Page 76 of 77

Potter Out

Posted: 01 Apr 2025, 22:17
by THUNDERCLINT
Had enough of this arogrant no mark now.  

11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.

Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 21:20
by Keep dreaming
Maverick, who should be our next manager, and the one to take our brilliant team to the top level they apparently deep down posesess?

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 20:56
by Maverick180180
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 20:39
Chedylan 3" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 19:35 is this hungover looking cսnt still here?

fuck him off already
 
Who, Maverick180180?
Brilliant 

you should try stand up

you clearly have the same wit as Rosie Jones 
Probably the same looks and sex life as well

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 20:39
by Dick Shaftsbury
Chedylan 3" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 19:35 is this hungover looking cսnt still here?

fuck him off already
 
Who, Maverick180180?

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 19:35
by Chedylan 3
is this hungover looking cսnt still here?

fuck him off already

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 19:13
by Sir Alf
This thread will be on fire at the weekend as Im afraid Bournemouth will press us as Palace, Brentford and Newcastle did so well. 

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 19:04
by mallard
“Everything wrong with the club you can pin to the perv, the corpse and the slag.”


😂😂😂😂😂


PCS OUT!

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 18:48
by Maverick180180
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 18:36
Maverick180180 wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:48
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
I think you’re a spastic for supporting a manager that organises a team worse than a bloke that had fights with his players 
All you do is complain about the manager(s). Going back through your posts is quite funny. It's so relentless, you could be a bot.
Yeah it’s funny that 
you can actually trace back every complaint I’ve made to coincide with a manager performing badly 
it’s almost like I care about the team and don’t bum lick a manager for getting paid a fortune to have no idea how to entertain 

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 18:36
by Dick Shaftsbury
Maverick180180 wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:48
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
I think you’re a spastic for supporting a manager that organises a team worse than a bloke that had fights with his players 
All you do is complain about the manager(s). Going back through your posts is quite funny. It's so relentless, you could be a bot.

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 16:32
by Maverick180180
Takashi Miike" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 16:19 "when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject."

still a considerably better goals per game record than potter achieved at brighton or here, you thick fucking idiot
Takashit Mike - spot on 

is this bloke for real, he has the nerve to call West Ham fans fake whilst taking pleasure in seeing us lose and go into free fall 

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 16:27
by Maverick180180
twoleftfeet wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 16:14
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
 

The same ones that would have screamed for Lyall to be sacked after the 77/78 season when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject.
Great comparison 
Comparing a manager scoring 1.23 goals a game to one scoring our all time low of 0.9

🎣 🎣 🎣 spurs fan

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 16:21
by goose
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
 
 
If she had the most expensive ingredients that money can buy, and got paid a fortune to cook, then served up the same boring shit eleven days on the spin, I would deffo have the hump with her!!

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 16:19
by Takashi Miike
"when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject."

still a considerably better goals per game record than potter achieved at brighton or here, you thick fucking idiot

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 16:16
by Takashi Miike
twoleftfeet wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 16:14
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
 

The same ones that would have screamed for Lyall to be sacked after the 77/78 season when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject.
you have form for slagging off Lyall, even putting Moyes ahead of him a while ago. just shut the fuck up

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 16:14
by twoleftfeet
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
 

The same ones that would have screamed for Lyall to be sacked after the 77/78 season when we scored 52 goals in 42 games and were abject.

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 15:57
by Manuel
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
Nobody's having a go at you for being happy still. 

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 15:48
by Maverick180180
Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41 Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.
I think you’re a spastic for supporting a manager that organises a team worse than a bloke that had fights with his players 

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 15:41
by Dick Shaftsbury
Some proper spastics support us. The ones already "Potter out" are the type of men that would flip out at their missus when she gets dinner wrong.

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 15:26
by Maverick180180
I’m backing this 

you cannot back a manager that’s scoring less goals in the clubs history, whilst picking up less points than a manager who was involved in punch ups with his players, whilst sliding 3 places down the league since he took over and making the worst loan signing up front since Zaza

This is a worse brand of football than Allardyce ever served up, at least his hoofball meant we kicked the ball towards the oppositions goal 

this horse faced bloke is an insult to anyone that’s ever earned a coaching badge
the combination of Sullivan and Potter will relegate this club 

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 15:19
by THUNDERCLINT
Sir Alf" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 15:13 Yeah that early Pep thing particularly except they could play thru or around the opposition midfield, But the approach is consistent, keep possession regardless of it how many passes it takes to get forward.  We cannot do it ( those central midfield athleticism issues one reason ) so end up after 10 - 15 passes, launching it long.
Except it's not Pep's brand the tedious cսnt has himself admitted his admiration of Roberto Martinez' possession based style.

We're totally fucked.

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 15:13
by Sir Alf
Yeah that early Pep thing particularly except they could play thru or around the opposition midfield, But the approach is consistent, keep possession regardless of it how many passes it takes to get forward.  We cannot do it ( those central midfield athleticism issues one reason ) so end up after 10 - 15 passes, launching it long.

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 14:54
by Maverick180180
Sir Alf" wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 14:46 Potter trying to play Pep's possession style with inferior players is always going to be a problem.  But also Pep's style has arguably passed its sell by date? A fast transition, athletes and more direct with less passes used to get the ball back to front. Forest, Bournemouth good examples but also Palace, Fulham.  Far less tiki taka.  

I will wait until next season and a summer's window and at least a couple of months into next season before giving a yes/no verdict but at this stage its looking more negative than positive in terms of hopes.  
 
 
Not sure how you’re seeing any comparison to us and Man City unless it’s from the 2001 season 

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 14:53
by Pub Bigot
Manuel wrote: 02 Apr 2025, 14:31 Nick on C&B has officially gone Potter out :-)
 
 
I’m definitely Potter in then if that no mark fat cսnt is Potter out. 

it’s shit at the moment, but Potter has to have a summer window. What’s the point in trusting the midget perv to bring in anyone better? We’ll all be here moaning this time next season if someone else is thrown in the dugout come August. 

The problem for the last 16 years is the same people who ‘saved us’. Everything wrong with the club you can pin to the perv, the corpse and the slag. 

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 14:46
by Sir Alf
Potter trying to play Pep's possession style with inferior players is always going to be a problem.  But also Pep's style has arguably passed its sell by date? A fast transition, athletes and more direct with less passes used to get the ball back to front. Forest, Bournemouth good examples but also Palace, Fulham.  Far less tiki taka.  

I will wait until next season and a summer's window and at least a couple of months into next season before giving a yes/no verdict but at this stage its looking more negative than positive in terms of hopes.  

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 14:31
by Manuel
Nick on C&B has officially gone Potter out :-)

Re: Potter Out

Posted: 02 Apr 2025, 13:39
by RootsRadical
I said at the time he was sacked that Loppy should have been given until the end of the season to see how it looked then.
They were mostly his players and he is known for being a slow starter at clubs before improving.
I don't think we would be any worse off than we are now and would have expected to see some improvement as he has a decent record.
If it didn't improve by May then that was the time to appoint a new manager when he can shift out players and bring ones in he wants with a full pre season.
I also said at the time Potter was appointed after his first interview that he still looked shell shocked by what happened at Chelsea.
As for sacking him now, I don't agree.
We are not Watford or Chelsea changing managers 2 or 3 times a season which invariably is a downward spiral.
He needs the summer to get the squad built more in his image and work with them, if no improvement by Xmas and we are still hovering around the bottom then it can be looked at then.

I recall Brady declaring that he could be our manager for the next 10 years before he'd even taken his first game which sums the club up in a nut shell.