Page 2 of 3

Oppenheimer film

Posted: 28 Jul 2023, 12:49
by LAF
Saw last night. Superb film. Refreshing to watch a film without CGI for one thing. Murphy gives a stunning performance.

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 01 Aug 2023, 22:24
by BRANDED
The timeline thing works brilliantly in Oppenheimer.

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 01 Aug 2023, 16:27
by jfk
"Not seen Oppenheimer yet but thought Dunkirk’s playing on time only added to the film generally. Absolutely fed up with cgi nonsense,if you cant appreciate a film and understand the history you may as well give up.It’s impossible to recreate moments in history."

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 01 Aug 2023, 15:44
by Alfs
"I'm with you Shorty. When ever a drama starts fiddling with the timeline my heart sinks. It's very fashionable now, too. I don't mind a flashback, but it should be no longer than a quarter of a page, ie, 15secs. You're correct, IMO, that it's a sign that the writer struggled to write a linear script, so had to revert to being tricksy. OR is following the current fashion for the sake of it."

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 01 Aug 2023, 15:15
by RBshorty
"I enjoy most Nolan films. But the novelty of fucking around with the timeline, is tiresome. And doesn’t make him some kind of story telling genius. Seems like he can’t even give it up for a simple bio-pic. This one can wait until it’s on the box."

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 01 Aug 2023, 14:13
by BBondsBootlaces
Got my tickets for IMAX on Friday. Getting the wife to be ready on time is my personal Manhattan project..

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 01 Aug 2023, 13:40
by BRANDED
Saw it tonight on 70mm. Also fucking loud. Brilliant film though.

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 29 Jul 2023, 15:43
by Swiss.
Tenant was rubbish. Amazes me how Denzel Washington can have such an ugly son

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 29 Jul 2023, 15:42
by Swiss.
I like Nolan’s stance on non CGI but Dunkirk was a movie that needed it.

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 29 Jul 2023, 13:16
by Mad Dog
Dr matt. I've seen back to the future many and I mean many times. It's always great.

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 29 Jul 2023, 11:00
by Far Cough
"DukeofDevo 10:53 Sat Jul 29 Re: Oppenheimer film Yes indeed, Klaus Fuchs being the main one who helped the Soviets"

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 29 Jul 2023, 10:53
by DukeofDevo
Far Cough 4:28 Fri Jul 28 I think a few of them on the programme were. Concerned with the balance of power the Ruskies were soon provided with the wherewithal to build their own bomb post war.

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 29 Jul 2023, 10:33
by Dr Matt
"Problem is you know what happens. Imagine watching Back to the Future, but you know the ending."

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 29 Jul 2023, 06:38
by LeroysBoots
"Manuel, agreed, for me also that film was hopelessly up itself, however mate try Oppenheimer"

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 29 Jul 2023, 05:18
by Manuel
"As with Nolan's last effort Tenant, this won't be for me."

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 29 Jul 2023, 05:13
by LeroysBoots
"Just back from seeing it in Calgary I thought it was a stunning film, a great story enacted by fabulous actors and actresses Murphy sensational"

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 29 Jul 2023, 00:05
by LAF
"Russ: the explosion wasn’t CGI, to be pedantic. Regardless of that, you know the point being made."

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 28 Jul 2023, 22:27
by Northern Sold
Dunno Cough fella... on the fence with this one... looking at reviews to see what film has a King Tiger in it??

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 28 Jul 2023, 22:27
by Northern Sold
Dunno Cough fella... on the fence with this one... looking at reviews to see what film has a King Tiger in it??

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 28 Jul 2023, 22:24
by Far Cough
It's Barbie for soldo then?

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 28 Jul 2023, 22:22
by Northern Sold
Apparently its a toss up between this and the Barbie film at the flicks

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 28 Jul 2023, 21:57
by Matthew Holmes
Reckon IT'LL BOMB

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 28 Jul 2023, 21:54
by Far Cough
"Of course there's no action, these are largely scientists and scientists are methodical by nature, these aren't a bunch of AD&HD kids let loose in a sweet factory."

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 28 Jul 2023, 21:49
by wansteadman
It's very long with no action but didn't get bored with it at any stage

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 28 Jul 2023, 18:39
by nerd
"If anyone knows him on here EX ICF Kev Poloczek is head of security at Leavesden and was showing me it all , its next level."

Re: Oppenheimer film

Posted: 28 Jul 2023, 18:37
by nerd
"Green screens have been replaced by Virtual Production screens , they have them at Leavesden studio and are mental you can be anywhere and it looks so good plus dont need the green screen anymore . Its basically a huge Gamers screen now ."