West Ham Online

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.

You know the chant..

"SAY IT LOUD, SAY IT CLEAR, REFUGEES ARE WELCOME HERE"

.. I could not agree more. Not even being sarcastic. I have genuinely always agreed with every soap dodging liberal nutter that screams it and have done so long before they recently did. My argument back though is that every single 1 that attempts to travel across the English Channel over by boat is not a Refugee. And the simple explanation is that every single one has had to travel through numerous safe Countries to attempt it. And if that is the case, then they have no need to get to us across water illegally. All it proves is that they are in fact economic migrants who think they can understandably get a better life on benefits, board etc than the other safe Countries provide, picking and choosing where to settle when that's not what genuine refugees do. Just happy they are finally safe in any of the other safe Countries they've travelled in to. 

So what you do is take the moral high ground alongside the great unwashed Leftys using their own slogan whilst explaining that none crossing by boat can be having already entered many other safe Countries already. It's illogical nonsense to say they are still Refugees seeking to escape war or persecution from mainland Europe. That is unless I've missed something which I may have but that's my take on it.

The final point I'd add that I think any sane right minded person who wants to stop the dangerous crossings is saying how irresponsible it is for the Left to encourage them risking their lives drowning when they are already safe. The right should be making that point clear that by preventing them crossing we are in fact wanting to protect and prevent serious harm to those that wish to attempt to cross. They just don't make that argument strong enough in the Media though getting trapped instead in the typical endless back and forth over failed policies to stop it. It's far more humane to say we don't want them to cross so they dont risk death needlessly and last time I checked there have been 152 reported deaths in the Channel to date since it began in 2018. That's disgusting when you think about it, yet the left still encourage them over. Warped logic. 
 

Logical explanation..

I saw someone explain the current situation quite well recently. The nation state is now two entities: the nation and the state. Their interests no longer align. The state no longer shares the interests of the nation. The nation and the state are now at odds with each other.

It staggers me that there are still people out there who willingly defend these cunts with their shithouse placards and calling everyone "far right"

12-year-old raped in Warwickshire:

Police refused to disclose further details, saying: "Once someone is charged with an offence, we follow national guidance. This guidance does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy98l9j913vo

But in Liverpool they gave the suspects ethnicity and nationality straight away and said:

In a report published earlier this month into last summer's events, His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services said the police service "must do more to communicate online" and "fill the information void with the truth"."Forces must provide a true narrative online to reach people who may be searching for information," it added.The report went on to say: "The police service must communicate the facts. Repeatedly, continuously and effectively as circumstances change and develop."If not, others will take over the narrative with overwhelming amounts of online content. And some of this may be false or harmful to the police response and the communities the police are there to protect."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgv4ddpyddo


So what's going on?

It's not even a joke, it's a tragic fact.

The Country(ies) are going to go pop soon..

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 19:59 I'm sure all the Deliveroo Drivers 'Asylum seekers' knew upon arrival about a Section 42 law clause in case they ever felt distress and alarm... 

*Keir Stasi gets on Whatasap Pig Groupchat*

KS - Tell all Officers to disperse of Far Right Hooligan Nans etc in the area now due to local Service Users feeling distressed and alarm using a Section 42. Just trust me.

*As the Service Users continue to peer out their 4 star Bedroom windows all relaxed and laughing flicking V's down below*

I'm sure all the Deliveroo Drivers 'Asylum seekers' knew upon arrival about a Section 42 law clause in case they ever felt distress and alarm... 

*Keir Stasi gets on Whatasap Pig Groupchat*

KS - Tell all Officers to disperse of Far Right Hooligan Nans etc in the area now due to local Service Users feeling distressed and alarm using a Section 42. Just trust me.

*As the Service Users continue to peer out their 4 star Bedroom windows all relaxed and laughing flicking V's down below*

So you are no longer allowed to peaceful protest in the UK.

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 17:27 The Cover-Up of raped 12yo girls continues to this very day..

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailym ... -town.html

Nutsin wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 17:24

The Cover-Up of raped 12yo girls continues to this very day..

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailym ... -town.html

Tensions have escalated where the Far Right are really kicking off now outside the Canary Wharf Hotel..

Well done lads.

Nutsin wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:16

XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 13:52

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 13:33

 

I never offered an opinion on Italian law on this matter for any view point. I just questioned why YOU knew it DBS... 

Only a noncey degenerate would think, and be inclined, to google it.

Your search history must look worse than Gary Glitter's.

Why you "butt" in then?
Clearly sticking up for loose goose or just digging me out for sake of it?
Sicko 

The way I read it he was digging out Goose for posting the age of consent in certain US states.

I mean the fact that Goose won’t accept the obvious that Sharia Councils could be and probably are in some cases breeding grounds for grooming gangs is in itself a bit Noncy.

To be so blinkered in believing that these Sharia courncils should be trusted and are all on the level is beyond gullible. It’s the kind of determined argument you’d expect from a Nonce.

Nutsin wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:46

goose wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:39

Nutsin wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:36

Fuck me you’re getting more openly noncy with every passing post.

You got something you wanna share with us all?
sounds like you’re getting ready for a confession.

By pointing out that you live in a country that allows child marriage? Righto.

You got something you want to confess son?

goose wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:39

Nutsin wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:36

goose wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:20

Only one nonce on this site. A ginger one who brags about abusing underage girls in Cambodia.

You spend your days moaning about Islam while ignoring that you live somewhere that child marriage is commonplace. While similarly ignoring the fact that the US has the same ‘close in age’ exemptions.

Fuck me you’re getting more openly noncy with every passing post.

You got something you wanna share with us all?
sounds like you’re getting ready for a confession.

By pointing out that you live in a country that allows child marriage? Righto.

Nutsin wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:36

goose wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:20

Nutsin wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:16

The way I read it he was digging out Goose for posting the age of consent in certain US states.

I mean the fact that Goose won’t accept the obvious that Sharia Councils could be and probably are in some cases breeding grounds for grooming gangs is in itself a bit Noncy.

To be so blinkered in believing that these Sharia courncils should be trusted and are all on the level is beyond gullible. It’s the kind of determined argument you’d expect from a Nonce.

Only one nonce on this site. A ginger one who brags about abusing underage girls in Cambodia.

You spend your days moaning about Islam while ignoring that you live somewhere that child marriage is commonplace. While similarly ignoring the fact that the US has the same ‘close in age’ exemptions.

Fuck me you’re getting more openly noncy with every passing post.

You got something you wanna share with us all?
sounds like you’re getting ready for a confession.

goose wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:20

Nutsin wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:16

XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 13:52

Why you "butt" in then?
Clearly sticking up for loose goose or just digging me out for sake of it?
Sicko 

The way I read it he was digging out Goose for posting the age of consent in certain US states.

I mean the fact that Goose won’t accept the obvious that Sharia Councils could be and probably are in some cases breeding grounds for grooming gangs is in itself a bit Noncy.

To be so blinkered in believing that these Sharia courncils should be trusted and are all on the level is beyond gullible. It’s the kind of determined argument you’d expect from a Nonce.

Only one nonce on this site. A ginger one who brags about abusing underage girls in Cambodia.

You spend your days moaning about Islam while ignoring that you live somewhere that child marriage is commonplace. While similarly ignoring the fact that the US has the same ‘close in age’ exemptions.

Nutsin wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 15:16

XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 13:52

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 13:33

 

I never offered an opinion on Italian law on this matter for any view point. I just questioned why YOU knew it DBS... 

Only a noncey degenerate would think, and be inclined, to google it.

Your search history must look worse than Gary Glitter's.

Why you "butt" in then?
Clearly sticking up for loose goose or just digging me out for sake of it?
Sicko 

The way I read it he was digging out Goose for posting the age of consent in certain US states.

I mean the fact that Goose won’t accept the obvious that Sharia Councils could be and probably are in some cases breeding grounds for grooming gangs is in itself a bit Noncy.

To be so blinkered in believing that these Sharia courncils should be trusted and are all on the level is beyond gullible. It’s the kind of determined argument you’d expect from a Nonce.

XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 13:52

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 13:33

XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 13:23

Took 10 seconds to find out ThickClit 
You think I'm wrong to point out what a 3rd world country Italy is and shut up that moron goose?
Looks like you're cheerleading noncing in Italy 

 

I never offered an opinion on Italian law on this matter for any view point. I just questioned why YOU knew it DBS... 

Only a noncey degenerate would think, and be inclined, to google it.

Your search history must look worse than Gary Glitter's.

Why you "butt" in then?
Clearly sticking up for loose goose or just digging me out for sake of it?
Sicko 

XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 14:53

goose wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 14:38

XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 14:33

Nope it's 14 which you have stated is acceptable because other countries have similar laws...sicko 

Nope. The law is 16. 
exemptions can be made within that for people close in age (providing it’s consensual and no position of power is held) as I explained to you. You should probably read this stuff before embarrassing yourself.

what you did to that Cambodian girl isn’t acceptable in any country.

Exemptions lol ...which means age of consent is 14 lol 

goose does this on every thread,never ever admits he's wrong and just bombards with reply after reply and of course the nonce/sex case stuff...Mr Angry...understandable because if l was an Eyetie soap dodging sexcase at risk of returning home and being castrated l would be pretty pissed off as well 

goose wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 14:38

XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 14:33

goose wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025, 14:30

Did you find it acceptable to rape an underage Cambodian girl?

The age of consent is 16 in Italy you div. Maybe get a responsible adult to explain it to you.

Nope it's 14 which you have stated is acceptable because other countries have similar laws...sicko 

Nope. The law is 16. 
exemptions can be made within that for people close in age (providing it’s consensual and no position of power is held) as I explained to you. You should probably read this stuff before embarrassing yourself.

what you did to that Cambodian girl isn’t acceptable in any country.