West Ham Online

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/1 ... r-offence/

Turns out he was a carpet shagger, and the cunts in charge lied about it. Labour are fucked

well, that would of course be true, if not for the fact they chose to 'sensationalise' through the media a series of lies instead. The message was not one of calm, it was one of attack. So your position kind of falls apart at the first hurdle, unfortunately.

Actually Steward, if there was any evidence of there being real links to a terror organisation and he was part of an operation, it is very much in the public interest NOT to sensationalise the detail in the media.

This is so fucking obvious I’m closing my exchange with you here - there really is no point in talking to cod-Taliban of your ilk.

"It’s not a cover up because nobody has tried to conceal any evidence about the Southport attacker?"

This can only be true if you believe they only searched his property yesterday. In truth, he was identified almost immediately, and his property will have been searched within hours of the atrocities he committed.

So - Starmer & the Police knew almost immediately of his links to Islam. He knew when he promised extra security and funding for mosques. He knew when he laid a wreath like an automaton with zero compassion in Southport. He knew when he made his frequent public addresses attacking the 'far right'. He knew when he forced through draconian prosecutions - many of which will now be unsafe - for protestors. He knew when he, and his party, blamed the riots on Farage for suggesting that we weren't being told everything. And, he knew exactly when to release it. After Saturday's protest march, but the evening before the budget, safe in the knowledge it would quickly get buried. The same sequence of events is also true of our mainstream media sources.

It is, quite honestly, scarcely believable the chain of events that have happened because of his dishonesty. Far worse than serial liar Boris Johnson ever did, and almost on a par with war criminal Blair. 

And if you have any doubt about any of the above, I shall be more than happy to put up all of your posts in the wake of the Southport murders - they're still readily available - showing exactly what you were told and believed to be true. I'll own it - i fucked up - i was critical of the protestors for attacking mosques when it was known that the perpetrator was a Christian. Even with my pathological hatred of our mainstream media, and inherent distrust of the Labour Party, I couldn't imagine that they would stoop THIS low. But they continue to surpass themselves. Being more morally bankrupt, and less fit for office, than Nigel Farage is a monumental achievement.

The saddest thing, of course, is that there was a very easy way out the second he knew. Even with his desperate need to appease certain communities, he could easily have painted the perpetrator as a victim - a sweet, innocent, BBC-employee, Christian boy who had been radicalised by someone, somewhere. The result - no riots, no disorder. By his own definition of incitement, he should justifiably be doing 30 months somewhere, starting today.

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 22:15 I think you need to fuck off this forum son.

I think you need to fuck off this forum son.

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 22:04 It’s not a cover up because nobody has tried to conceal any evidence about the Southport attacker?

Meanwhile you are just an embarrassment to anyone of the same species, Bumblebrains.

It’s not a cover up because nobody has tried to conceal any evidence about the Southport attacker?

Meanwhile you are just an embarrassment to anyone of the same species, Bumblebrains.

Moncurs Putting Iron" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 21:46 Surface,
 
I dont think that is what I did at all, but then again, your posts hold more weight with me because you have a brain and would never travel to an airport with a bunch of flowers with your view clouded with lust and vanity, based on a profile put together by hairy arsed men.

Makes you worth responding to even if you have been a little insulting.

Surface,
 
I dont think that is what I did at all, but then again, your posts hold more weight with me because you have a brain and would never travel to an airport with a bunch of flowers with your view clouded with lust and vanity, based on a profile put together by hairy arsed men.

Makes you worth responding to even if you have been a little insulting.

Well done you, Pointy.

I have just edited my post to put it in the past tense because, to be fair, he has just admitted he had his head up his arse for the past few months.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 21:28 MPI's repeated response seems to be: 'Fuck me. This looks bad for my lot, but I'll desperately deflect, split hairs and fantasise possible mitigation in the hope that something comes up or people forget about the whole thing'.

It's a bold strategy. Let's see if it works.

You really think all the people on here can’t read, Pointy son?

MPI's repeated response seems to have been: 'Fuck me. This looks bad for my lot, but I'll desperately deflect, split hairs and fantasise possible mitigation in the hope that something comes up or people forget about the whole thing'.

It was a bold strategy. Nearly worked.

Moncurs Putting Iron" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:33

Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:23

Moncurs Putting Iron" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:17

 

Ari,

A good and fair question. 

What I am saying that whilst the circumstances of the crime he committed certainly suggested it was an act of religious terrorism, but, until the investigation uncovered further evidence and further charges I decided not to jump to a concluson. It has removed all doubt in my mind, he's a dirty little terrorist cսnt who lived among us.

Regardless of my stance on the question of murderer vs Terrorist Murderer I think you can see that I could, as most could heartily and passionately agree with Brandeds post, however this nuance appears to have been lost on someone else.

That's what i said. You really trust the authorities ?

But what a diplomatic liberal response.

you = part of the problem.

It wasn't though, was it. 

If the choice is trusting the authorities or trusting you, then guess what, authorities. Everytime.

I did type more but then deleted it. You are just not worth it.

You will need the last word so I will let you have it, just know I wont be reading it.

Moncurs Putting Iron" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:33

Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:23

Moncurs Putting Iron" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:17

 

Ari,

A good and fair question. 

What I am saying that whilst the circumstances of the crime he committed certainly suggested it was an act of religious terrorism, but, until the investigation uncovered further evidence and further charges I decided not to jump to a concluson. It has removed all doubt in my mind, he's a dirty little terrorist cսnt who lived among us.

Regardless of my stance on the question of murderer vs Terrorist Murderer I think you can see that I could, as most could heartily and passionately agree with Brandeds post, however this nuance appears to have been lost on someone else.

That's what i said. You really trust the authorities ?

But what a diplomatic liberal response.

you = part of the problem.

It wasn't though, was it. 

If the choice is trusting the authorities or trusting you, then guess what, authorities. Everytime.

I did type more but then deleted it. You are just not worth it.

You will need the last word so I will let you have it, just know I wont be reading it.

I'll clear this up easily 
He's a murdering terrorist islamist scumbag,an African probably converted but he's not a carpet shagger(arab)
Hope the cսnt has piss,shit,glass and puke put in his bacon everyday

Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:23

Moncurs Putting Iron" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:17

arigurrin wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:05 You're basically saying 2+2=?

 

Ari,

A good and fair question. 

What I am saying that whilst the circumstances of the crime he committed certainly suggested it was an act of religious terrorism, but, until the investigation uncovered further evidence and further charges I decided not to jump to a concluson. It has removed all doubt in my mind, he's a dirty little terrorist cսnt who lived among us.

Regardless of my stance on the question of murderer vs Terrorist Murderer I think you can see that I could, as most could heartily and passionately agree with Brandeds post, however this nuance appears to have been lost on someone else.

That's what i said. You really trust the authorities ?

But what a diplomatic liberal response.

you = part of the problem.

Moncurs Putting Iron" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:17

arigurrin wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:05 You're basically saying 2+2=?

 

Ari,

A good and fair question. 

What I am saying that whilst the circumstances of the crime he committed certainly suggested it was an act of religious terrorism, but, until the investigation uncovered further evidence and further charges I decided not to jump to a concluson. It has removed all doubt in my mind, he's a dirty little terrorist cսnt who lived among us.

Regardless of my stance on the question of murderer vs Terrorist Murderer I think you can see that I could, as most could heartily and passionately agree with Brandeds post, however this nuance appears to have been lost on someone else.

arigurrin wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:05 You're basically saying 2+2=?

 

Dick Shaftsbury" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:10 You absolute gammon.

You absolute gammon.

that was directed at mpi

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑29 Oct 2024, 20:00 Protecting is even stronger than supporting, Bumble Bee.

Go an see a man about your lumps son.

 

You're basically saying 2+2=?