West Ham Online

You didn't answer the question 

Keep dreaming" wrote: ↑23 Oct 2025, 16:39 Serious question here (yeah I know it's hard to take anyone seriously here);

Is there still anyone around here who hasn't signed the petition?

I'm sitting here listening to Bill Gardner, and on his behalf I'm pretty disgusted that no more than 12-15k has signed it.

What the fuck is wrong with West Ham fans?
Won't sign a petition
Won't protest
If they protest, they sell their ticket so the impact is zero.

Numb cunts

Serious question here (yeah I know it's hard to take anyone seriously here);

Is there still anyone around here who hasn't signed the petition?

I'm sitting here listening to Bill Gardner, and on his behalf I'm pretty disgusted that no more than 12-15k has signed it.

What the fuck is wrong with West Ham fans?
Won't sign a petition
Won't protest
If they protest, they sell their ticket so the impact is zero.

Numb cunts

Sherwood steaming in.

Even if we took their loaded results at face value (yeah right!) 85% of 11,900 (max) comes to around 10,000. It means that we currently have over 5,000 and counting more Fans that want them out of our Club altogether than those that were for the move.

Damning numbers when laid out like that and many, many Fans were clearly hoodwinked in to selecting answers that weighted towards the same answer they wanted out in the Media but dressed up slightly differently like the lying, conniving spivs that they are. 

We didn't have to lie or manufacture to achieve this petition result either. That's the difference between our loyal Fanbase and them money grabbing wankers.

Every single Fan that signed the petition would have done so with strong feelings about them fucking off now with zero ambiguity.

Yep, never forget that the collective contempt that we have for our illustrious ownership is a mere drop in the ocean compared to that which they deflect back to us (their critics) and for that matter everybody else connected to the club in any way shape or form

So looking at the current petition signed by over 15,300 Fans I thought it would be good to compare that to another significant survey the Club's propaganda machine commissioned and appointed YoutelluswhatyouwanttohearGov to produce.

The heavily loaded questionnaire was widely accepted at the time in the Media and by the Club itself for being comprehensive that spanned across a wide ranging fanbase and justifying the move with so many apparently onboard. It was a sham of an excecise. I checked how many actually took part and the number was less than 12,000. So if that's the case, then I consider the BSOUT petition to have already achieved it's threshold for widespread discontent aimed at the Board and wishing for them to now leave.

They cannot at all suggest that it's only 15,000 Fans when it blows their shitcunt questionnaire out the water and it aint anywhere near stopping yet with it likely to reach 20,000/30,000+ before the seasons out.

https://www.whufc.com/news/articles/201 ... ns-support

IT'S ALL LIES, LIES, LIES!

AI Overview
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
+3
West Ham United is a private company, so its shares are not traded on a public stock exchange. The club is privately owned, with significant stakes held by David Sullivan and Daniel Křetínský. Recent reports estimate the club's valuation at over $1 billion, with a 25.1% stake held by Vanessa Gold (on behalf of her late father's trust) reportedly valued at up to £250 million. 

• Not publicly traded: West Ham United is a private company, and its shares are not available for public purchase on a stock exchange. 
• Key shareholders: The largest shareholders are David Sullivan and Daniel Křetínský. 
• Valuation: Recent estimates place the club's value at over $1 billion. 
• Stakes being sold: Vanessa Gold has announced her intention to sell her 25.1% stake, which is estimated to be worth up to £250 million. 

Bilionnaire Barrow Boy Sullivan…

Bet Kretinsky and The Gold Family are Pissed at Sullivan and Brady for endangering and devaluing their investments in West Ham…

Hope they do something about it…

Camel is probably right, but everyone connected to this club should make his life here a nightmare.
Those going to matches behaves like we won the champions league last week.
Coins should be thrown constantly, angry songs should be sung , and banners should be show if you entered that stadium.
If you don't care doing anything, then stay at home until this vermin is dead

Read any of the many books on business success and failure and its always about leadership, long term planning and above all else good “execution” of the plan which takes someone with intelligence, experience and great communication who implements an infrastructure, employs the best, “ listens” to their ideas and suggedtions, provides the resources ( budget etc) and then gets the hell out of way!!!   The absolute antithesis of Sullivan.  He is and has for 15 years been the problem.  Worse still his narcissism ( protect his ego as a small man ) means he can never see he is the problem let alone admit it

Sullivan is never selling up when the asset is cheap, eg, relegated. I can 100% guarantee you that.

We are a very unattractive club to buy.  We have few, if any fixed assets, and our working capital (the players) is largely shite.  I believe a sale will become more likely if we are relegated as the price will be lower, and it will depend on the purchaser having heads of agreement signed with the LDC on the purchase of the stadium.

anders, the problem is we have very little overheads apart from the player contracts and the dwarf (via his propaganda team) are already preparing yet more sales, which ideally for them includes bowen. getting 110-120 for jarrod & paqueta will be job done for the little parasite

At what point does God (Sir Trev) gently tap (preferably elbows him in the back of the head) Sullivan on the shoulder and suggest "maybe it's time up now eh, don't you think son?" Get the hint, cսnt, no one wants you here any more..

If we are relegated one way to secure his exit is to boycott club match tickets and merch. Whilst a PL team can survive without match day income, a Championship team likely cannot. 25k in a 65k stadium is also a very bad look. That may force him to sell.

15,309

How the fuck that remains around 15,000 I'll never know. The petition should be rocketing up towards almost double that. Probably make no blind bit of difference but still, that should be much higher. 

What was with that Liberace sparkly jacket and dodgy barnet hair dye of his tonight?!

Fucking weirdo gets dressed by falling in to a lost property box back home before heading to a game.. 

https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/muppe ... 0808084539

He’s Satan incarnate. Fucking miserable saggy faced cսnt. 

Sullivan Senior is an old school criminal
Sullivan Junior is a soft cock velvet slipper wearing child
He could be intimidated out by someone saying boo to him or getting his pronouns wrong

yngwies Cat" wrote: ↑20 Oct 2025, 18:19 Dildo will go, but leave it to Dildo junior 


 

Dildo will go, but leave it to Dildo junior 

 

Far too much stock is put into the fact that Sullivan has an economics degree from LSE so, therefore must be very clever.
Total Bollocks.
Economists tend to fall into three types. Strategists who can be brilliant but sometimes do not get the opportunities so end up nowhere. Clever.
Opportunists who luck into situations and make a lot of money. Lucky.
Opportunists who have a strategic bent who then maximise the benefits of their opportunities, they can make money comparable to a small nation. Very Clever.
Oh, and some of them lie about their credential and go into politics. 
Sullivan is an opportunist. He was lucky/ thick skinned enough to get into porn when it was mainly paper and film, moved on to property when the internet entered the porn market. A strategist would have seen the exponential financial rewards that the internet offered the porn market, Sullivan retrenched to the safer world of property. Profitable for sure but not like being on the ground floor of the internet boom.
He took that property model to Birmingham and West Ham and made money out of it. Could he have made more? 
Yes.
I have no doubt that Sullivan has been, and continues to be, massively successful in taking his opportunities. But, he is limited. He only operates in an analogue, antiquated manner, short term and little strategy beyond turning a deal.
A clever economist would take the opportunity of West Ham as a football club and make it the best it could possibly be to maximise it's value in any sale. If, as seems plausible, the intention all along was to use the club as a vehicle to purchase the real estate on which the Stadium stands as a property deal, probably trying to emulate the O2 arena deal but for offices and housing rather than just an event venue then a better relationship with the landowners would be nurtured to maximise his profits.
As it is the football club appears to be a personal plaything which Sullivan values at a far greater amount than the assets warrant. The relationships with key landowners and stakeholders so poor that they barely speak, let alone entertain letting Sullivan and Co. have the land for a knock down price.
So yes, he has made a lot of money. He has made money out of his opportunities to the extent of becoming a billionaire post selling Upton Park.
But, if he was really that clever then the club would be better run to the extent that it was attractive at top dollar to investors, even near his perception of it's value; a credible structure would exist to facilitate ongoing team success and minimise patron protest which draws negative attention and devalues the asset. A plan would be in place to acquire the stadium and a development plan for the stadium (even relocation), training facilities, etc. whilst maximising the real estate value. The stadium sits on a site that could, very easily, accommodate more development.
Running the club like a circus; taking annual payday loans to pay off last years loans; pleading poverty despite the lofty wealth of the board; making repeated bad business decisions in key appointments and annoying landowners and supporters alike is not very clever.
It smacks of "doing it because I can." 
Yes, he already has, and will make more than most of us can even dream of when he does fuck off but if he was truly that smart, his wealth would be eye watering.            

The best outcome from the protests is Sullivan selling up and jogging on but Hammers United and FAB have been realistic enough to say that they have no confidence in their day to day running of the club ( short term, no plan or vision, appalling recruitment and wasting millions as a result etc etc ) so would settle for Sullivan and Brady resigning from those roles and implementing a proper, autonomous CEO and DOF ( and other supporting roles that every other top flight club in Europe has) . All part of a proper infrastructure for the long term. Target professional people who have experience and a track record of success defining, implementing a strategy, philosophy for the next 5 - 10 years.  

With enough pressure and at Sullivan’s age, it has a more realitic chance of happening. Get it right and the value of the club increases so a “win win”.  Sullivan wont sell and has materially over valued the club. Allied to having no ground and ability to generate revenues from it makes us unattractive to investors etc.   

The other problem of having an awful, incompetent, owner with narcissistic traits is that he and his family see the club as their hobby getting involved with agents etc. So while I think aiming to get Sullivan to step away from daily running of the club is more of a realistic aim, even that is made harder by a man and his family who fill their days pretending to run a football club.