Page 78 of 144

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 09 Dec 2024, 09:19
by Come On You Irons
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 07:45
by Manuel
Sydney_Iron wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 07:24
Manuel wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 06:51
 
Agree to a point that it can be slightly amusing etc, but it's serious business and it's OK saying all that afar down under with a lovely little pension etc where what Trump does doesn't effect you, but it's not good for all the people that it is affecting. You clearly don't give a fuck about them, which is fair enough. Dog eat dog now days.
 
Not sure why you would assume any of that? What Trump does will affect all of us, because i have taken early retirement doesn't mean i have some kind of guaranteed pension as i don't. Im also not entitled to a government pension until i reach retirement age and I'm a good few years away from that! and it's not great, like the UK enough to survive on but little else.

The world will get over Trump, unless he really goes rogue and starts wars etc, Stock and Bond markets (that's where I'm invested for income) go up and go down, always have and always will, sometimes its dramatic and people panic and sell at distressed prices, history shows if you ride out these storms your always better off, no point trying to pick tops or bottoms, that's a mugs game and besides im not smart enough😏

We are also a looooooong way off panic mode and TBH even if we get there I'm not sure i will be doing a corporal Jones at any point...........baton down the hatches is more my style and ride it out, mind you one thing markets shocks has taught me is to always sit on enough cash to live on for at least 2 years, that should ride out most storms but no guarantees, but then dividends don't just dry up so not like that pot isn't still getting top ups along the way.
So as I correctly said you are comfortable. Some don't have enough for 2 weeks let alone 2 years plus. Little wonder you find it all so amusing from your ivory tower. Good for you, a bit classless though.

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 07:24
by Sydney_Iron
Manuel wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 06:51
 
Agree to a point that it can be slightly amusing etc, but it's serious business and it's OK saying all that afar down under with a lovely little pension etc where what Trump does doesn't effect you, but it's not good for all the people that it is affecting. You clearly don't give a fuck about them, which is fair enough. Dog eat dog now days.
 
 
Not sure why you would assume any of that? What Trump does will affect all of us, because i have taken early retirement doesn't mean i have some kind of guaranteed pension as i don't. Im also not entitled to a government pension until i reach retirement age and I'm a good few years away from that! and it's not great, like the UK enough to survive on but little else.

The world will get over Trump, unless he really goes rogue and starts wars etc, Stock and Bond markets (that's where I'm invested for income) go up and go down, always have and always will, sometimes its dramatic and people panic and sell at distressed prices, history shows if you ride out these storms your always better off, no point trying to pick tops or bottoms, that's a mugs game and besides im not smart enough😏

We are also a looooooong way off panic mode and TBH even if we get there I'm not sure i will be doing a corporal Jones at any point...........baton down the hatches is more my style and ride it out, mind you one thing markets shocks has taught me is to always sit on enough cash to live on for at least 2 years, that should ride out most storms but no guarantees, but then dividends don't just dry up so not like that pot isn't still getting top ups along the way.

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 07:21
by goose
It’s all fun and games until you realise he’s knocked 2% off your pension pot.

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 06:51
by Manuel
Sydney_Iron wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 06:06 Say what you want about the orange man, but he has put the fun back into politics🤣

The football season is fast turning into a bore fest, so each morning i look at the news sites to see what his latest antics, tweets or rants are!😲

Love the way he just doesn't give a fuck, even though i may not agree with everything he's doing, it's certainly a change, couple of Canadian expats i know though who are normally pretty easy going, rational and mild mannered yet just the mention of his name has steam coming out their ears, they hate the cսnt with a passion.....
Agree to a point that it can be slightly amusing etc, but it's serious business and it's OK saying all that afar down under with a lovely little pension etc where what Trump does doesn't effect you, but it's not good for all the people that it is affecting. You clearly don't give a fuck about them, which is fair enough. Dog eat dog now days.

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 06:06
by Sydney_Iron
Say what you want about the orange man, but he has put the fun back into politics🤣

The football season is fast turning into a bore fest, so each morning i look at the news sites to see what his latest antics, tweets or rants are!😲

Love the way he just doesn't give a fuck, even though i may not agree with everything he's doing, it's certainly a change, couple of Canadian expats i know though who are normally pretty easy going, rational and mild mannered yet just the mention of his name has steam coming out their ears, they hate the cսnt with a passion.....

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 03:41
by Nutsin
If the Trump led peace talks fail it could be Starmer leading the charge to defend Europe from Putin.

You ready?

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 20:56
by ironsofcanada
Sydney_Iron wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 19:40

In the meantime, i would expect both sides of Politics in your neck of the woods to go all out to show how far they will go to protect Canada and resist all things the orange man throws your way, fully expect to see him on the news trolling and calling Carney the new Governor🤣
There is no such thing as a popular vote for leader in our (collective) system. 

Unfortunately, while we should be focused on why we are so dependant on the States economically, why we have a Chinese infiltration problem (that includes fentanyl), and why we generally becoming less and less free, we are instead fighting who can be most against States.

China just slapped tariffs on us but they are smart enough, I guess, not to make a big deal of it.  Or they smartly know Trump makes himself the shiney object and we are stupid enough to be completely distracted. 

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 19:40
by Sydney_Iron
ironsofcanada wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 14:08
Takashi Miike" wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 07:30 Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another
But wait 113,00 members voted for him.


(One of aspects of the American system I prefer to ours (collective ours).)
Yeah but its not like this new bloke has won the popular vote, its Trudeau and his party choosing a new leader, so was always going to be someone of this ilk, don't you have elections that need to be had before the end of the year? See what the average Canadian thinks of him then i suppose!

In the meantime, i would expect both sides of Politics in your neck of the woods to go all out to show how far they will go to protect Canada and resist all things the orange man throws your way, fully expect to see him on the news trolling and calling Carney the new Governor🤣

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 17:35
by SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Nursie,

Personally, as a proud cavalier with impeccable personal hygiene, and you will know better than me, but aren't some uncircumcised chaps occasionally a bit whiff down there?

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 16:56
by Far Cough UKunt
Nurse Ratched" wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 16:31
riosleftsock wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 13:34 I missed the replies as I don't look on here as much any more.

Male circumcision was originally carried out as an essential hygiene practice in hot countries that had poor or no sanitation systems where fresh water was anything but.  It has its medical uses in a small number of cases today but a case could be made for banning it outside of medical necessity.  It has zero effect on the male's ability to enjoy sex in later life.

Female circumcision is an extremely misogynistic, barbaric practice that has high injury rates compared to male circumcision and is intended to deprive the female of any future sexual pleasure and ensure that for her, sex is purely an act of procreation.  I have not seen a single medical case made for female circumcision, neither have I heard of it being mentioned in the Torah, Talmud, Bible or Koran. It should be banned outright and lengthy prison sentences for those who practise it or allow it to be carried out, followed by permanent deportation for those involved and all family members.
Thank you, Captain Obvious.  😉

I do not subscribe to the view that because female circumcision is worse than male circumcision, this makes male circumcision ok. It's like saying rape is ok because murder is worse.

We no longer live in deserts with no access to water to wash in. Male circumcision is no longer required. To continue to practise the butchery is disgusting. 
 
Nurse, I had it done for medical reasons, I'm now a proud roundhead.

Yes it hurt like a cսnt, I had to pull my own stitches out, I wouldn't let anyone else near it.

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 16:31
by Nurse Ratched
riosleftsock wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 13:34 I missed the replies as I don't look on here as much any more.

Male circumcision was originally carried out as an essential hygiene practice in hot countries that had poor or no sanitation systems where fresh water was anything but.  It has its medical uses in a small number of cases today but a case could be made for banning it outside of medical necessity.  It has zero effect on the male's ability to enjoy sex in later life.

Female circumcision is an extremely misogynistic, barbaric practice that has high injury rates compared to male circumcision and is intended to deprive the female of any future sexual pleasure and ensure that for her, sex is purely an act of procreation.  I have not seen a single medical case made for female circumcision, neither have I heard of it being mentioned in the Torah, Talmud, Bible or Koran. It should be banned outright and lengthy prison sentences for those who practise it or allow it to be carried out, followed by permanent deportation for those involved and all family members.
Thank you, Captain Obvious.  😉

I do not subscribe to the view that because female circumcision is worse than male circumcision, this makes male circumcision ok. It's like saying rape is ok because murder is worse.

We no longer live in deserts with no access to water to wash in. Male circumcision is no longer required. To continue to practise the butchery is disgusting. 

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 14:08
by ironsofcanada
Takashi Miike wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 07:30 Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another
But wait 113,00 members voted for him.


(One of aspects of the American system I prefer to ours (collective ours).)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 13:34
by riosleftsock
I missed the replies as I don't look on here as much any more.

Male circumcision was originally carried out as an essential hygiene practice in hot countries that had poor or no sanitation systems where fresh water was anything but.  It has its medical uses in a small number of cases today but a case could be made for banning it outside of medical necessity.  It has zero effect on the male's ability to enjoy sex in later life.

Female circumcision is an extremely misogynistic, barbaric practice that has high injury rates compared to male circumcision and is intended to deprive the female of any future sexual pleasure and ensure that for her, sex is purely an act of procreation.  I have not seen a single medical case made for female circumcision, neither have I heard of it being mentioned in the Torah, Talmud, Bible or Koran. It should be banned outright and lengthy prison sentences for those who practise it or allow it to be carried out, followed by permanent deportation for those involved and all family members.

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 09:48
by Council Scum
riosleftsock wrote: 09 Mar 2025, 21:18 Male and female circumcision are entirely different procedures carried out for entirely different reasons and with very different effects on the individuals.  
Really? Do go on...

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 09:24
by only1billybonds
If the Canadian people elect another Trudeau (ie Carney) after everything that was done to the truckers, then they'll deserve all the misery coming their way. Bit like we are with the election of Starmer.

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 09:16
by Takashi Miike
I know the people didn't elect him, the people didn't elect Sunak either and he served the same purpose

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 09:08
by Pub Bigot
Takashi Miike" wrote: 10 Mar 2025, 07:30 Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another
It’s the party that elected him, not the people. However at the next Canadian general election, if they did elect a Globalist like Carney, they deserve to be annexed. 

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 07:30
by Takashi Miike
Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 10 Mar 2025, 07:19
by stubbo-admin
Nutsin wrote: 07 Mar 2025, 21:10
mallard wrote: 07 Mar 2025, 20:43
Nutsin wrote: 07 Mar 2025, 19:42 Here you go, watch this!



This is progress!
 

Doesn’t look like that link has made much progress 
Yeah mods took it down, it was just a video of a cow getting its throat slit open and left to bleed out in the name of Halal. Pretty fucking shocking!

Amazing what the UK tolerates these days. And what it doesn’t. 

The progressives have taken us all back to the dark ages.
I don't believe the Mods (on WHO) have taken it down (although can't talk for all). That link (when I look at the code in the post and try it in a browser directly) doesn't work...suspect was taken down on Twitter/X for some reason?!

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 09 Mar 2025, 22:01
by Hammer I am
riosleftsock wrote: 09 Mar 2025, 21:18 Male and female circumcision are entirely different procedures carried out for entirely different reasons and with very different effects on the individuals.  
why is that? both i see it as mutilating an infant, odd that it the religious types that go in for this type of thing, is God's design not perfect?

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 09 Mar 2025, 21:53
by Nurse Ratched
There is no need to circumcise infant boys. It's a disgusting, abusive practice. It's mutilation. 

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 09 Mar 2025, 21:18
by riosleftsock
Male and female circumcision are entirely different procedures carried out for entirely different reasons and with very different effects on the individuals.  

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 09 Mar 2025, 18:55
by Nutsin
What is going on in Romania? Aren’t they a member of the EU? The liberals will do whatever it takes to maintain a hold of power in the EU.

unreal!

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 09 Mar 2025, 12:07
by Pub Bigot
Nurse Ratched" wrote: 09 Mar 2025, 11:03
Pub Bigot" wrote: 09 Mar 2025, 07:40 Kosher and Halal meat should be banned. Don’t like it? Move to places where it’s acceptable. 
I am generally pro-Jew, but I agree with this.

I also think the ritual/religious/cultural circumcision of male infants should be banned in this country, just as it is for females.
I’m of Ashkenazi heritage. Luckily for me my old dear told the family to hop it when they wanted me and my brother before me to get the chop. 

Nobody our side consider themselves Jewish. We’re English/British. 

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Posted: 09 Mar 2025, 11:03
by Nurse Ratched
Pub Bigot" wrote: 09 Mar 2025, 07:40 Kosher and Halal meat should be banned. Don’t like it? Move to places where it’s acceptable. 
I am generally pro-Jew, but I agree with this.

I also think the ritual/religious/cultural circumcision of male infants should be banned in this country, just as it is for females.