Page 96 of 473

NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 10 Mar 2016, 09:51
by crystal falace
"Free agency started last night and was pretty crazy some huge money being spent. Osweiler getting £18m a year for the Texans, leaving the Broncos without a QB, Giants have spent a fortune on good but not great players, Oliver Vernon has more guaranteed money than JJ Watt. lots more deals but cant be bothered to list them all."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 06:00
by crystal falace
Jets had an amazing first round

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 05:31
by ironsofcanada
Very good picks for the Saints. Just not sure they needed to move up as much as they did to for Olave.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 05:22
by crystal falace
"Yep steelers first to draft a QB, surprised they went pickett over Lewis but he is a local boy"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 05:15
by crystal falace
Cant wait for the pats to draft another bust of a cornerback in the first 2 rounds. They've genuinely had better cornerbacks from undrafted players than high draft picks the last decade

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 05:13
by Takashi Miike
"I like our pick, Dotson. He's not the biggest, but is a great route runner, very fast and the best hands out of this year's group. I'm just gutted those Baltimore cunts took Hamilton"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 04:59
by crystal falace
Titans trading AJ brown to the eagles! Absolute chaos

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 04:54
by crystal falace
Ravens have just traded hollywood brown to the cardinald for the 23rd pick. Cant believe they got a forst rounder for him

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 04:37
by Takashi Miike
"yes, five spots. I just hope we don't move back again, though I wouldn't rule it out"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 04:34
by Joe C
I know absolutely nothing about Charles Cross other than that I will be calling him Chris

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 04:27
by crystal falace
"Saints were at 16 i think? According to that trade chart they all use the saints actually got the slightly better ""value"" but if you get your giy you still want at 16 and hit on one of the other picks then yeah its a no brainer"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 04:25
by Takashi Miike
"crystal, that's an amazing trade we've done. move back two slots and get a 2nd & 3rd"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 04:24
by crystal falace
There's olave at 11! Ffs

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 04:22
by crystal falace
Both new york teams having an absolutely outstanding draft so far

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 04:05
by crystal falace
I did think the QBs would slide as none of them seem actually worthy of a high pick. Normally some team will reach for one but doesnt look like it so far. They all seem very meh. First one kff the board probably lewis to pittsburgh?

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 03:55
by Takashi Miike
"none of the QBs going is a surprise, I was convinced Willis was set for Detroit or Carolina. Also, no WRs yet though that may change with Wilson to the Giants"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 03:43
by crystal falace
I asked both paddypower and skybet for odds on olave to the commanders and they wouldnt give me any. They have odds for all the top 10 picks but wouldnt give me 11! Breece hall to the bills at 25 i also asked for with no success so i'll be very annoyed if either of them are correct

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 02:31
by Takashi Miike
"I hope we draft Kyle Hamilton, I think we'll draft Chris Olave"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Apr 2022, 01:04
by crystal falace
Jordan davis to go number 9 to the seahawks 14/1 on paddypower.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 13:16
by zebthecat
Nutsin 12:13 Thu Apr 28 As someone who had both Deebo and Elijah Mitchell in his fantasy team that is exactly it. Very much doubt he will get so many run plays in the future. He does merit getting paid for what he can do as a WR though. One look at how much others have got indicates that. He is not Tyreek Hill elite but not far off.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 10:50
by southbankbornnbred
"Word is that Deebo just wanted to get paid. He seems to have been using his versatility as a bargaining chip - trying to drive up his price - while also seeking some reassurances about not being used quite so much as an RB. Tough one, that. The 49ers won't want to lose a very fine player. But if he's trying to get effectively two salaries - WR and RB - while arguing not to be used so much as RB, then I can understand the 49ers' reticence. On his side of the argument, his workload was very high for a guy still on a rookie contract. He's basically the Martin Peters of the NFL! When it comes to it, though, I just think the 49ers should pay the guy. He's more important to them than some of them on very high salaries."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 00:14
by Nutsin
Our QB had an injured thumb and shoulder* fucking fat fingers

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 00:13
by Nutsin
"Deebo was used as a RB last year so much because we had injuries at RB and our WB had an injured thumb and shoulder. With a healthy stable of RB's and a healthy QB who can throw the ball down field with no pain Deebo will be used more as a WR""¶. That's an easy fix and an easy convo to have between Kyle and Deebo""¶""¶. Not sure that is the problem for him to sign a new contract."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 27 Apr 2022, 23:27
by OccupyGreenStreet
"That's interesting Miike, I've just been following paper and twitter articles, not seen too much footage. Gardner and increasingly Stingly have been mentioned a lot as possible first rounders for Seattle. For the QB, talk of Matt Corral and a couple of mentions of Howell if available in 2nd round, so good to see your positive rating. Unless Pete Carroll has a rush of blood and tries to trade up for Malik Willis or trades down ""¶ hard to predict."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 27 Apr 2022, 23:11
by Takashi Miike
*us taking Howell*

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 27 Apr 2022, 23:10
by Takashi Miike
"I'd have been happy with is a taking Howell, but obviously they're all in on Wants now"