Page 94 of 473

NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 10 Mar 2016, 09:51
by crystal falace
"Free agency started last night and was pretty crazy some huge money being spent. Osweiler getting £18m a year for the Texans, leaving the Broncos without a QB, Giants have spent a fortune on good but not great players, Oliver Vernon has more guaranteed money than JJ Watt. lots more deals but cant be bothered to list them all."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 17 Jun 2022, 02:05
by crystal falace
So far we have: Crystal falace Boston blitz Feeleys helmet Great turley rip off Ashdown vipers Milton keynes hammers Whu eagles Deportivo hammers Occupy seahawks West Ram united 10 teams confirmed. Could have space for another 4.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 16 Jun 2022, 20:12
by OccupyGreenStreet
"Damn, missed this message. I'll whomail you crystal. Team name is ""òOccupy Seahawks'."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 16 Jun 2022, 18:21
by Hermit Road
Ha. Much deepers.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 16 Jun 2022, 17:09
by crystal falace
7 team slots filled already. Ive had an 8th message but it didnt have a team name on it so unsure which 8th team i'm saving a slot for

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 13 Jun 2022, 18:03
by Norflundon
"Is that hatred from the two MASSIVE hidings you got last season""¶.or does it go deeper than that"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 13 Jun 2022, 17:49
by Hermit Road
Any chance of dropping some round my house so I can wipe my arse with it?

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 13 Jun 2022, 17:43
by Norflundon
My brother comes home Friday and I've told him to bring a suitcase full of cowboys gear including a Parson (actual) top and a lamb or Prescott one He seems quite happy with the draft and how the new players are slotting in seems quite optimistic about this season although we have a pretty tough schedule this year

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 13 Jun 2022, 17:41
by Norflundon
It was actually going to be cowboys v packets but being probably the biggest regular season TV audience they changed their mind

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 12 Jun 2022, 20:03
by crystal falace
I've rebooted the league so first cone first serve for who gets in. If you're already in please WHOmail me your team name. If you'd like to join then WHOmail me and i can save you a space. Depending on demand we could increase the number of teams in the league.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 12 Jun 2022, 19:37
by Hermit Road
Yes please Crystal. Makes the season a lot more enjoyable.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 12 Jun 2022, 19:02
by Holstebro Hammer
"Yes please Crystal. I enjoy the NFL fantasy, while I couldn't give a shit about the Football one."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 12 Jun 2022, 18:47
by crystal falace
Alright guyssorry ive barely been on here for ages. Are people keen if i reboot the fantasy league again this year?

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 04 May 2022, 18:02
by the coming of gary
.. Packers are a guaranteed sell out anyway - i hope you can go and enjoy it ! .

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 04 May 2022, 17:37
by RBshorty
Would love to see the G Men vs Packers. But there's no fucking way Lewis and Levy are getting a penny from me.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 04 May 2022, 16:48
by the coming of gary
.. this years London games are announced ; Oct 02 - Saints v Vikings - @ Spurs Oct 09 - Packers v Giants - @ Spurs Oct 30 - Jaguars v Broncos - @ Wembley .

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 02 May 2022, 20:54
by ironsofcanada
"The Honey Badger coming back to Louisiana. Pretty mean and stacked secondary for the Saints this year. Different DNA under Allen certainly, Winston just needs to convince me on the other side if the ball and Thomas needs stay healthy."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 02 May 2022, 11:36
by southbankbornnbred
"Smoke Monday is one of the best names in the NFL for a while. It's a shame the Jets didn't take him undrafted, because we could have teamed him up in the backfield with Sauce. The Jets' moves aside, that was a really deep draft this year and quite a few sides added a lot of depth to their roster. Ravens, Eagles, Chiefs, Vikings, Packers etc. Even the Cowgirls drafted quite well - and they traditionally overspend/commit on riskier signings. Early days, of course, and there may still be some big moves ahead of the season (Deebo etc). But looking at it very early, the Ravens and Chiefs are going to be very strong again next term. Two coaches who know how to build sides and they drafted that way. The Ravens got an absolute steal in Hamilton at safety. He was certainly one of the ten best players in the draft - arguably top five material - and they got him at #14 because it's rare to take a safety so high. Then they followed it up with the best centre in the draft, in my view. He's a nailed on starter for them and will help to protect Jackson. Reid's problem last season was that the Chiefs were too easy to pass against (for a team that wanted to win the whole thing) - and he went out and addressed that with two first rounders, including a solid cornerback. Then, as a Brucie Bonus, they landed a better-than-expected WR to help replace Tyreek. Hill remains a big hole to fill, but they took good steps towards that. Surely the Hawks now have to take a punt on Baker Mayfield?"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 01 May 2022, 16:10
by ironsofcanada
"Who cares about the draft, Saints sigh Smoke Monday as an UDFA."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 01 May 2022, 15:51
by Takashi Miike
*Bryce Young* Bryce Love was our running back who never played a game

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 01 May 2022, 15:48
by Takashi Miike
"OGS, you've also got a fifth rounder from Pittsburgh. Package a few together and move up for Bryce Love"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 01 May 2022, 15:45
by OccupyGreenStreet
"Jets had a great draft, AFC East could be interesting this year. Agreed, TM, reckon Hawks must be thinking of a QB from next year's class and putting the building blocks in this year. Still got Rd1 and Rd 2 picks from Broncos in 2023."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 01 May 2022, 11:21
by Takashi Miike
"SB, your GM nailed the draft. Getting Johnson that late was a masterstroke, Breece Hall is a great running back which will now allow Carter to do more of the later down stuff he did in Carolina and the only reason Ruckert went as late as he did, was because he was playing alongside the Ohio State receivers I didn't miss a NC game in 2020 when Howell had all his weapons (Carter, Wiliams, Brown, Newsome), and if he'd entered last year's draft would have been a top twenty pick. No idea why so many teams ignored him, but who gives shit now. He now has time to to develop behind Wentz and won't be rushed in to the main job"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 01 May 2022, 11:01
by southbankbornnbred
"Jets finished the lower rounds with something more like a ""traditional""ù draft for us - including a tight end we probably don't need (although he's a huge Jets fan) and a TWICE convicted felon! But, regardless, we had a very fine draft and added some serious talent to a poor roster. The Jets are still some way off being a play-off side, because most of the talent is young. We're going to be a bit like an under-21 side in the premier league. But if Saleh doesn't win at least seven games next season, he will start to become the problem. He'll be beyond the ""excuses""ù phase, after his GM delivered a talent-heavy draft for the second year. TM - Howell is a good player for a 5th rounder, isn't he? In previous years, when the league was awash with its usual QB inflation, he'd go two rounds above that. This year, the opposite happened: many of the so-called experts decided the QB class was relatively poor (which it probably is), but it meant the few guys with decent talent stayed on the board for longer. I think you got a bargain."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 30 Apr 2022, 21:53
by Takashi Miike
"OGS, I thought Howell or Willis were perfect for you but maybe Carroll's looking to next year where they'll be a few more talented QBs entering the draft"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 30 Apr 2022, 21:41
by OccupyGreenStreet
"Nice one, TM, you got your pick with Howell. Hawks have drafted pretty well - except for steering clear of a QB when we've had ready picks and little risk. Guess it's either the Drew Lock/Geno Smith show or we're back looking at Baker Mayfield?"