AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Potter Out
-
- Posts: 808
- Been liked: 193 times
Potter Out
Had enough of this arogrant no mark now.
11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.
Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.
11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.
Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.
- Keep dreaming
- Posts: 1413
- Location: here and there, mostly here
- Old WHO Number: 225644
- Has liked: 482 times
- Been liked: 236 times
Re: Potter Out
Maverick, who should be our next manager, and the one to take our brilliant team to the top level they apparently deep down posesess?
-
- Posts: 551
- Has liked: 89 times
- Been liked: 173 times
Re: Potter Out
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 20:39Chedylan 3" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 19:35 is this hungover looking cսnt still here?
fuck him off alreadyWho, Maverick180180?
Brilliant
you should try stand up
you clearly have the same wit as Rosie Jones
Probably the same looks and sex life as well
you should try stand up
you clearly have the same wit as Rosie Jones
Probably the same looks and sex life as well
-
- Posts: 242
- Old WHO Number: 319145
- Has liked: 202 times
- Been liked: 115 times
Re: Potter Out
Chedylan 3" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 19:35 is this hungover looking cսnt still here?
fuck him off already
Who, Maverick180180?
-
- Posts: 8
- Been liked: 5 times
-
- Posts: 551
- Has liked: 89 times
- Been liked: 173 times
Re: Potter Out
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 18:36Maverick180180 wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:48Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.I think you’re a spastic for supporting a manager that organises a team worse than a bloke that had fights with his playersAll you do is complain about the manager(s). Going back through your posts is quite funny. It's so relentless, you could be a bot.
Yeah it’s funny that
you can actually trace back every complaint I’ve made to coincide with a manager performing badly
it’s almost like I care about the team and don’t bum lick a manager for getting paid a fortune to have no idea how to entertain
you can actually trace back every complaint I’ve made to coincide with a manager performing badly
it’s almost like I care about the team and don’t bum lick a manager for getting paid a fortune to have no idea how to entertain
-
- Posts: 242
- Old WHO Number: 319145
- Has liked: 202 times
- Been liked: 115 times
Re: Potter Out
Maverick180180 wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:48Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.I think you’re a spastic for supporting a manager that organises a team worse than a bloke that had fights with his players
All you do is complain about the manager(s). Going back through your posts is quite funny. It's so relentless, you could be a bot.
-
- Posts: 551
- Has liked: 89 times
- Been liked: 173 times
Re: Potter Out
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 16:19 "when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject."
still a considerably better goals per game record than potter achieved at brighton or here, you thick fucking idiot
Takashit Mike - spot on
is this bloke for real, he has the nerve to call West Ham fans fake whilst taking pleasure in seeing us lose and go into free fall
is this bloke for real, he has the nerve to call West Ham fans fake whilst taking pleasure in seeing us lose and go into free fall
-
- Posts: 551
- Has liked: 89 times
- Been liked: 173 times
Re: Potter Out
twoleftfeet wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 16:14Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
The same ones that would have screamed for Lyall to be sacked after the 77/78 season when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject.
Great comparison
Comparing a manager scoring 1.23 goals a game to one scoring our all time low of 0.9
spurs fan
Comparing a manager scoring 1.23 goals a game to one scoring our all time low of 0.9
Re: Potter Out
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
If she had the most expensive ingredients that money can buy, and got paid a fortune to cook, then served up the same boring shit eleven days on the spin, I would deffo have the hump with her!!
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3224
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 723 times
- Been liked: 1085 times
Re: Potter Out
"when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject."
still a considerably better goals per game record than potter achieved at brighton or here, you thick fucking idiot
still a considerably better goals per game record than potter achieved at brighton or here, you thick fucking idiot
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3224
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 723 times
- Been liked: 1085 times
Re: Potter Out
twoleftfeet wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 16:14Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
The same ones that would have screamed for Lyall to be sacked after the 77/78 season when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject.
you have form for slagging off Lyall, even putting Moyes ahead of him a while ago. just shut the fuck up
-
- Posts: 2163
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 79 times
- Been liked: 430 times
Re: Potter Out
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
The same ones that would have screamed for Lyall to be sacked after the 77/78 season when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 137 times
- Been liked: 438 times
Re: Potter Out
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
Nobody's having a go at you for being happy still.
-
- Posts: 551
- Has liked: 89 times
- Been liked: 173 times
Re: Potter Out
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
I think you’re a spastic for supporting a manager that organises a team worse than a bloke that had fights with his players
-
- Posts: 242
- Old WHO Number: 319145
- Has liked: 202 times
- Been liked: 115 times
Re: Potter Out
Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
-
- Posts: 551
- Has liked: 89 times
- Been liked: 173 times
Re: Potter Out
I’m backing this
you cannot back a manager that’s scoring less goals in the clubs history, whilst picking up less points than a manager who was involved in punch ups with his players, whilst sliding 3 places down the league since he took over and making the worst loan signing up front since Zaza
This is a worse brand of football than Allardyce ever served up, at least his hoofball meant we kicked the ball towards the oppositions goal
this horse faced bloke is an insult to anyone that’s ever earned a coaching badge
the combination of Sullivan and Potter will relegate this club
you cannot back a manager that’s scoring less goals in the clubs history, whilst picking up less points than a manager who was involved in punch ups with his players, whilst sliding 3 places down the league since he took over and making the worst loan signing up front since Zaza
This is a worse brand of football than Allardyce ever served up, at least his hoofball meant we kicked the ball towards the oppositions goal
this horse faced bloke is an insult to anyone that’s ever earned a coaching badge
the combination of Sullivan and Potter will relegate this club
-
- Posts: 808
- Been liked: 193 times
Re: Potter Out
Sir Alf" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 15:13 Yeah that early Pep thing particularly except they could play thru or around the opposition midfield, But the approach is consistent, keep possession regardless of it how many passes it takes to get forward. We cannot do it ( those central midfield athleticism issues one reason ) so end up after 10 - 15 passes, launching it long.
Except it's not Pep's brand the tedious cսnt has himself admitted his admiration of Roberto Martinez' possession based style.
We're totally fucked.
We're totally fucked.
Re: Potter Out
Yeah that early Pep thing particularly except they could play thru or around the opposition midfield, But the approach is consistent, keep possession regardless of it how many passes it takes to get forward. We cannot do it ( those central midfield athleticism issues one reason ) so end up after 10 - 15 passes, launching it long.
-
- Posts: 551
- Has liked: 89 times
- Been liked: 173 times
Re: Potter Out
Sir Alf" wrote: ↑02 Apr 2025, 14:46 Potter trying to play Pep's possession style with inferior players is always going to be a problem. But also Pep's style has arguably passed its sell by date? A fast transition, athletes and more direct with less passes used to get the ball back to front. Forest, Bournemouth good examples but also Palace, Fulham. Far less tiki taka.
I will wait until next season and a summer's window and at least a couple of months into next season before giving a yes/no verdict but at this stage its looking more negative than positive in terms of hopes.
Not sure how you’re seeing any comparison to us and Man City unless it’s from the 2001 season
Re: Potter Out
I’m definitely Potter in then if that no mark fat cսnt is Potter out.
it’s shit at the moment, but Potter has to have a summer window. What’s the point in trusting the midget perv to bring in anyone better? We’ll all be here moaning this time next season if someone else is thrown in the dugout come August.
The problem for the last 16 years is the same people who ‘saved us’. Everything wrong with the club you can pin to the perv, the corpse and the slag.
it’s shit at the moment, but Potter has to have a summer window. What’s the point in trusting the midget perv to bring in anyone better? We’ll all be here moaning this time next season if someone else is thrown in the dugout come August.
The problem for the last 16 years is the same people who ‘saved us’. Everything wrong with the club you can pin to the perv, the corpse and the slag.
Re: Potter Out
Potter trying to play Pep's possession style with inferior players is always going to be a problem. But also Pep's style has arguably passed its sell by date? A fast transition, athletes and more direct with less passes used to get the ball back to front. Forest, Bournemouth good examples but also Palace, Fulham. Far less tiki taka.
I will wait until next season and a summer's window and at least a couple of months into next season before giving a yes/no verdict but at this stage its looking more negative than positive in terms of hopes.
I will wait until next season and a summer's window and at least a couple of months into next season before giving a yes/no verdict but at this stage its looking more negative than positive in terms of hopes.
- RootsRadical
- Posts: 902
- Old WHO Number: 321614
- Has liked: 39 times
- Been liked: 158 times
Re: Potter Out
I said at the time he was sacked that Loppy should have been given until the end of the season to see how it looked then.
They were mostly his players and he is known for being a slow starter at clubs before improving.
I don't think we would be any worse off than we are now and would have expected to see some improvement as he has a decent record.
If it didn't improve by May then that was the time to appoint a new manager when he can shift out players and bring ones in he wants with a full pre season.
I also said at the time Potter was appointed after his first interview that he still looked shell shocked by what happened at Chelsea.
As for sacking him now, I don't agree.
We are not Watford or Chelsea changing managers 2 or 3 times a season which invariably is a downward spiral.
He needs the summer to get the squad built more in his image and work with them, if no improvement by Xmas and we are still hovering around the bottom then it can be looked at then.
I recall Brady declaring that he could be our manager for the next 10 years before he'd even taken his first game which sums the club up in a nut shell.
They were mostly his players and he is known for being a slow starter at clubs before improving.
I don't think we would be any worse off than we are now and would have expected to see some improvement as he has a decent record.
If it didn't improve by May then that was the time to appoint a new manager when he can shift out players and bring ones in he wants with a full pre season.
I also said at the time Potter was appointed after his first interview that he still looked shell shocked by what happened at Chelsea.
As for sacking him now, I don't agree.
We are not Watford or Chelsea changing managers 2 or 3 times a season which invariably is a downward spiral.
He needs the summer to get the squad built more in his image and work with them, if no improvement by Xmas and we are still hovering around the bottom then it can be looked at then.
I recall Brady declaring that he could be our manager for the next 10 years before he'd even taken his first game which sums the club up in a nut shell.