Not changing the subject at all - see, Yaxley-Lennon is a niche political agitator and you and all the other gamma-brains out there are that niche.
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 12:34
by Leavemyarcelona
Hammer and Pickle" wrote: โ29 Oct 2024, 12:30
When an alpha lobster gets beaten to his mating partner by another alpha lobster, his brain literally collapses so he can be a gamma lobster. This is what is happening to Milly right now.
What are you on about?
Why are you trying to change the subject?
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 12:30
by Hammer and Pickle
When an alpha lobster gets beaten to his mating partner by another alpha lobster, his brain literally collapses so he can be a gamma lobster. This is what is happening to Milly right now.
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 12:23
by Leavemyarcelona
Hammer and Pickle" wrote: โ29 Oct 2024, 12:16
I don't give a toss what name he goes by.
Obviously you do. C'mon be honest. So what is yours and OSD first name
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: โ29 Oct 2024, 11:54
Do people use the surname "Yaxley Lennon" to convey some sort of elitist, entitled establishment status on him?
When I married my first wife (both from Romford) we adopted a double-barrelled name - nothing "fancy Dan" about it at all - clearly stated that marriage didn't imply ownership.
ย
Stephen Yaxley Lennon is his birth name. Tommy Robinson is his adopted name. I see many of his supporters prefer to use someones birth name when they're trans so don't see why anyone should complain when people do the same to Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon.
Yet you are ok calling trans women women and vice versa, but you are not ok if someone decides if they want to be called something else. Same as Muhammed Ali/Cassius Clay. So i will ask once again, what is yours and Hammer and Sickles real names?ย
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 11:59
by One Sunny Day
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: โ29 Oct 2024, 11:54
Do people use the surname "Yaxley Lennon" to convey some sort of elitist, entitled establishment status on him?
When I married my first wife (both from Romford) we adopted a double-barrelled name - nothing "fancy Dan" about it at all - clearly stated that marriage didn't imply ownership.
ย
Stephen Yaxley Lennon is his birth name. Tommy Robinson is his adopted name. I see many of his supporters prefer to use someones birth name when they're trans so don't see why anyone should complain when people do the same to Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon.
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 11:54
by Mike Oxsaw
Do people use the surname "Yaxley Lennon" to convey some sort of elitist, entitled establishment status on him?
When I married my first wife (both from Romford) we adopted a double-barrelled name - nothing "fancy Dan" about it at all - clearly stated that marriage didn't imply ownership.
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 11:45
by Hammer and Pickle
What has my real name got to do with the truth and why Yaxley Lennon got put away for contempt because you claim he was telling it?
Are you having some sort of a cognitive breakdown?
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 11:36
by Leavemyarcelona
Hammer and Pickle" wrote: โ29 Oct 2024, 11:30
Is Yaxley-Lennon being SILENCED as well?
No because the truth is out there now. Are you going to watch it? What is your real name by the way?ย
zebthecat wrote: โ29 Oct 2024, 08:31
Good.
The surprise is that he broke the law and owned it.
What law did he break? He got done for contempt, basically showing the truth which was against the establishments wishes.
Are you trying to say he was gaoled for telling the truth? Why not take the opportunity to tell us that truth now?
Well if you watch is documentary SILENCED all will be revealed in there. Eyewitness accounts, teachers/caretakers who knew the little shit. How Kirklees council paid off people to keep quiet. You reckon you can swallow your pride and watch it? If not, then you continue sucking up to politicians and the legacy media.
zebthecat wrote: โ29 Oct 2024, 08:31
Good.
The surprise is that he broke the law and owned it.
What law did he break? He got done for contempt, basically showing the truth which was against the establishments wishes.
Are you trying to say he was gaoled for telling the truth? Why not take the opportunity to tell us that truth now?
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 11:03
by Leavemyarcelona
Reform are finished, throwing their voters under the bus
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 11:00
by Leavemyarcelona
zebthecat wrote: โ29 Oct 2024, 08:31
Good.
The surprise is that he broke the law and owned it.
What law did he break? He got done for contempt, basically showing the truth which was against the establishments wishes.
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 09:58
by Hammer and Pickle
Iโm sure there is plenty of good hard archived evidence that Farage and Reform UK are Kremlin instruments. But then there are many ways of dealing with that other than putting people away or banning parties.
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 09:51
by ,
Sydney, what are the signs that make you think the government might go after Farage and also seek to ban Reform UK?
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 08:31
by zebthecat
Good.
The surprise is that he broke the law and owned it.
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 29 Oct 2024, 00:30
by Sydney_Iron
All they are doing is turning him into a martyr, and if he does get hurt or killed in jail watch it really kick off in the UK, whatever you think of him, if you can't see the hypocrisy of the UK government and authorities you need to have a word with yourself.
Disgrace that this 2-tiered enforcement of the law is occurring but being denied, anyone who they remotely suspected or involved or sympathizing with those criticizing immigration or Islam and the grooming gangs and they are swiftly delt with and jailed, YET those 2 scumbags who assaulted police at Manchester airport are walking the streets, the Cops involved still under investigation with their careers in tatters.
Wont Suprise me if they go after Farage or even try and ban Reform such is the way this Labour government is moving.
wils wrote: โ28 Oct 2024, 22:28
He came back to the country knowing he was going to prison. Whatever you think of his politics that's quite a brave thing to do considering what's waiting for him inside prison. He believes in what he is doing and puts himself in harm's way.
Personally I think he isn't helping himself much in what he wants to achieve and could be a bit smarter in the way he goes about it. I watched his banned video and, although sceptical, I ended up quite sympathetic to what he is saying. From TR's video the Syrian boy, Jamal Hijazi, who took him to court (or maybe activists took him to court? I don't know!) wasn't portrayed as innocently as the media had portrayed him to be and the boy who was expelled from school for beating Jamal up looks like the real wronged party.
However, there is a very good video of someone going through the details of the 2021 judgement against TR when he lost his libel case.ย It makes very clear what TR got wrong and why Jamal won his libel case but it may still leave some wondering why the media were not reporting the full circumstances leading up to the fight seen in the video. TR believed too many people's stories who were pushing their own agendas and he was naive about how courts work. He should have got some good legal advice before deciding to fight it. From listening to the video above about the judgement it seems quite obvious he didn't.
At least you watched the video
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 28 Oct 2024, 22:28
by wils
He came back to the country knowing he was going to prison. Whatever you think of his politics that's quite a brave thing to do considering what's waiting for him inside prison. He believes in what he is doing and puts himself in harm's way.
Personally I think he isn't helping himself much in what he wants to achieve and could be a bit smarter in the way he goes about it. I watched his banned video and, although sceptical, I ended up quite sympathetic to what he is saying. From TR's video the Syrian boy, Jamal Hijazi, who took him to court (or maybe activists took him to court? I don't know!) wasn't portrayed as innocently as the media had portrayed him to be and the boy who was expelled from school for beating Jamal up looks like the real wronged party.
However, there is a very good video of someone going through the details of the 2021 judgement against TR when he lost his libel case.ย It makes very clear what TR got wrong and why Jamal won his libel case but it may still leave some wondering why the media were not reporting the full circumstances leading up to the fight seen in the video. TR believed too many people's stories who were pushing their own agendas and he was naive about how courts work. He should have got some good legal advice before deciding to fight it. From listening to the video above about the judgement it seems quite obvious he didn't.
Takashi Miike" wrote: โ28 Oct 2024, 16:37
another 2TK quick sentence? any news on the pair of old bill beating ragheads? or is communist Kier only allowed to jail the indigenous population?
Actually this case has been running for ages
Very harsh sentence seeing as he pleaded guilty,but he's an idiot for ignoring the injunctions
He should stick to exsposing the Asian nonce gangs,poltics hes thick as shit
Spell politics again?
You rather the truth be kept away?ย
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 28 Oct 2024, 21:23
by XKhammer
Takashi Miike" wrote: โ28 Oct 2024, 16:37
another 2TK quick sentence? any news on the pair of old bill beating ragheads? or is communist Kier only allowed to jail the indigenous population?
Actually this case has been running for ages
Very harsh sentence seeing as he pleaded guilty,but he's an idiot for ignoring the injunctions
He should stick to exsposing the Asian nonce gangs,poltics hes thick as shit
Re: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted: 28 Oct 2024, 20:41
by goose
Takashi Miike" wrote: โ28 Oct 2024, 16:37
another 2TK quick sentence? any news on the pair of old bill beating ragheads? or is communist Kier only allowed to jail the indigenous population?