Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Potter Sacked!

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 888
Been liked: 218 times

Potter Potter Sacked!

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Had enough of this arogrant no mark now.  

11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.

Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 2221
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 81 times
Been liked: 451 times

Re: Potter Out

Post twoleftfeet »

His first job was to stop the flow of goals going into our net and he has done that. 

Next job inject some pace into midfield.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 917
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 388 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Eerie Decent »

Tomshardware wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 21:20 Eerie it's because apart from a couple of poor performances I've seen a much better team than we were under  Lop and also under Moyes in the last 2 seasons.    Can't imagine a performance like today under those 2 managers.  
We haven't put a good performance together under Potter, we have had some good halfs of football, usually in the second half after being diabolical in the first half. One of his wins, the 3-2 against Fulham, they played us off the park.

'We played well second half, could've got a point if it weren't for the ref'

Rinse & repeat..
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2536
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 141 times
Been liked: 378 times

Re: Potter Out

Post fraser »

Tomshardware wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 21:20 Eerie it's because apart from a couple of poor performances I've seen a much better team than we were under  Lop and also under Moyes in the last 2 seasons.    Can't imagine a performance like today under those 2 managers.  
 
 
We won away at Newcastle, it was a better performance than today, we won and didn't just have a good go and lose.. 
onsideman
Posts: 1314
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 162 times

Re: Potter Out

Post onsideman »

Tomshardware wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 21:20 Eerie it's because apart from a couple of poor performances I've seen a much better team than we were under  Lop and also under Moyes in the last 2 seasons.    Can't imagine a performance like today under those 2 managers.  
I broadly agree with this... and you could argue that we also deserved to get something at both the Champions elect and at Wolves, one of the league's form teams, and that we deserved to win at Everton, whereas many of Lopetegui's wins were very fortunate and very much against the run of play. That was his stock in trade 
User avatar
Tomshardware
Posts: 909
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 302 times
Been liked: 142 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Tomshardware »

Eerie it's because apart from a couple of poor performances I've seen a much better team than we were under  Lop and also under Moyes in the last 2 seasons.    Can't imagine a performance like today under those 2 managers.  
Eerie Decent
Posts: 917
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 388 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Eerie Decent »

We all know Sullivan is the problem, that does not excuse the shocking job Potter has done so far.

We absolutely have to beat Southampton, I can't read another load more 'we looked good in the second half but the ref was shit' posts. No fucking excuses, they are diabolical, worse than us, which is some feat.
Pshyco scored all 4
Posts: 256
Has liked: 324 times
Been liked: 96 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Pshyco scored all 4 »

If supporters want miraculous improvement at the club. Then  Surely the guns need to be pointed at the potless gnome instead of the managers . Who appointed lopetegui and  who has failed in every single January transfer window since 2010 . DWARF OUT.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 917
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 388 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Eerie Decent »

Tomshardware wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 18:21 Decent performance at Anfield, bit unlucky to not get a point. Played some good stuff.  Potter deserves time in my opinion.  
You've said that after every fucking game.

We were 13th I think when he took over, we're now 17th, behind fucking WOLVES, who looked like having a relegation scrap before the new manager took them over.

Since our manager took over, in any other season, he would have dragged us into a relegation battle with his absolutely diabolical points return.

Every other team are allowed to improve, but not us. We're not allowed to improve since he came in, because 'they are not his players'.

Still, at least we continue to look good in the second half of games and still not win.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3536
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 455 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Fauxstralian »

Some people need to go and have a lie down in a darkened room with a wet flannel on their head. And come back next season after crying themselves out

Obviously he has a big summer … we probably need 3 midfielders who can move & keep the ball , another centre half & another striker
Ferguson & Rodriquez can go back , Soucek Coufal Cresswell Ings Mavropanos Antonio can move on and someone will buy Kudus.
Ideally that’s the Saudis with all that money they planned on giving Salah
nychammer
Posts: 1687
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 211 times

Re: Potter Out

Post nychammer »

So we sack potter? Then what? Get the next “yes man” mercenary in? Do fuck off. 

it’s not been the best but we haven’t had Antonio, we haven’t had Summerville and until late fulkrug. Get them back and add a few in the summer and then judge. 
User avatar
Tomshardware
Posts: 909
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 302 times
Been liked: 142 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Tomshardware »

Decent performance at Anfield, bit unlucky to not get a point. Played some good stuff.  Potter deserves time in my opinion.  
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3392
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 152 times
Been liked: 854 times

Re: Potter Out

Post El Scorchio »

Gank wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 16:57 Why does Potter deserve time and a second window for inheriting a shit, old, slow squad when Lopetegui didn't?
Well I would say that Lop got millions and millions before a ball was kicked to spend on several players that he wanted, to fit what he wanted to do- which was who fucking knows- and was still an abject failure while all Potter got was that Ferguson waster and JWP back from Forest because he couldn’t get a game there. If he’d had similar luxuries bestowed upon him I’d definitely agree. 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5187
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 444 times
Been liked: 926 times

Re: Potter Out

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 16:56
goose wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 11:09 Honestly, I’m so bored of us being shit that I’ve lost interest in it.

i really couldn’t give a fuck.
 
Typical Eyetie defeatist attitude 
Typical unfunny & boring drivel.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1329
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 305 times
Been liked: 450 times

Re: Potter Out

Post southbankbornnbred »

Manuel wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 16:56
southbankbornnbred wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 16:53 Not often I agree with you, Manuel. But I agree with you.





 
 
You mean because I've digged you out of late you come out with that, lol. You talk in riddles and it's mainly shite.
 
 
That’s more like it, Manny. Your usual level of messianic, self-congratulatory drivel. Much more like you.
nychammer
Posts: 1687
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 211 times

Re: Potter Out

Post nychammer »

Wouldn't have got that second half performance under Moyes BUT he's got to find a way to deliver that performance over 90 mins and not only once we've gone behind, a mistake he keeps repeating 
Gank
Posts: 1001
Has liked: 741 times
Been liked: 565 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Gank »

Why does Potter deserve time and a second window for inheriting a shit, old, slow squad when Lopetegui didn't?
XKhammer
Posts: 961
Has liked: 578 times
Been liked: 167 times

Re: Potter Out

Post XKhammer »

goose wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 11:09 Honestly, I’m so bored of us being shit that I’ve lost interest in it.

i really couldn’t give a fuck.
 
 
Typical Eyetie defeatist attitude 
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 137 times
Been liked: 438 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Manuel »

southbankbornnbred wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 16:53 Not often I agree with you, Manuel. But I agree with you.



 
 
 
You mean because I've digged you out of late you come out with that, lol. You talk in riddles and it's mainly shite.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 2221
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 81 times
Been liked: 451 times

Re: Potter Out

Post twoleftfeet »

I’m loving the Spurs fans spending time messaging on here when their own side got fucked big time at Wolves. Bunch of fucking spastics.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1329
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 305 times
Been liked: 450 times

Re: Potter Out

Post southbankbornnbred »

Not often I agree with you, Manuel. But I agree with you.

I wouldn’t sack this joyless no-mark. But I’d definitely light a fire under his ass this summer. He’s made us worse so far - which is quite an achievement considering his predecessor.
Ladysmith
Posts: 819
Has liked: 123 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Ladysmith »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 13 Apr 2025, 16:18 And we're 17th. 23% win ratio and dropping fast.

cսnt is the BIGGEST fraud ever.

He's got to go.
Totally agree mate 👍
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 888
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Potter Out

Post THUNDERCLINT »

And we're 17th. 23% win ratio and dropping fast.

cսnt is the BIGGEST fraud ever.

He's got to go.
Dick Shaftsbury
Posts: 258
Old WHO Number: 319145
Has liked: 230 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Potter Out

Post Dick Shaftsbury »

Well played Potter son. Miles ahead of any of our previous managers. 
User avatar
ragingbull
Posts: 516
Old WHO Number: 210831
Has liked: 203 times
Been liked: 97 times

Re: Potter Out

Post ragingbull »

Kudus has played good as you would expect for someone in the shop window.
LeroysBoots
Posts: 447
Old WHO Number: 10197
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 19 times

Re: Potter Out

Post LeroysBoots »

Still no Fullkrug, I'm hacked off with thís shite approach. 
Post Reply