Russell Brand

[Pentonville]

Dispatches tonight could be about him so he has jumped in first dismissing claims and rumours and saying anything he did in past was consensual. No doubt it will be said that this is The Matrix coming after him due to his opposition to mainstream media.

[Takashi Miike]

"cowardly bald cսnt, go and do your own research. as i said, you'll lap up every order thrown at you"

[PwoperNaughtyButNot]

"In 1989, Peel told The Sunday Correspondent: ""Girls used to queue up outside. By and large not usually for shagging. Oral sex they were particularly keen on, I remember. One of my, er, regular customers, as it were, turned out to be 13, though she looked older."""

[PwoperNaughtyButNot]

I’m assuming the massive focus on the relationship with the 16 year old when he was 30 is the biggest thing they have to go on. I have to assume then that the mainstream media who are in hysterics over this relationship will agree to a blackout of the new Rolling Stones album that drops in October seeing as Bill Whyman is back playing on it? Meanwhile over on BBC sounds you can tune on to the John Peel lecture. In their words “ In honour of one of Britain's most iconic broadcasters” No worries about his

[Vexed]

"That's not how it works zozo son. This technofear is half the problem at least. No point getting up in arms about something that's not possible. Might as well get back to this whole Brand is a modern day Che Guevara thing that dimwit Miike is trying to convince us of. Even though pretty much everything Brand ever says is gibberish or recycled from many other alarmist dickheads. There's no original opinion coming out of the bloke but apparently the government are worried about his 'insifht' into, whatever is in the news this week. How did we become such a nation of cretins?"

[Mike Oxsaw]

"Takashi Miike 1:29 Thu Sep 21 When it starts to happen, nailed on, as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow, you'll get the same moronic, I'm-too-fucking-cool-to-worry-about-all-this-bollocks sheep screeching in everybody else's ear ""WHY DIDN'T YOU FUCKING WARN US, YOU SELFISH GEEKY CUNTS!!!""."

[Kaiser Zoso]

"Writing to Rumble would suggest they think they can control the internet. And if they can’t as it stands, it won’t be long until they do."

[Vexed]

"Takashi Miike 1:29 Thu Sep 21 Fucking hell, talk me through how they'd do that then grandpa caveman. Do you think that the UK gov runs the Internet ?üòÇ Nice to see you taking a break from smashing up 5G masts to stop covid, you gibbering embarrassment."

[BRANDED]

They want to shut down the allegedly sexy man on Rumble but not the 56 sex pests in Westminster. Not sure why.

[Takashi Miike]

"no, no one said 'shut down the Internet' but you still wrote it ?üòÇ the bill, as I said, has been designed to shut down any sites/channels/people that dare to question any future dystopian agendas/laws. none of this will remotely affect you as you're another obedient, order following cսnt"

[stewie griffin]

"she's not very funny...but didn't think Ryan ever said she was attacked. Thought she had just said that it was an open secret that someone was considered to be a sexual predator, and that she called him out on it; but never went public with the name because he's highly litigious and has very good lawyers. Her calling him out is, evidently, from some comedy program they did together and the bits where she did were cut from the show."

[stewie griffin]

"she's not very funny...but didn't think Ryan ever said she was attacked. Thought she had just said that it was an open secret that someone was considered to be a sexual predator, and that she called him out on it; but never went public with the name because he's highly litigious and has very good lawyers. Her calling him out is, evidently, from some comedy program they did together and the bits where she did were cut from the show."

[goose]

Has Catherine Ryan now said that Brand was her attacker? I see pics of them alongside each other on a TV show which was apparently after the attack. If someone had done that to me I wouldn't want to sit anywhere near them - no matter what i'm getting paid. Am i 'victim blaming'?? maybe but i just found it odd.

[Vexed]

Only the morons of WHO could turn a well known sex pest's outing as a sex pest into a global conspiracy while simultaneously believing that the government can 'shut down the Internet'. You absolute fucking amoebas.

[Takashi Miike]

"1Bill, Whomail"

[bruuuno]

"stewie griffin 12:36 Thu Sep 21 Re: Russell Brand I don’t like to sound like a misogynist but this is due to the feminisation of society. No sense of logic or consistency , different responses to different situations are ok ‘just because’. A but like how it’s ok for someone to behave like a complete nonce if they are handsome or famous whereas it’s sexual assault if the bloke on the street does it. Which is what led to this in the first place"

[BRANDED]

Not to upset the sensitive types on here but wasnt Covid a warning to you? STAY IN YOUR FUCKING LANE YOU PLEBS

[stewie griffin]

"way i see it, its the lack of consistency that's the issue... on the one hand, people should be a little careful about going OTT on Brand's demonetising; there were an awful lot who didn't feel quite so strongly in the Benjamin Mendy case, to name just one example. on the other, using the Benjamin Mendy case again as example, the media didn't report on it until he was formally charged. So, minimally, someone should explain why the rules are different here. The second you lack consistency, you open yourself up to deserved criticism."

[only1billybonds]

"TK/ Kaiser. The government, if they persue these tactics with Rumble, TikTok etc has effectively said they now endorse trial by media. How the fuck did we get here?"

[El Scorchio]

"It's mental that there's such concerted pressure to cancel someone who hasn't even been convicted of anything- at least yet. It's absolute overkill. You'd think he was the proven/convicted equivalent to Savile or some sort of multiple murderer given all that's going on. Clearly he's rubbed a lot of people up the wrong way (no pun intended) and acted the cսnt at times just like most young famous men who were constantly off their tits, but is this a reasonable and proportional response? Will there ever even be any sort of charge or court case? Surely his legal team will have a field day if not. I don;t expect him to have a fair trial in any way if it does go to court."

[Eerie Descent]

"Don't worry Miike, it won't affect Dean or Capitol They, as they're in America ?üëç?üèª"

[Takashi Miike]

"this bird allegedly contacting rumble about Brand isn't some random mp, she's one of the main characters behind the upcoming Online Harms Bill, that will soon give the government the right to shut down sites/channels/people that dare to question any future dystopian laws/measures. yet anyone highlighting this dark shit is far right ?üòÇ"

[BRANDED]

"Well written piece here on this Brand story https://im1776.com/2023/09/20/russell-brand/ Here’s a section: One does not have to like or trust Brand, or even believe in his innocence, to recognize why he is being attacked. We have now seen equivalent tactics repeated dozens of times over the past several years against a highly specific selection of political targets, starting with Assange. Meanwhile, we remain in the dark about Epstein and his celebrity client list. Anonymous accusations of sexual impropriety work as a powerful smear tactic for multiple reasons. People are naturally sympathetic to women, and naturally jealous of promiscuous men. Through selective presentation of details and deliberately emotional language, it is possible to present almost any relationship as abusive, exploitative, or controlling. There are no clearly agreed-upon rules anymore for what is acceptable or unacceptable in sexual interactions, so the threat of infractions hangs in the air at all times. This disturbing reality leads to strenuous efforts to distance oneself from the prospect of facing equivalent claims. “We are nothing like him,” the world insists in unison. Yet we live in a culture in which prostitution (“sex work”) is normalized and encouraged on an industrial scale. Hundreds of millions of megabytes of pornography, almost by definition filmed sexual abuse, are being downloaded across the world every night. Did you watch any lately, Anon? One of the United Kingdom’s most commercially successful companies in recent years is an online brothel, named OnlyFans, profiting handsomely from desperation and degradation: this is treated as normal, OnlyFans issues dividends. Brand is a product of this culture, whose fissures run much deeper, and which implicate us all. As with Harvey Weinstein, the main point of his scapegoating is to deflect from our own guilt: that is why it works so well. In the period during which his alleged crimes took place, Brand was a good Leftist supporter of all the usual bullshit: videos of his media appearances from this time present a highly obnoxious persona broadcasting ideological views. Back then, of course, his behavior was accepted and perhaps even encouraged: nothing is as useful from the point of view of exerting control over someone as an obvious vice. But now that Brand has matured into a deeper and more critical thinker, all of his previous behavior is being used against him. These are tactics employed against the defectors from cults, and in its own way is enlightening. Here again we can see that the structure of power which dominates contemporary society, and not even just the elites, isn’t a council of conspiratorial elders, but a mutual blackmail ring, in which everybody has something on everyone else, so that defection is suicide."

[Side of Ham]

Won’t him not making money and just putting his view out there for nothing make him more plausible?

[Kaiser Zoso]

"'However, we are also looking at his use of social media, including on Rumble etc While we recognise that Rumble is not the creator of the content published by Mr Brand, we are concerned that he may be able to profit from his content on the platform.’ Eh? Because someone has made allegations against Brand, you are ‘concerned’ he may be able to profit from putting comment on social media platforms? Isn’t there a huge amount of logic and reasoning missing from that? I mean, it goes from ‘allegations’, to the inference that he is guilty and the presumption that he should be demonetised?"

[Lily Hammer]

"Rumble is banned in France, because Macron (Micron) is an utter uber cսnt, and it won't surprise me if the UK government try to do the same thing at some point in the not too distant future. Again, whether you are left, right or centralist, you should be horrified at this kind of repugnant shit."