The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 09 Dec 2024, 09:19
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
northbankfrank wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 16:33Cony Tottee" wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 14:34 'However those migrant low skilled workers tend to be the ones that are orderlies, nurses, nursing assistans and porters in our hospitals'
Agreed but isn't this a circular argument? The only reason we need more of the jobs listed is because we have over 10M people in this country who weren't born here, plus their dependants. Had we had a sensible immigration policy over the last 20 years then we wouldn't need to import even more low paid workers to care for the people who have arrived in that time.Simple conclusions for simple people.
People aged 65 and over account for over 40% of hospital admissions. They occupy around two-thirds of hospital inpatient beds.
2021 census shows just over 11.1 million people (18.6% of the UK population) are over 65. Of those, 10.4 million (17.4%) are white.
Hence the orderlies, nurses, nursing assistants and porters in our hospitals are primarily looking after our ageing white population, not the immigrants over the past 20 years that people on this site despise.
Cony Tottee" wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 14:34 'However those migrant low skilled workers tend to be the ones that are orderlies, nurses, nursing assistans and porters in our hospitals'
Agreed but isn't this a circular argument? The only reason we need more of the jobs listed is because we have over 10M people in this country who weren't born here, plus their dependants. Had we had a sensible immigration policy over the last 20 years then we wouldn't need to import even more low paid workers to care for the people who have arrived in that time.
WHU(Exeter) wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 14:58 Economically inactive is a bit harsh.
They seem to spend a fucking fortune in Sports Direct.
Cony Tottee" wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 14:34 'However those migrant low skilled workers tend to be the ones that are orderlies, nurses, nursing assistans and porters in our hospitals'
Agreed but isn't this a circular argument? The only reason we need more of the jobs listed is because we have over 10M people in this country who weren't born here, plus their dependants. Had we had a sensible immigration policy over the last 20 years then we wouldn't need to import even more low paid workers to care for the people who have arrived in that time.
Cony Tottee" wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 14:34 'However those migrant low skilled workers tend to be the ones that are orderlies, nurses, nursing assistans and porters in our hospitals'
Agreed but isn't this a circular argument? The only reason we need more of the jobs listed is because we have over 10M people in this country who weren't born here, plus their dependants. Had we had a sensible immigration policy over the last 20 years then we wouldn't need to import even more low paid workers to care for the people who have arrived in that time.
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 14:02goose wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 13:57BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 13:52And how does that cost differ from the Low Skilled UK nationals children's health care and education exactly?
Carry on name calling when completely missing the point.. top work!
Again its clear from people's posts that its not the cost to the UK thats the issue its that they are immigrants.How is it clear Billy? Nobody has said anything that isn’t factual about immigration and immigrants.
There are already low skilled workers in the UK, why would you choose to import more?I was referring to Surfaces angry response but if the cap fits!!
Yep I agree and those low paid low skilled workers whether migrants or UK nationals are a drain. However those migrant low skilled workers tend to be the ones that are orderlies, nurses, nursing assistans and porters in our hospitals because the UK low skilled dont want to do those jobs so we have to fill those employment gaps.
goose wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 13:57BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 13:52SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 12:22It's not their education expense that's the issue, it's the education of their children, their children's healthcare and their own healthcare, you utter moron.And how does that cost differ from the Low Skilled UK nationals children's health care and education exactly?
Carry on name calling when completely missing the point.. top work!
Again its clear from people's posts that its not the cost to the UK thats the issue its that they are immigrants.How is it clear Billy? Nobody has said anything that isn’t factual about immigration and immigrants.
There are already low skilled workers in the UK, why would you choose to import more?
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 13:52SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 12:22BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 22:13Yes and if you read through it those are not actual costs they are predictions based on low skilled workers earning half the uk average.
However, migrants earning the average UK wage actually generate a bigger surplus than people born here, mainly because they have not incurred costs for education or healthcare in childhood.It's not their education expense that's the issue, it's the education of their children, their children's healthcare and their own healthcare, you utter moron.And how does that cost differ from the Low Skilled UK nationals children's health care and education exactly?
Carry on name calling when completely missing the point.. top work!
Again its clear from people's posts that its not the cost to the UK thats the issue its that they are immigrants.
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 12:22BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 22:13goose wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 22:03Telegraph
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/0 ... nerations/
The Times
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar ... -252gxprv6
both are quite clear that the U.K. since 2020 has imported largely low skilled migrants and their dependents.Yes and if you read through it those are not actual costs they are predictions based on low skilled workers earning half the uk average.
However, migrants earning the average UK wage actually generate a bigger surplus than people born here, mainly because they have not incurred costs for education or healthcare in childhood.It's not their education expense that's the issue, it's the education of their children, their children's healthcare and their own healthcare, you utter moron.
Hammer I am" wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 12:11Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 11:53 Reckon life might work out better for you if you ignored what he says, and (if you have to) comment on what he does, Hammer I am.If what you and others have constantly said over and over is true, then Trump always delivers on what he says he will do, so where's the sense in ignoring what he says Mr Trundle?
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 22:13goose wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 22:03BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 21:56Ha ha ... Yes I thought that might wind you up!!!!
Hmmm Is that really from the OBR I googled it and found that statement in the CPS report which is in no way impartial its the Tory think tank and probably not based on any facts I also found it in a report from the Centre for Migration Control a right wing think tank whose name sums them up.
Id say it was scare mongering and Ill stick to the stuff I posted thanks! But nice try!Telegraph
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/0 ... nerations/
The Times
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar ... -252gxprv6
both are quite clear that the U.K. since 2020 has imported largely low skilled migrants and their dependents.Yes and if you read through it those are not actual costs they are predictions based on low skilled workers earning half the uk average.
However, migrants earning the average UK wage actually generate a bigger surplus than people born here, mainly because they have not incurred costs for education or healthcare in childhood.
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑26 Feb 2025, 11:53 Reckon life might work out better for you if you ignored what he says, and (if you have to) comment on what he does, Hammer I am.
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 22:43goose wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 22:21Yes and if you read through it those are not actual costs they are predictions based on low skilled workers earning half the uk average.
However, migrants earning the average UK wage actually generate a bigger surplus than people born here, mainly because they have not incurred costs for education or healthcare in childhood.Completely ignoring the fact that their dependents will incur cost of education & healthcare before the wage earners have contributed anything.
Low skilled migrants are net consumers of tax resources. That’s a fact. The numbers have grown massively, that’s also a fact.
Just the same as low skilled UK nationals then only theyll already have incurred health and education costs.
Next time you or members of your family are in hospital Id check the nurses, cleaners and orderlies to see if they were migrants and then refuse treatment on that basis. Also a large number of Drs and consultants. But you cherry pick them to suit your argument.
Good luck!