left-wing media. There is no problem with any of this, but broadcasters should be wary of treating the nation’s self-appointed “independent fact checker” as an entirely unbiased source. It’s an odd state of affairs when an organisation could escape scrutiny merely by changing its name.
Full Fact itself complained to Twitter when the Conservative Party tried this trick during an election debate. Are we letting them pull off the exact same grift?'
So there's that...
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 22:42
by One Sunny Day
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 20:52
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 16:49
nychammer wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 15:35
'Asylum Seekers' should seek said 'Asylum' in the nearest safe country to the one they are fleeing persecution in. Funny how most manage to cross any number of countries to end up in the UK. Is France persecuting them?
Same in he USA, 'Asylum Seekers' are coming from all over the world. 'Asylum' is a term that's abused, when all these people want is a piece of the welfare pie (and I cant blame them for it really)
Someone's parroting off the incorrect crap they heard from Farage or Tommy many names or the usual far right agitators. There is no legal requirement that asylum seekers can only claim asylum in the nearest country. In fact, most do seek asylum in nearer countries than us and we get far fewer of them than mainland Europe.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 20:52
by Leavemyarcelona
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 16:49
nychammer wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 15:35
'Asylum Seekers' should seek said 'Asylum' in the nearest safe country to the one they are fleeing persecution in. Funny how most manage to cross any number of countries to end up in the UK. Is France persecuting them?
Same in he USA, 'Asylum Seekers' are coming from all over the world. 'Asylum' is a term that's abused, when all these people want is a piece of the welfare pie (and I cant blame them for it really)
Someone's parroting off the incorrect crap they heard from Farage or Tommy many names or the usual far right agitators. There is no legal requirement that asylum seekers can only claim asylum in the nearest country. In fact, most do seek asylum in nearer countries than us and we get far fewer of them than mainland Europe.
Parrotting??
why is it incorrect crap?
Far right don't mean nothing now more. It is bothing more then a buzzword you lefty nonces produce ti try and discredit normal folk. I never said there is no legal requirement, i said if they were genuine asylum seekers fleeing a "war" they would be happy enough to claim asylum and be grateful in the nearest country. But as i said they don't, they exploit our generosity and the weakness from numpty's like you. You are part of the reason young girls/children are being groomed up and down the country, soldiers are being attacked in the streets, kids blown up at concerts.
I'm going to his march or Saturday i will send him your best wishes
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 17:17
by Leavemyarcelona
Genuine asylum seekers will claim asylum in the first safe country they pass through. These asylum grifters are from criminal gangs, exploiting our generosity and weakness
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 17:15
by Mike Oxsaw
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 15:09
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 14:54
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 13:21
Seeing this article is talking about genuine asylum seekers, they are not illegal. In fact, illegal migrants are more likely to arrive in the country on a plane, with a student visa, go and work in their cousin's Indian restaurant or market stall (One pound fish guy) and go nowhere near a university, than make a dangerous journey on a rubber dingy across the sea.
Doesn't matter how you spin it, these are people that the nation - any nation - had not expected or could never have anticipated turning up in the planning process of national infrastructure.
To do so would be like London planning for a Volcano to erupt on The Strand - and expecting English taxpayers to pay for insurance against that happening.
Why do you think that prisons are full to overcrowding, NHS waiting times can now be measured in eons or the roads and railways are struggling to cope with the demands of users?
You think that is all the fault of Johnny Foreigner? Deary me.
Are they not all Johnny Foreigners then? If not, who are they?
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 17:12
by Cabbige Savage
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 16:46
Cabbige Savage" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 15:33
Picjkle tell me one suny gay fall to sleep on park BENCH hoping the somali comes to mowf rape him
Can anyone translate this? Sure you aren't a non English speaking asylum seeker, Cabbige?
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 16:49
by One Sunny Day
nychammer wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 15:35
'Asylum Seekers' should seek said 'Asylum' in the nearest safe country to the one they are fleeing persecution in. Funny how most manage to cross any number of countries to end up in the UK. Is France persecuting them?
Same in he USA, 'Asylum Seekers' are coming from all over the world. 'Asylum' is a term that's abused, when all these people want is a piece of the welfare pie (and I cant blame them for it really)
Someone's parroting off the incorrect crap they heard from Farage or Tommy many names or the usual far right agitators. There is no legal requirement that asylum seekers can only claim asylum in the nearest country. In fact, most do seek asylum in nearer countries than us and we get far fewer of them than mainland Europe.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 16:46
by One Sunny Day
Cabbige Savage" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 15:33
Picjkle tell me one suny gay fall to sleep on park BENCH hoping the somali comes to mowf rape him
Can anyone translate this? Sure you aren't a non English speaking asylum seeker, Cabbige?
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 15:35
by nychammer
'Asylum Seekers' should seek said 'Asylum' in the nearest safe country to the one they are fleeing persecution in. Funny how most manage to cross any number of countries to end up in the UK. Is France persecuting them?
Same in he USA, 'Asylum Seekers' are coming from all over the world. 'Asylum' is a term that's abused, when all these people want is a piece of the welfare pie (and I cant blame them for it really)
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 15:33
by Cabbige Savage
Picjkle tell me one suny gay fall to sleep on park BENCH hoping the somali comes to mowf rape him
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 15:09
by One Sunny Day
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 14:54
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 13:21
Seeing this article is talking about genuine asylum seekers, they are not illegal. In fact, illegal migrants are more likely to arrive in the country on a plane, with a student visa, go and work in their cousin's Indian restaurant or market stall (One pound fish guy) and go nowhere near a university, than make a dangerous journey on a rubber dingy across the sea.
Doesn't matter how you spin it, these are people that the nation - any nation - had not expected or could never have anticipated turning up in the planning process of national infrastructure.
To do so would be like London planning for a Volcano to erupt on The Strand - and expecting English taxpayers to pay for insurance against that happening.
Why do you think that prisons are full to overcrowding, NHS waiting times can now be measured in eons or the roads and railways are struggling to cope with the demands of users?
You think that is all the fault of Johnny Foreigner? Deary me.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 15:07
by One Sunny Day
Successful asylum seekers.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 19 Oct 2024, 14:54
by Mike Oxsaw
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 13:21
Seeing this article is talking about genuine asylum seekers, they are not illegal. In fact, illegal migrants are more likely to arrive in the country on a plane, with a student visa, go and work in their cousin's Indian restaurant or market stall (One pound fish guy) and go nowhere near a university, than make a dangerous journey on a rubber dingy across the sea.
Doesn't matter how you spin it, these are people that the nation - any nation - had not expected or could never have anticipated turning up in the planning process of national infrastructure.
To do so would be like London planning for a Volcano to erupt on The Strand - and expecting English taxpayers to pay for insurance against that happening.
Why do you think that prisons are full to overcrowding, NHS waiting times can now be measured in eons or the roads and railways are struggling to cope with the demands of users?
