"There is a very good section on GB news where the ludicrous idiocies of Wokeness are looked at I thought we would should have one for WHO. I'll start with Baptiste on BBC: In Hungary,an ambassador's family are kidnapped by Islamic terrorists and carry out atrocities. At the end of the last episode Baptiste finds out that it is a false flag operation and conveniently, the real culprits are white supremacists who want to stop all immigration. Coronation Street ITV a gay black footballer is stopped by the police, because he is driving an expensive car. He is pushed to the ground during an altercation, and damages his leg threatening his career. Could have been written by Dawn Butler or a BLM activist."
What you on about you mongrel. It is woke because you clowns want them over here. And now another.life as been lost.
You what? I want who here? I don’t want unchecked immigration you dosy cսnt, so how does that make me woke? I’m just not a racist twat and realise people committing crimes doesn’t belong in a woke thread, it belongs in a “pieces of shit who need to go to jail” thread. What was it called when asylum seekers or immigrants committed crimes five years ago before the word started to mean “anything I don’t like.” Is it woke if the immigrant is white?
It is woke people that want them here that is why it is in the woke thread. Racist card doesn't cut.it anymore. Try another. And yes it applies to all
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 21:21
by frank_booth
What you on about you mongrel. It is woke because you clowns want them over here. And now another.life as been lost.
You what? I want who here? I don’t want unchecked immigration you dosy cսnt, so how does that make me woke? I’m just not a racist twat and realise people committing crimes doesn’t belong in a woke thread, it belongs in a “pieces of shit who need to go to jail” thread. What was it called when asylum seekers or immigrants committed crimes five years ago before the word started to mean “anything I don’t like.” Is it woke if the immigrant is white?
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 20:36
by Sydney_Iron
This is quite amusing and a smack in the face for all those lovers of all things woke, gender fluid as well as freedom and democracy who hypocritically wanted the Trump rally at MSG banned on the grounds it was akin to a Nazi rally and only attract an angry mob of far-right bigots, sexists and misogynists, NYPD would be overwhelmed and chaos erupt
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 20:00
by Leavemyarcelona
lowlife wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 19:58
Fast becoming the most predictable and tiresome poster on here.
Both sides of the political divide see what they want to see - that’s a sad fact of life.
Not my problem if you hate the truth ya lefty ponce.
what do they want to see?
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 19:58
by lowlife
Fast becoming the most predictable and tiresome poster on here.
Both sides of the political divide see what they want to see - that’s a sad fact of life.
This thread is has just become a racist rant by old fuckers screaming at clouds. What makes this story “woke” exactly? Has woke become “murders committed by non-white people”? Foreigners coming over here illegally is woke?
You daft cսnt.
What you on about you mongrel. It is woke because you clowns want them over here. And now another.life as been lost.
This thread is has just become a racist rant by old fuckers screaming at clouds. What makes this story “woke” exactly? Has woke become “murders committed by non-white people”? Foreigners coming over here illegally is woke?
You daft cսnt.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 12:46
by Lee Trundle
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 12:43
Exactly why no one takes the msm serious anymore.
It's gone a bit under the radar, but Bezos telling the Washington Post to report things unbiasedly is hopefully a change in the right direction for MSM.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 12:43
by Leavemyarcelona
[url]tel:"Huw Edwards did not break the law. He may have behaved inappropriately.." says mainstream journalist Andrew Pierce on @GBNEWS, shortly after his co-presenter admits she has not watched the film I've been invited on to talk about. And they wonder why the broadcast media is dying. https://t.co/EBGIQcrXQPhttps://www.sotwe.com/tweet/1851231217762582947[/url]
Exactly why no one takes the msm serious anymore.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 25 Oct 2024, 15:29
by twoleftfeet
Her name is/was Rhiannon Whyte.
stabbed to death with a screwdriver by a man who came over on a boat in July.
He was upset, allegedly, by the lack of biscuits in the hotel he was staying in and she worked in.
If you invite thousands of 3rd world inhabitants you get 3rd world towns & cities.
Funny that.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 20 Oct 2024, 06:57
by Mike Oxsaw
I'm sure that some people feel that while some houses have a lawn/garden or there's a public open space on which a home can be built then the UK has room to welcome without fetter anyone from anywhere - it is, after all OUR (not their, mind you) responsibility to do so.
Is nobody looking at the root cause (there's only one) as to why prisons are full to bursting? Why NHS waiting lists are so big? Why the roads & railways are struggling with capacity?
OK, it's a fucking big elephant but it's still in OUR room, even if you can't - or more likely won't - see it.
'The current editor of Full Fact is an ex-Mirror and Buzzfeed reporter who used to work on the Mirror’s anti-Tory website aimed at young people called “UsvsTh3m”, which often featured online games attacking the Conservatives.Full Fact is a charity with a small output of research compared to its size, funded primarily by big-tech (Google and Facebook) and staffed to a large extent by former public sector workers or ex-reporters from left-wing media. There is no problem with any of this, but broadcasters should be wary of treating the nation’s self-appointed “independent fact checker” as an entirely unbiased source. It’s an odd state of affairs when an organisation could escape scrutiny merely by changing its name. Full Fact itself complained to Twitter when the Conservative Party tried this trick during an election debate. Are we letting them pull off the exact same grift?'
So there's that...
Does a link straight from the horses mouth, the UN, satisfy you?
You can agree or disagree with the principle of it but them the facts.
"International law does not require that refugees claim asylum in the first country they reach."
'The current editor of Full Fact is an ex-Mirror and Buzzfeed reporter who used to work on the Mirror’s anti-Tory website aimed at young people called “UsvsTh3m”, which often featured online games attacking the Conservatives.Full Fact is a charity with a small output of research compared to its size, funded primarily by big-tech (Google and Facebook) and staffed to a large extent by former public sector workers or ex-reporters from left-wing media. There is no problem with any of this, but broadcasters should be wary of treating the nation’s self-appointed “independent fact checker” as an entirely unbiased source. It’s an odd state of affairs when an organisation could escape scrutiny merely by changing its name. Full Fact itself complained to Twitter when the Conservative Party tried this trick during an election debate. Are we letting them pull off the exact same grift?'
So there's that...
Does a link straight from the horses mouth, the UN, satisfy you?
You can agree or disagree with the principle of it but them the facts.
"International law does not require that refugees claim asylum in the first country they reach."
Someone's parroting off the incorrect crap they heard from Farage or Tommy many names or the usual far right agitators. There is no legal requirement that asylum seekers can only claim asylum in the nearest country. In fact, most do seek asylum in nearer countries than us and we get far fewer of them than mainland Europe.
Parrotting?? why is it incorrect crap?
Far right don't mean nothing now more. It is bothing more then a buzzword you lefty nonces produce ti try and discredit normal folk. I never said there is no legal requirement, i said if they were genuine asylum seekers fleeing a "war" they would be happy enough to claim asylum and be grateful in the nearest country. But as i said they don't, they exploit our generosity and the weakness from numpty's like you. You are part of the reason young girls/children are being groomed up and down the country, soldiers are being attacked in the streets, kids blown up at concerts.
I'm going to his march or Saturday i will send him your best wishes
Parrotting?? why is it incorrect crap?
Far right don't mean nothing now more. It is bothing more then a buzzword you lefty nonces produce ti try and discredit normal folk. I never said there is no legal requirement, i said if they were genuine asylum seekers fleeing a "war" they would be happy enough to claim asylum and be grateful in the nearest country. But as i said they don't, they exploit our generosity and the weakness from numpty's like you. You are part of the reason young girls/children are being groomed up and down the country, soldiers are being attacked in the streets, kids blown up at concerts.
I'm going to his march or Saturday i will send him your best wishes
'The current editor of Full Fact is an ex-Mirror and Buzzfeed reporter who used to work on the Mirror’s anti-Tory website aimed at young people called “UsvsTh3m”, which often featured online games attacking the Conservatives.Full Fact is a charity with a small output of research compared to its size, funded primarily by big-tech (Google and Facebook) and staffed to a large extent by former public sector workers or ex-reporters from left-wing media. There is no problem with any of this, but broadcasters should be wary of treating the nation’s self-appointed “independent fact checker” as an entirely unbiased source. It’s an odd state of affairs when an organisation could escape scrutiny merely by changing its name. Full Fact itself complained to Twitter when the Conservative Party tried this trick during an election debate. Are we letting them pull off the exact same grift?'
So there's that...
Does a link straight from the horses mouth, the UN, satisfy you?
You can agree or disagree with the principle of it but them the facts.
"International law does not require that refugees claim asylum in the first country they reach."
Someone's parroting off the incorrect crap they heard from Farage or Tommy many names or the usual far right agitators. There is no legal requirement that asylum seekers can only claim asylum in the nearest country. In fact, most do seek asylum in nearer countries than us and we get far fewer of them than mainland Europe.
Parrotting?? why is it incorrect crap?
Far right don't mean nothing now more. It is bothing more then a buzzword you lefty nonces produce ti try and discredit normal folk. I never said there is no legal requirement, i said if they were genuine asylum seekers fleeing a "war" they would be happy enough to claim asylum and be grateful in the nearest country. But as i said they don't, they exploit our generosity and the weakness from numpty's like you. You are part of the reason young girls/children are being groomed up and down the country, soldiers are being attacked in the streets, kids blown up at concerts.
I'm going to his march or Saturday i will send him your best wishes
'The current editor of Full Fact is an ex-Mirror and Buzzfeed reporter who used to work on the Mirror’s anti-Tory website aimed at young people called “UsvsTh3m”, which often featured online games attacking the Conservatives.Full Fact is a charity with a small output of research compared to its size, funded primarily by big-tech (Google and Facebook) and staffed to a large extent by former public sector workers or ex-reporters from left-wing media. There is no problem with any of this, but broadcasters should be wary of treating the nation’s self-appointed “independent fact checker” as an entirely unbiased source. It’s an odd state of affairs when an organisation could escape scrutiny merely by changing its name. Full Fact itself complained to Twitter when the Conservative Party tried this trick during an election debate. Are we letting them pull off the exact same grift?'
'Asylum Seekers' should seek said 'Asylum' in the nearest safe country to the one they are fleeing persecution in. Funny how most manage to cross any number of countries to end up in the UK. Is France persecuting them?
Same in he USA, 'Asylum Seekers' are coming from all over the world. 'Asylum' is a term that's abused, when all these people want is a piece of the welfare pie (and I cant blame them for it really)
Someone's parroting off the incorrect crap they heard from Farage or Tommy many names or the usual far right agitators. There is no legal requirement that asylum seekers can only claim asylum in the nearest country. In fact, most do seek asylum in nearer countries than us and we get far fewer of them than mainland Europe.
Parrotting?? why is it incorrect crap?
Far right don't mean nothing now more. It is bothing more then a buzzword you lefty nonces produce ti try and discredit normal folk. I never said there is no legal requirement, i said if they were genuine asylum seekers fleeing a "war" they would be happy enough to claim asylum and be grateful in the nearest country. But as i said they don't, they exploit our generosity and the weakness from numpty's like you. You are part of the reason young girls/children are being groomed up and down the country, soldiers are being attacked in the streets, kids blown up at concerts.
I'm going to his march or Saturday i will send him your best wishes
'Asylum Seekers' should seek said 'Asylum' in the nearest safe country to the one they are fleeing persecution in. Funny how most manage to cross any number of countries to end up in the UK. Is France persecuting them?
Same in he USA, 'Asylum Seekers' are coming from all over the world. 'Asylum' is a term that's abused, when all these people want is a piece of the welfare pie (and I cant blame them for it really)
Someone's parroting off the incorrect crap they heard from Farage or Tommy many names or the usual far right agitators. There is no legal requirement that asylum seekers can only claim asylum in the nearest country. In fact, most do seek asylum in nearer countries than us and we get far fewer of them than mainland Europe.
Parrotting?? why is it incorrect crap?
Far right don't mean nothing now more. It is bothing more then a buzzword you lefty nonces produce ti try and discredit normal folk. I never said there is no legal requirement, i said if they were genuine asylum seekers fleeing a "war" they would be happy enough to claim asylum and be grateful in the nearest country. But as i said they don't, they exploit our generosity and the weakness from numpty's like you. You are part of the reason young girls/children are being groomed up and down the country, soldiers are being attacked in the streets, kids blown up at concerts.
I'm going to his march or Saturday i will send him your best wishes
