Page 10 of 13

Crapaqueta

Posted: 30 Nov 2025, 16:06
by THUNDERCLINT
Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.

Out the door 1st Jan.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 14:57
by XKhammer
Massive Attack" wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 14:46 Just 3 poxy goals and 0 assists - and 1 of them a Penalty that someone else won - in 12 Premier League games from our main superstar creative player. As well as on his 2nd suspension for the season before December having picked up his 7th yellow.

Utter fucking dogshit contribution without the threat of the FA to hide behind this time, off the back of a previous horrific season - 5 goals - 2 Penalties won by someone else - and 0 assists yet again.

💩
A multi millionaire and bless poor little snowflake who can't afford his own counselling...CՍNT 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 14:46
by Massive Attack
Just 3 poxy goals and 0 assists - and 1 of them a Penalty that someone else won - in 12 Premier League games from our main superstar creative player. As well as on his 2nd suspension for the season before December having picked up his 7th yellow.

Utter fucking dogshit contribution without the threat of the FA to hide behind this time, off the back of a previous horrific season - 5 goals - 2 Penalties won by someone else - and 0 assists yet again.

And of ALL days that's how he repays the faith the Club put in him by standing by his highly suspicious betting scandal. 

💩

It's done Paqueta, son. Time to move on so we can still get some money for you.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 14:44
by Mike Oxsaw
Seems like the PFA have now stepped in to offer him support. Bit late, but welcome nevertheless.

From my viewpoint, this was clearly political bollocks all along, led by one or more people with a personal political agenda. Strange that it all appeared on the brink of him moving to Manchester City.

Maybe our sponsors didn't want to lose one of "their" star players, maybe "others" were not comfortable about what he would bring to Manchester City and were determined to ensure that it never happened.

We'll never know for sure - deals/agreements probably made during a proverbial round of golf long far away from the 19th hole.

It's fucked up his life and he needs help back, whether or not he's still with us after the January window.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 14:34
by fraser
The things he's been accused of is way over the top, deliberately disrespecting Billy, wanting to make it all about himself... Some sausage calling others two-faced if they like him they don't have the right to be upset about Billy. 

He acted like a cսnt Sunday and lost his shit, he should get some stick about it... I'm sure we've all acted irrationally and cuntishly in the heat of the moment when we shouldn't have, get the fuck over it. 

Re: CRAPAQUETA

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 12:32
by El Scorchio
wils wrote: 01 Dec 2025, 20:19
El Scorchio" wrote: 01 Dec 2025, 12:20
Ron Eff" wrote: 30 Nov 2025, 19:56 I alluded to it on the match thread. Some of the decisions against him have been beyond harsh this season. The first yellow he got today is just not a yellow for an other player. No chance. You see players literally shout fuck off at refs and get no punishment. He just threw his arm in the air in frustration. Yes he shouldn’t have kicked off after, but these pricks are without a doubt looking for a reason to book him. It feels premeditated. Call it conspiracy if you like but I’ve thought it a few times. 

He’s now put something on X to suggest that’s how he feels. 

Yes he’s a multi millionaire footballer who should get a stiffer upper lip but that was a clear head loss and continued sarcastic messaging to the FA, and I do have a little bit of empathy. This is the same outfit that desperately tried to fit him up for two years without a shred of credible evidence. Why wouldn’t you believe there might be a continued agenda after he hired a legal team to make them look like a load of clowns?
 
I do agree with this actually. He doesn't do himself favours sometimes with theatrics but is treated like absolute dogshit by the refs. Barely ever gets a free kick and is always harshly penalised. Seems he very much has a target on his back when there are far worse offenders than him all over the division. Liverpool players did worse today and walked away with nothing. When (Diouf?) was just clearly pushed over in the first half, absolutely nothing given. That was ridiculous. Other players dive worse than him week in week out and if they have the right shirt on it's always a free kick. Other players are far dirtier than him and barely ever get booked for it. Doesn't excuse his stupidity yesterday but he's been a marked man for a while.
Fair points about the refereeing yesterday. But the reason he barely every gets a free kick is because of his diving reputation preceding him. If I was a ref I would be reluctant to give him anything either, even when it was a clear cut foul.
So you'd have to say he has a point then. Yes he's a diver but he's no worse than countless others.

After the David Coote saga, I have no doubt the refs absolutely cannot be relied upon to play it down the line and it wouldn't surprise me if there's a general feeling he's guilty but got away with it and a bit of a grudge toward him which is reflected in the way he's reffed.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 12:26
by Mike Oxsaw
XKhammer wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 12:21
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 10:18
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 09:55 With regards to referees penalising him unfairly the biggest example of such discrimination was Di Canio who could be neigh on decapitated and still not be given a free kick.

This culminated in him sitting down in the centre circle begging to come off against Bradford.

As I remember rightly he had been denied two clear penalties which was waved away before sub Kitson ran in the box and fell over with nobody near him and got one.

Cue Di Canio getting up and trying to wrestle the ball away from BFF to take the pen.

High drama and entertaining but referees have their own agendas particularly when it comes to certain players and clubs.

Liverpool are allowed to get away with murder when it comes to play acting and I'm sure that is factored into the game management allowing them to break up the play dictate the pace and regroup when under pressure.

The refs by allowing this to occur are effectively facilitating cheating.
I'd be careful about calling is cheating, unless the term is applied further up the admin pyramid.

Refs are clearly under pressure to make sure that the media's (and hence the football administration's)   preferred teams end up in Europe every season.

Leicester can never, ever, be allowed to happen again.

That's what 14 PL teams are up against now, every season.

Those who take the media's shilling will never openly state such though.
You know when l said you mainly post utter bollocks?
Like as on all your conquests in SE Asia, you mean

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 12:21
by XKhammer
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 10:18
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 09:55 With regards to referees penalising him unfairly the biggest example of such discrimination was Di Canio who could be neigh on decapitated and still not be given a free kick.

This culminated in him sitting down in the centre circle begging to come off against Bradford.

As I remember rightly he had been denied two clear penalties which was waved away before sub Kitson ran in the box and fell over with nobody near him and got one.

Cue Di Canio getting up and trying to wrestle the ball away from BFF to take the pen.

High drama and entertaining but referees have their own agendas particularly when it comes to certain players and clubs.

Liverpool are allowed to get away with murder when it comes to play acting and I'm sure that is factored into the game management allowing them to break up the play dictate the pace and regroup when under pressure.

The refs by allowing this to occur are effectively facilitating cheating.
I'd be careful about calling is cheating, unless the term is applied further up the admin pyramid.

Refs are clearly under pressure to make sure that the media's (and hence the football administration's)   preferred teams end up in Europe every season.

Leicester can never, ever, be allowed to happen again.

That's what 14 PL teams are up against now, every season.

Those who take the media's shilling will never openly state such though.
You know when l said you mainly post utter bollocks?

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 10:18
by Mike Oxsaw
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 09:55 With regards to referees penalising him unfairly the biggest example of such discrimination was Di Canio who could be neigh on decapitated and still not be given a free kick.

This culminated in him sitting down in the centre circle begging to come off against Bradford.

As I remember rightly he had been denied two clear penalties which was waved away before sub Kitson ran in the box and fell over with nobody near him and got one.

Cue Di Canio getting up and trying to wrestle the ball away from BFF to take the pen.

High drama and entertaining but referees have their own agendas particularly when it comes to certain players and clubs.

Liverpool are allowed to get away with murder when it comes to play acting and I'm sure that is factored into the game management allowing them to break up the play dictate the pace and regroup when under pressure.

The refs by allowing this to occur are effectively facilitating cheating.
I'd be careful about calling is cheating, unless the term is applied further up the admin pyramid.

Refs are clearly under pressure to make sure that the media's (and hence the football administration's)   preferred teams end up in Europe every season.

Leicester can never, ever, be allowed to happen again.

That's what 14 PL teams are up against now, every season.

Those who take the media's shilling will never openly state such though.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 09:55
by Gary Strodders shank
With regards to referees penalising him unfairly the biggest example of such discrimination was Di Canio who could be neigh on decapitated and still not be given a free kick.

This culminated in him sitting down in the centre circle begging to come off against Bradford.

As I remember rightly he had been denied two clear penalties which was waved away before sub Kitson ran in the box and fell over with nobody near him and got one.

Cue Di Canio getting up and trying to wrestle the ball away from BFF to take the pen.

High drama and entertaining but referees have their own agendas particularly when it comes to certain players and clubs.

Liverpool are allowed to get away with murder when it comes to play acting and I'm sure that is factored into the game management allowing them to break up the play dictate the pace and regroup when under pressure.

The refs by allowing this to occur are effectively facilitating cheating.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 09:13
by Mike Oxsaw
Mad Ferret" wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 07:46 Would certainly be looking to offload Paqueta and Potts in Jan.
Neither plays for spurs, so yet another vacuous statement attributed to your user name.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 07:59
by twoleftfeet
Mad Ferret" wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 07:46 Would certainly be looking to offload Paqueta and Potts in Jan.
🎣🐟🎣🐟🎣🐟🎣🐟🎣🐟

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 07:58
by Far Cough UKunt
Mad Ferret" wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 07:46 Would certainly be looking to offload Paqueta and Potts in Jan.
Turn it in you fucking helmet.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 07:54
by THUNDERCLINT
nychammer wrote: 01 Dec 2025, 20:22
pdcwhu wrote: 01 Dec 2025, 15:31 I'd prefer him to stay,the refs are so amateurish he's Quality on his day.
What day is that then? 
When a blue supermoon falls on February 29th.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 07:46
by Mad Ferret
Would certainly be looking to offload Paqueta and Potts in Jan.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 07:38
by Sweep
Gank wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 02:20
Outer Cape" wrote: 01 Dec 2025, 21:41 I'll drive him to the airport .... and I live in California for fuck's sake! 
So you'd get rid of our most skilled player, when all our midfield dross is already on the bench every game? Who takes his place, Irvine? The Ward-Prowse can have Irvine's bench spot.

Yeah, that'll sort the team out. 
We take the money and sign someone else.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 05:28
by BoleynGone
Gank,
He is so overly rated.
I can't remember the last time he did anything of note for the team. No assists.
His goals aside,which are either pens or great goals.
he's not a team player anymore, that evaporated after that night in Prague.
He pick's up yellow cards more than he sends out Christmas cards.
He dived over several times one of them so ridiculous everyone where i was watching just laughed.If the ref saw this he would have noted it obviously.
It doesn't help that our manager speaks out in such away that Paqueta thinks he can do no wrong,he still doesn't think he has going by his tweets,the second one says it all, "sorry everyone but I'm the victim here"

Liverpool were fucking cheats, I was yelling it out,Slot is a cheat and I hope Sunderland dismantle them.(that will put the coward Nuno to shame )

How anyone can support him after he did this on the day Billy died is an utter cսnt themselves and is two faced if they mourn him and back Paqueta.

 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 02:20
by Gank
Outer Cape" wrote: 01 Dec 2025, 21:41 I'll drive him to the airport .... and I live in California for fuck's sake! 
So you'd get rid of our most skilled player, when all our midfield dross is already on the bench every game? Who takes his place, Irvine? The Ward-Prowse can have Irvine's bench spot.

Yeah, that'll sort the team out. 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 01 Dec 2025, 21:41
by Outer Cape
I'll drive him to the airport .... and I live in California for fuck's sake! 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 01 Dec 2025, 20:22
by nychammer
pdcwhu wrote: 01 Dec 2025, 15:31 I'd prefer him to stay,the refs are so amateurish he's Quality on his day.
What day is that then? His birthday? We need him to show up every game, he’s a luxury we can’t afford at the moment because he’s basically done very little. 

Re: CRAPAQUETA

Posted: 01 Dec 2025, 20:19
by wils
El Scorchio" wrote: 01 Dec 2025, 12:20
Ron Eff" wrote: 30 Nov 2025, 19:56 I alluded to it on the match thread. Some of the decisions against him have been beyond harsh this season. The first yellow he got today is just not a yellow for an other player. No chance. You see players literally shout fuck off at refs and get no punishment. He just threw his arm in the air in frustration. Yes he shouldn’t have kicked off after, but these pricks are without a doubt looking for a reason to book him. It feels premeditated. Call it conspiracy if you like but I’ve thought it a few times. 

He’s now put something on X to suggest that’s how he feels. 

Yes he’s a multi millionaire footballer who should get a stiffer upper lip but that was a clear head loss and continued sarcastic messaging to the FA, and I do have a little bit of empathy. This is the same outfit that desperately tried to fit him up for two years without a shred of credible evidence. Why wouldn’t you believe there might be a continued agenda after he hired a legal team to make them look like a load of clowns?
 
I do agree with this actually. He doesn't do himself favours sometimes with theatrics but is treated like absolute dogshit by the refs. Barely ever gets a free kick and is always harshly penalised. Seems he very much has a target on his back when there are far worse offenders than him all over the division. Liverpool players did worse today and walked away with nothing. When (Diouf?) was just clearly pushed over in the first half, absolutely nothing given. That was ridiculous. Other players dive worse than him week in week out and if they have the right shirt on it's always a free kick. Other players are far dirtier than him and barely ever get booked for it. Doesn't excuse his stupidity yesterday but he's been a marked man for a while.
Fair points about the refereeing yesterday. But the reason he barely every gets a free kick is because of his diving reputation preceding him. If I was a ref I would be reluctant to give him anything either, even when it was a clear cut foul.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 01 Dec 2025, 20:06
by Outer Cape
Let's replace him with that Hackney youngster now playing at Boro. How good would it be to have Hackney playing in Hackney. You know it makes sense. 

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 01 Dec 2025, 17:37
by Massive Attack
Who was the Ref anyway? Hadn't recognised the bun taking scouse shitcunt before. Hope he gets pelters the next time he's selected so he feels the heat, irrespective of Paqueta playing in to their hands.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 01 Dec 2025, 17:12
by Far Cough UKunt
I don't know why big nosed Virgil Van Dijk had to get involved?

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 01 Dec 2025, 17:05
by El Scorchio
The ref was fucking awful. The things he let go from them and things like Magassa's card and indeed Paqueta's first card were utter jokes. His second card was absolute idiocy though. What possessed him to keep going back to the ref time after time I shall never know. Maybe it's akin to Di Canio's famous outburst vs Bradford City.

Re: Crapaqueta

Posted: 01 Dec 2025, 16:41
by BRANDED
He was complaining that our player got the ball. Rightly so. Then he got carded and lost it. I recon I would have as well. In fact I would have nutted the Ref and fucked off back to Brazil.