Crapaqueta
Posted: 30 Nov 2025, 16:06
Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.
Out the door 1st Jan.
Out the door 1st Jan.
West Ham Online
The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
Crapaqueta
Page 8 of 13
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Dec 2025, 17:34
*Correction - He was involved in Villa’s Rogers goal by getting caught dicking about on the ball gifting it back to them 
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Dec 2025, 17:12
Yet another game is fails to create an assist, his 60th consecutive match in a row and not involved in either goal. Carrying the waste of space these days.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Dec 2025, 17:11
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Dec 2025, 17:05
Back in the team and a winnable game gets lost. You can’t ignore performances like this when evaluating his contribution. Long thought he is a net negative.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Dec 2025, 16:58
Can’t work out who was worse, Paq or Potts.
Magassa and Fernandes were mustard.
Magassa and Fernandes were mustard.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Dec 2025, 16:40
If Newcastle offered us Harvey Barnes or Anthony Elanga in return I reckon we'd take it.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Dec 2025, 16:06
It's become a running joke with Paqueta now...He does it so often that other teams actively press and target him for that very reason.
Jack Rudoni from Coventry would be a much better replacement and he's naturally left footed to give the midfield some balance but we ain't getting anywhere near him now. Watch Palace or Brighton sign him up.
Jack Rudoni from Coventry would be a much better replacement and he's naturally left footed to give the midfield some balance but we ain't getting anywhere near him now. Watch Palace or Brighton sign him up.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Dec 2025, 15:22
Costs us yet another goal and potentially 2 points.
Can we finally be rid of this cսnt now.
Can we finally be rid of this cսnt now.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 06 Dec 2025, 11:36
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:35fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:33Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:26Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocksYou're a bit dumb aren't you. My very point is that Paqueta didn't play in a bunch of games West Ham didn't lose.
Yep and we also didn't lose or won the previous times we played the same opposition with him in the team therefore the results didn't improve..
We didn't lose against Bournemouth but we won the previous two with him playing, see how fucking ridiculous your proof is, I'm the dumb one really
We didn't lose against Bournemouth but we won the previous two with him playing, see how fucking ridiculous your proof is, I'm the dumb one really
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 06 Dec 2025, 11:35
fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:33Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:26Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks
You're a bit dumb aren't you. My very point is that Paqueta didn't play in a bunch of games West Ham didn't lose.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 06 Dec 2025, 11:33
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:26fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:20Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:15The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match.Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.
So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks
Again you've ignored me debunking your solid proof...
Again you've ignored me debunking your solid proof...
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 06 Dec 2025, 11:26
fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:20Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:15The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match.
Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 06 Dec 2025, 11:20
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:15fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:11Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 10:58Clear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.You slaughtered us for our display at Bournemouth... We also drew there last year with him in the team.. Leicester... The worst PL team in years and you think we won because he didn't play...
We did the double over man u last season with him
Yeah solid proofThe worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.
They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 06 Dec 2025, 11:15
fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:11Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 10:58wils wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:46Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.
But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:
Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West HamClear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.You slaughtered us for our display at Bournemouth... We also drew there last year with him in the team.. Leicester... The worst PL team in years and you think we won because he didn't play...
We did the double over man u last season with him
Yeah solid proof
The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 06 Dec 2025, 11:11
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 10:58wils wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:46Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.
But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:
Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West HamClear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.
You slaughtered us for our display at Bournemouth... We also drew there last year with him in the team.. Leicester... The worst PL team in years and you think we won because he didn't play...
We did the double over man u last season with him
Yeah solid proof
We did the double over man u last season with him
Yeah solid proof
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 06 Dec 2025, 10:58
wils wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:46Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.
But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:
Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
Clear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 19:40
fraser wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:29Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:22
No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension.But anyway take them away and we're possibly Wolves, so yes he isn't as good as he should be and should do better but why leave him and his contributions out when we need them?
Because I seriously question his state of mind for obvious reasons. I'm actually genuinely concerned for the bloke as he's clearly struggled and the last match he played he proved he couldn't keep it together when we can ill afford for it to happen. We lose that game scoring nothing he doesn't play the next difficult game away and we score and draw without him. I genuinely think both he and us would benefit if he was available on the bench. It would also send the right message to others that you have to earn your place back especially after how he badly reacted. It feels a bit soon to chuck him straight back in to the fold but hopefully it works out and we can beat Brighton. He's going to be back under intense pressure, let's hope he manages to cope alright.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 19:29
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:22fraser wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:15Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:07Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended.Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we...
Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban..
No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension.
But anyway take them away and we're possibly Wolves, so yes he isn't as good as he should be and should do better but why leave him and his contributions out when we need them?
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 19:22
fraser wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:15Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:07Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended.Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we...
Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban..
No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 19:15
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 19:07fraser wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:38Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:32
So out of the 18 goals we've scored so far this season, how many was his involved in passing moves resulting in goals? I can only think of 2, 1 against Burnley and another against Newcastle. Beyond that I'm struggling to think of amy others regardless of him having the last touch to assist goals.I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest...Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended.
Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we...
Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban..
Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban..
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 19:12
wils wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:46Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.
But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:
Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
I didn't say he was our best player this year, I said he contributes more than most but they don't get the stick he does. He gets the blame for everything but is one of our best performers and why he's straight back in the team... But what I do find bollocks is those claiming we're better without him and even bigger bollocks those saying he isn't a team player when he doesn't stop grafting.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 19:10
Probably if we didn’t spend most of every game with less possession then our opponents and not defending on our 18 yard line then he would have a lot better stats.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 19:07
fraser wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:38Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:32
So out of the 18 goals we've scored so far this season, how many was his involved in passing moves resulting in goals? I can only think of 2, 1 against Burnley and another against Newcastle. Beyond that I'm struggling to think of amy others regardless of him having the last touch to assist goals.I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest...
Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 18:46
Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.
But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:
Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:
Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 18:32Gank wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 17:52Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Dec 2025, 15:58The post said we absolutely missed him and gave clear evidence of not only that game but also his previous 58 games in a row where he doesn't contribute to a single assist, yet he is supposed to be our main creative attacking midfielder. And the fact we instantly got a very positive result and performance without him.
He hasn't contributed to any assists? He's contributed to almost ALL our assists! Close to every single one. If you only count his contributions if he's the very last player to touch the ball
So out of the 18 goals we've scored so far this season, how many was his involved in passing moves resulting in goals? I can only think of 2, 1 against Burnley and another against Newcastle. Beyond that I'm struggling to think of amy others regardless of him having the last touch to assist goals.
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest...