Not a cunting dickie bird from that racist transparent grade A cսnt which says it all.
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 26 Jul 2025, 04:33
by XKhammer
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025, 02:24
Apparently a multiple convicted foreign felon rapist is going to be visiting London in September and we're going to pay millions of pounds to roll out the red carpet for him.I wonder if all these Epping protesters are going to show up there to protect our kids?
I don't like Trump and yes he's a sex case,but he's no danger to our kids,but he's right about illegal immigration which is an invasion of Europe
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 26 Jul 2025, 02:24
by One Sunny Day
Apparently a multiple convicted foreign felon rapist is going to be visiting London in September and we're going to pay millions of pounds to roll out the red carpet for him.I wonder if all these Epping protesters are going to show up there to protect our kids?
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 19:10
Not even by stealth, it's done in plain sight that's aided and abetted by our own Government that hates it's own Country and people.
I don't think that anyone in the (current) government have any idea of the sacrifices and effort put in (in the days before the internet, when both Radio & TV were leading edge technology) to get the welfare state up and running in the UK, followed by the NHS (they'll all know about WW1 & WW2 when political points are available, though - wars are SEXY!). That stance from a Labour government is foul beyond belief.
They also seem to be importing a lower class of population that also has no idea how these societal concepts came about, and, equally important, no ties to the past - ties that we all have through just being around our (immediate) ancestors.
With such a set-up, the population will be easy to manipulate; just like some people appear to (sincerely and genuinely) believe that food comes only from shops & supermarkets, these new-comers to the UK will believe that wealth (and therefore their money) comes (only) from the government.
The government threaten to cut off their money stream, they'll do whatever parliament bids.
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 19:21
by Gank
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 19:06
Gadaffi was a great bloke
Agreed. When he broke the javelin world record for us back in 1986 he secured a place in my heart forever, and winning gold for us makes him a better Brit than half the people on WHO.
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 19:10
by Massive Attack
Not even by stealth, it's done in plain sight that's aided and abetted by our own Government that hates it's own Country and people.
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 19:06
by BerlingtonBertie
Gadaffi was a great bloke
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 19:06
by Gaffer58
Colonel Gadaffi sad many years ago that Islam cannot conquer Europe by force but will by stealth.
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 15:11
Not even the Geese (So watch your back, Goose!)..
V
Forgetting it’s a Goose, and forgetting they’ll get away with any crime because it will be disregarded as a non-crime - Why the fuck is the ruling class allowing a once stable nation to be flooded by the third world?
The talking heads in the media and the mess in Downing Street are going to create the far-right mythical beast into a real thing and then when it does, there will be murders.
I can foresee some sort of Balkanisation or no-go areas based on physical characteristics or particular beliefs soon.
And if you tolerate this then you children will be next.
Wait for the big push for Sharia law, It’s coming. Just a matter of time.
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 17:55
by Massive Attack
Ashfields decided they've had enough of it..
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 17:17
by Massive Attack
Anything goes now mate...
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 16:55
by Pub Bigot
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 15:11
Not even the Geese (So watch your back, Goose!)..
V
Forgetting it’s a Goose, and forgetting they’ll get away with any crime because it will be disregarded as a non-crime - Why the fuck is the ruling class allowing a once stable nation to be flooded by the third world?
The talking heads in the media and the mess in Downing Street are going to create the far-right mythical beast into a real thing and then when it does, there will be murders.
I can foresee some sort of Balkanisation or no-go areas based on physical characteristics or particular beliefs soon.
And if you tolerate this then you children will be next.
No one and nowhere is safe anymore in this Country.
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 16:05
by Mike Oxsaw
The government/tourist industry et al need to stop bigging the fucking country up for a few years - THAT is what attracts so many people to get here by hook or by crook; streets paved with gold (or ponds full of geese, whatever floats your boat).
Those living in gated communities or areas the average person can never afford to live might "never have had it so good" and life is an absolute peach...for them. The rest of the country, however, has to put up with the shit they dump on us.
Don't worry about putting investment off. These people, if they're thinking of investing, will do their own due diligence on the country without any creepy, arse-licking comments from MPs or ministers needed; they will, however take any "financial incentives to invest", that in these economically constrained times, would be money better spent on extra NHS incubators for premature babies..
only1billybonds wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 10:36
Yep, the social credit system has been spoken about for a while now, haven't seen many arguments as to why it would be a good thing.
A social credit (Universal Basic Income) set up could work (in the UK) provided there was no political/government/(big) business influence or interference.
The government could (easily) supply information on those eligible/ineligible, along with their reasons for their decisions and a 100% independent & transparent arbitration process makes the final, legally binding decision.
Everybody would need (independently) verifiable proof of identification (ID cards?) to be considered in the first place.
Interesting that their description isn’t detailed. I mean, when compared to the wanker who ran fans celebrating the Scouse parade down, they couldn’t tell us quickly enough what the description of the driver was.
Anyone with half a brain can see where this "identification policy" is going: if the authorities don't immediately identify the perpetrator as white, social media will clam they are illegal immigrants/black/Asian/Muslim/all of the above. It's one of the benefits government licenced social media gives us.
Seems either way, the government are sitting on a powder-keg of their own making and illuminating it with a blowlamp.
What to do?
Well permanently remove the causes of crime from society, obviously, but there will always be some shouty cսnt who objects to that because it impacts on THEIR "human rights" or some other wishy-washy, self-centred argument that will tie up such procedures for years.
The concern is are additional powers the government legislates for, for a safer and more secure society, or big brother the population by having everyone under constant surveillance.
I don’t trust the government, and everything is gearing up to walk us to a Chinese style surveillance state with a social credit system, but with none of the benefits, as few as there are.
With regard to surveillance, I think that field was crossed a long time ago.
I use "field" rather than "line" here because there was not a single point or event that got us here, more like a death by 1,000 (paper) cuts.
Walk through London (or any town/city in the UK) and take a look at how many CCTV cameras there are - not just in public places like streets, stations & trains/buses, but also shops, bars, clubs and restaurants.
The authorities can request access to images recorded on/by those devices at any time and for reasons they could just make up on the spur of the moment.
Even at the London Stadium, you're all under the watchful eye of CCTV (and I hope you feel so much more secure, rather than being intruded upon, for being so).
The big issue is how data from those cameras is used/processed once it is in the hands of the authorities; the "security" angle ensures that the cameras themselves will never be removed - in fact some insurance policies demand their presence & operation - but the uses the data is put need to be tightly controlled, even to the extent of a senior judge issuing a prior warrant for it's use.
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 10:36
by only1billybonds
Yep, the social credit system has been spoken about for a while now, haven't seen many arguments as to why it would be a good thing.
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 08:16
Hadn’t seen that
Just googled & 3 men in their 20’s is the only description
Doesnt bring him back but obviously all should get life
Interesting that their description isn’t detailed. I mean, when compared to the wanker who ran fans celebrating the Scouse parade down, they couldn’t tell us quickly enough what the description of the driver was.
Anyone with half a brain can see where this "identification policy" is going: if the authorities don't immediately identify the perpetrator as white, social media will clam they are illegal immigrants/black/Asian/Muslim/all of the above. It's one of the benefits government licenced social media gives us.
Seems either way, the government are sitting on a powder-keg of their own making and illuminating it with a blowlamp.
What to do?
Well permanently remove the causes of crime from society, obviously, but there will always be some shouty cսnt who objects to that because it impacts on THEIR "human rights" or some other wishy-washy, self-centred argument that will tie up such procedures for years.
The concern is are additional powers the government legislates for, for a safer and more secure society, or big brother the population by having everyone under constant surveillance.
I don’t trust the government, and everything is gearing up to walk us to a Chinese style surveillance state with a social credit system, but with none of the benefits, as few as there are.
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 08:16
Hadn’t seen that
Just googled & 3 men in their 20’s is the only description
Doesnt bring him back but obviously all should get life
Interesting that their description isn’t detailed. I mean, when compared to the wanker who ran fans celebrating the Scouse parade down, they couldn’t tell us quickly enough what the description of the driver was.
Anyone with half a brain can see where this "identification policy" is going: if the authorities don't immediately identify the perpetrator as white, social media will clam they are illegal immigrants/black/Asian/Muslim/all of the above. It's one of the benefits government licenced social media gives us.
Seems either way, the government are sitting on a powder-keg of their own making and illuminating it with a blowlamp.
What to do?
Well permanently remove the causes of crime from society, obviously, but there will always be some shouty cսnt who objects to that because it impacts on THEIR "human rights" or some other wishy-washy, self-centred argument that will tie up such procedures for years.
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 08:39
by Pub Bigot
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 08:16
Hadn’t seen that
Just googled & 3 men in their 20’s is the only description
Doesnt bring him back but obviously all should get life
Interesting that their description isn’t detailed. I mean, when compared to the wanker who ran fans celebrating the Scouse parade down, they couldn’t tell us quickly enough what the description of the driver was.
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 08:16
by Fauxstralian
Hadn’t seen that
Just googled & 3 men in their 20’s is the only description
Doesnt bring him back but obviously all should get life
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 08:09
by Trilby55
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025, 06:47
I wouldn’t play down any murder & would never defend Khan as I think he is a dismal incompetent. Ludicrous that he was knighted
The only reason he is Mayor is because the Tories somehow to manage to come up with candidates who couldn’t find their arse with both hands
This murder got probably more publicity is that it happened in a very rich area in the street where you’d hope you’d be safe
Not heard any update but would have thought there would have been extensive cctv around there to trace the killer
They have made arrests and it looks like they have those responsible. It will be a huge funeral round here for the young fella . His dad is West Ham nuts .
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 07:58
by Moncurs Putting Iron
Luxury or high end watch theft has been a problem since 2022, New York the same.
Not deflecting or making any political point, merely pointing out that has been going on for a while
Re: Lawless London
Posted: 25 Jul 2025, 06:47
by Fauxstralian
I wouldn’t play down any murder & would never defend Khan as I think he is a dismal incompetent. Ludicrous that he was knighted
The only reason he is Mayor is because the Tories somehow to manage to come up with candidates who couldn’t find their arse with both hands
This murder got probably more publicity is that it happened in a very rich area in the street where you’d hope you’d be safe
Not heard any update but would have thought there would have been extensive cctv around there to trace the killer
