West Ham Online

goose wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 08:33 I like the away, reminds me of Hugo Porfirio.

Same in the snow. Ecru vintage.

Tomshardware wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025, 09:03 12 million a year is neither here nor there in terms of a premier league finances.   The club would have got far more respect from fans if they had put the Bobby Moore charity on the shirts.   

Huffers wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025, 05:33 Barcelona never had a sponsor on their shirt and the fans were not accepting of the idea of having one.

Eventually they put unicef on there to make it look like they were doing a good thing and no fans can argue with it.

Then of course, once fans were used to a logo on their shirts, an actual sponsor can be brought in.

Gank wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 19:20

On The Ball" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 17:23 NO, these aren't the kits - this is someone doing a mock-up based on third-hand descriptions so don't take them as gospel.

That said - they're not far off. The ecru one is incredibly popular and one that's long been demanded to return. The home is obviously awful and lacks blue, but the entire kit was previously completely claret - so be grateful that that got changed.

The Club were excited that Betway was ending a year before the ban as it got them out ahead of the rest of the pack in the hunt for a non-gambling sponsor. So presumably Boyle have offered a lot more than anyone else to lose that advantage.....

It's £12.5million for this season, ending if we stay up. If we go down it's a further two years at £9.2million with a severance clause if we go straight back up 

There's no betting firm ban in the Championship.

stubbo-admin wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025, 19:09 Newsflash...it's not Kappa....but in my opinion they look shite.

Anyway, supposedly these are very very close to what the actual kits look like.

Mock up kits are accurate.jpeg

Hate the claret socks. Looks like a Burnley kit.

On The Ball" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 17:23 NO, these aren't the kits - this is someone doing a mock-up based on third-hand descriptions so don't take them as gospel.

That said - they're not far off. The ecru one is incredibly popular and one that's long been demanded to return. The home is obviously awful and lacks blue, but the entire kit was previously completely claret - so be grateful that that got changed.

The Club were excited that Betway was ending a year before the ban as it got them out ahead of the rest of the pack in the hunt for a non-gambling sponsor. So presumably Boyle have offered a lot more than anyone else to lose that advantage.....

Tomshardware wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 16:53

El Scorchio" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 10:21

Mex Martillo" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 06:39 I thought the idea was not to be sponsored by a betting company? Isn't there a ban probably coming in?
Not a lot of blue in that shirt.

This is the last year I think. Betway expired so we just signed for one season with Boylesports IIRC

Shame the club didn't do something decent like offer a charity to have their logo on the shirt for a year.

Tomshardware

 

Shame the club didn't do something decent like offer a charity to have their logo on the shirt for a year.

Everybody point at Toms and laugh!

Charity? THEM?!? Dream on

El Scorchio" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 10:21

Mex Martillo" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 06:39 I thought the idea was not to be sponsored by a betting company? Isn't there a ban probably coming in?
Not a lot of blue in that shirt.

This is the last year I think. Betway expired so we just signed for one season with Boylesports IIRC

Mex Martillo" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 06:39 I thought the idea was not to be sponsored by a betting company? Isn't there a ban probably coming in?
Not a lot of blue in that shirt.