Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 09:33
The convicted sex offender is in court for sentencing this morning. I would be amazed if he gets bird.
West Ham Online
The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
Huw Edwards
Page 2 of 4
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 17 Sep 2024, 16:05
In a bell curve eveyone has a bell
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 17 Sep 2024, 10:40
Russ of the BML" wrote: ↑17 Sep 2024, 10:26Problem with that argument is that rapists can't help raping, stabbers can't help stabbing and robbers can't help robbing. So do we have sympathy with these people?
As someone else said, nonces are mentally deviant. So I agree with your last statement. Put them to sleep.
You have to be careful there, Russ. Everyone sits somewhere on the ladder of deviance, with the most prudish at one end, going on to those who enjoy recreational sex, then to those with little kinky wants, onto people who you might label ‘perverts’ where I’d probably place myself, then onto those with proper outlandish fantasies, then right up the other end of the scale you have fucked up people like homosexuals and transgender people and it’s just a nudge along from there to paedophiles and necrophiliacs. If we’re talking about culling them, you’ll need to draw a line on the ladder of deviance and run the risk of executing people who aren’t a danger to others.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 17 Sep 2024, 10:38
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑17 Sep 2024, 10:33 Meanwhile a pensioner gets 20months for shouting at old bill "you're not english anymore"
Unbelievable.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 17 Sep 2024, 10:33
Meanwhile a pensioner gets 20months for shouting at old bill "you're not english anymore"
Unbelievable.
Unbelievable.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 17 Sep 2024, 10:26
As someone else said, nonces are mentally deviant. So I agree with your last statement. Put them to sleep.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 17 Sep 2024, 08:56
All nonces are mentally deviant. Its why its a fucking crime. They should be in the stocks.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 17 Sep 2024, 01:27
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 17:35 He was also paid £200k by the BBC while he had his feet up preparing for this trial.
Glad it's not a penny of my money.
Apparently the BBC are trying to get that back.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 22:23
Any justice and the sick fuck Edwards would be doing 10 years hard labour. Sick, twisted BBC wrongun cսnt.
Yep
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 22:19
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 16:29 He paid for 41 images of children, some between 7 and 9 years old, showing penetration, and didn't get put away.
Compared to 3 years someone got for a tweet.
It's so bonkers I don't think even comma could defend it.
QED
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 22:10
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 21:53
Due to the circumstances, and mitigation (admission of guilt, lack of danger to the public, MENTAL HEALTH) the judge seemingly made a decision based on the RULE OF LAW.
It would appear his hands were pretty-much tied (although this is down to the judges interpretation as to the mitigating facts).
Seems strange to me that a bloke can flash his cock at the old bill and get a 34 month sentence, yet a complete wrong-un, that enjoys viewing adults penetrating children, can still walk the streets as a free man,
As Dickens wrote, 'the law is an ass'.
Not only did the sick cսnt seemingly enjoy viewing moving images of young kids getting abused but he paid thousands of pounds to a paedo to gain access to them. Surely that aggravating factor should outweight any mitigation.
Any justice and the sick fuck Edwards would be doing 10 years hard labour. Sick, twisted BBC wrongun cսnt.
Any justice and the sick fuck Edwards would be doing 10 years hard labour. Sick, twisted BBC wrongun cսnt.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 21:53
Due to the circumstances, and mitigation (admission of guilt, lack of danger to the public, MENTAL HEALTH) the judge seemingly made a decision based on the RULE OF LAW.
It would appear his hands were pretty-much tied (although this is down to the judges interpretation as to the mitigating facts).
Seems strange to me that a bloke can flash his cock at the old bill and get a 34 month sentence, yet a complete wrong-un, that enjoys viewing adults penetrating children, can still walk the streets as a free man,
As Dickens wrote, 'the law is an ass'.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 21:33
Peculiar justification for the porridge swerve. All paedophiles have mental health issues, it is one. And aren’t all nonces vulnerable to attack in prison? Are we saying that if Huw was a professional wrestler he would get some bird as he’d be better able to hack it?
sets a precedent for anyone found guilty of a serious crime against children to basically be let off.
sets a precedent for anyone found guilty of a serious crime against children to basically be let off.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 20:32
That’s some rancid banter right there Svender.
Also a little bit xenophobic, you should probably expect a knock from the old bill now.
I would throw some xenophobia straight back but I’m not sure which nationality you identify as today.
Also a little bit xenophobic, you should probably expect a knock from the old bill now.
I would throw some xenophobia straight back but I’m not sure which nationality you identify as today.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 20:29
this is why Picjkle tell BENCH that UK is so good.
Raysists go to jail.
Pedofiles juss go home.
Raysists go to jail.
Pedofiles juss go home.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 20:19
The 50yo racist cսnt who wanted foreign people dead & advocated for it has been revealed to be a Mrs Maria-Therese GOOSE of ShutUpYouFace Avenue , Surbiton
She was identified by her prominent moustache & hairy legs
She was identified by her prominent moustache & hairy legs
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 19:49
Fuck you on about, braincell?
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 19:30
only1billybonds wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 19:11
Still, not all bad. There's a poster in Poland who'll be fucking delighted that one of his lot has had such a touch.
ag ag ag
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 19:12
In the end. Its not so much as who deserves to be in jail. Its who the tax payers are paying for.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 19:11
If a fork lift driver from a council estate had been guilty of the same crimes as Edwards there is no way he would have got off without a spell behind the door. The judge wouldn't have even mentioned his mental health, absolute disgrace of a decision.
As for Edwards, he'll probably be director general of the BBC within five years.
Still, not all bad. There's a poster in Poland who'll be fucking delighted that one of his lot has had such a touch.
As for Edwards, he'll probably be director general of the BBC within five years.
Still, not all bad. There's a poster in Poland who'll be fucking delighted that one of his lot has had such a touch.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 18:08
My personal feeling is that a custodial sentence for this 53 year old lady is both harsh and unnecessary.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 17:44
Comma I’ve posted what she said, to a local community group on FB.
Having read what she posted, you think she deserves to be in prison?
Having read what she posted, you think she deserves to be in prison?
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 17:42
Goose, are you still playing games by altering “scary words” to ”something silly”?
Your evasiveness is telling.
Your evasiveness is telling.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 17:35
He was also paid £200k by the BBC while he had his feet up preparing for this trial.
Glad it's not a penny of my money.
Glad it's not a penny of my money.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 17:34
The fantasy of not releasing known criminals into society to make way for a harmless old lady who posted something silly?
comma someone might need to explain racism to you.
comma someone might need to explain racism to you.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 17:27
one sunny day is a pedofile?