West Ham Online

"A point that seems to of been missed Antonio’s goal could not be seen from any angle whether it definitely came off his stomach or his arm, therefore should never have been disallowed However VAR made the decision to straight up disallow it Souceks goal definitely could be seen to strike his arm, that was the one that was the correct decision However, VAR called over the ref this time to make the decision Does nobody else find that highly suspicious? For me that is what someone would do who’s already made a bent decision and not trying to further put themself in the spotlight"

"The difference was that Antonia scored so any contact with the arm is no goal, even accidental. As Soucek's hit Bowen before it went in it can only be disallowed if the ref thinks it was intentional by Soucek which is why he was sent to the monitor."

"The difference was that Antonia scored so any contact with the arm is no goal, even accidental. As Soucek's hit Bowen before it went in it can only be disallowed if the ref thinks it was intentional by Soucek which is why he was sent to the monitor."