Page 2 of 5

Max Kilman

Posted: 27 Apr 2025, 08:59
by Eerie Decent
This lad is a real problem.

At £40mil, it's getting to the point of worst ever signing territory. The worst crime in football is hiding, centre back is probably the one position you can half get away with it, but not for too long. Shirks taking responsibility, who imo makes him worse than Mavropanos, at least he fronts up, which can lead to mistakes. Kilman doesn't, so it doesn't get highlighted.

We've obviously got a massive overhaul in the summer, but for me, he is the biggest problem in our team and we need to cut our losses if we can. It took a while to spot, because he hides, but you can't fool people for too long. Wolves fans told us, some wouldn't have it, but they were dead right. Absolute fraud of a player.

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 05 May 2025, 14:41
by Eerie Decent
There's  barely a fag paper between Aguerd and Kilman, both nowhere near good enough. 

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 05 May 2025, 14:28
by Far Cough UKunt
I'd rather have the cat kicker with his dodgy knees than either Mavropanos or Kilman and get Aguerd back as well.

Good God we have some fucking shit in this squad, more than I can think of any squad in the past.

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 05 May 2025, 09:52
by southbankbornnbred
He’s not the worst player in the squad - not by any means. But he’s a poor, slow player (like many in this squad) and worth nowhere near £40m.

Hes a bottom half of the Prem/Championship player. And for that money you have to expect a lot better.

He is a massive problem, though, because he’s not even a year into a massive seven-year deal. He won’t want to go anywhere else: he’s made for life at West Ham.

Lopetegui should have been sacked for that deal alone.

 

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 05 May 2025, 08:00
by Eerie Decent
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 May 2025, 03:17
nychammer wrote: 05 May 2025, 02:42 Is there a player hiding in there somewhere?  We were all lauding him as an excellent signing, we paid 40 million, what caused that thinking.

is he just a bit shell shocked at the shit show he’s joined and maybe a bit low on confidence. can he come good under the right manager ? 
My feeling is yes. His confidence is shot to bits this season and isn't doing himself justice at all. That doesn't excuse his woeful performances or indeed  his unforced error like today and called for him to be dropped myself before Brighton. I do however think he can come good should we get the right manager in to sort his head out. But he isn't currently proving he's worth £4 let alone £40M which seems to weigh heavily around his neck which he didn't have to play under that level of expectation before coming here and he's struggled with it.
He had one game in particular where he was absolutely brilliant. Any player in the Premier League can have that sort of performance as a one off.

However, you cannot be as shit as he has been, for such a long period of time, and blame it on everything else other than him.

Importantly though, if you read the thread, I've said it already, the most worrying thing about it is this is exactly the player most Wolves fans said we were getting. Slow, doesn't talk, no leadership, makes mistakes. So either they are wrong, most of us are wrong, and we can make loads of excuses for him being shit. Just like some are doing for Potter.

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 05 May 2025, 07:18
by Mike Oxsaw
Sullivan kippered again with this transfer.

He won't learn though - he's got a degree and done all the learning he needs.

Who's his next target?

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 05 May 2025, 06:49
by Lee Trundle
nychammer wrote: 05 May 2025, 02:42 Is there a player hiding in there somewhere?  We were all lauding him as an excellent signing, we paid 40 million, what caused that thinking.

is he just a bit shell shocked at the shit show he’s joined and maybe a bit low on confidence. can he come good under the right manager ? 
 
 
The same people lauding him as and excellent signing were probably the same ones who laughably thought we won the transfer window last summer. 

These are probably the same people who thinks there's a decent player in Kilman and he just needs better players around him 

They're wrong. He's just shit.

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 05 May 2025, 06:47
by onsideman
You get the slower centre backs who position themselves well, command both areas, compete for every cross, corner or free kick, block everything and generally make life really difficult for opposing centre forwards as well as being a threat in the opposition box. Most recently, for us, that would be Craig Dawson.

Then you get the quicker, footballing centre backs. The ones who can really play, with confidence and composure, and who's ability to cover ground rapidly compensates for any positioning shortfalls.

Then you get Max Kilman

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 05 May 2025, 03:17
by Massive Attack
nychammer wrote: 05 May 2025, 02:42 Is there a player hiding in there somewhere?  We were all lauding him as an excellent signing, we paid 40 million, what caused that thinking.

is he just a bit shell shocked at the shit show he’s joined and maybe a bit low on confidence. can he come good under the right manager ? 
My feeling is yes. His confidence is shot to bits this season and isn't doing himself justice at all. That doesn't excuse his woeful performances or indeed  his unforced error like today and called for him to be dropped myself before Brighton. I do however think he can come good should we get the right manager in to sort his head out. But he isn't currently proving he's worth £4 let alone £40M which seems to weigh heavily around his neck which he didn't have to play under that level of expectation before coming here and he's struggled with it.

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 05 May 2025, 02:42
by nychammer
Is there a player hiding in there somewhere?  We were all lauding him as an excellent signing, we paid 40 million, what caused that thinking.

is he just a bit shell shocked at the shit show he’s joined and maybe a bit low on confidence. can he come good under the right manager ? 

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 04 May 2025, 19:21
by Sir Alf
Casey Ive watched a few times for the yoofs, U21s and he just seems too lightweight. Maybe he can fill out and develop but seems a way off Premier Lge just now. Rice was exceptional at 18/19 years old and no one has come close to that since. A “once in a generation” talent probably.  

Potts and Earthy seem closest and then I suppose Marshall. Guilherme also in this category.  Then we start to think of the next lot which is Orford.  But even Potts and Earthy, Premier League? Hopefully but need to develop a lot more. Again, physicality the biggest issue Imo but they have time. Fingers crossed.   

 

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 04 May 2025, 18:47
by eusebiovic
Surely Kaelan Casey can't be any worse than this fella.

He might make a mistake or two but at least he is young enough to learn from them like Rice did. 

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 04 May 2025, 18:45
by Percy Dalton
We just haven't got a spine.
Starting with Areola he's a glorified shot stopper who has zilch distribution skills.
Kilman is a championship player at best and we haven't had a decent striker for two years at least.
Continue that scenario next season and it's bye bye Premier league 

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 04 May 2025, 18:20
by Sir Alf
Yet again we buy a bloke who is too slow.  At £40 million, and his wages, yet another financial and footballing disaster in a 15 year catalog of disasterous transfer dealings. Our recruitment is not even “scatter gun” as that would assume its aimed in above both feet.  No joined up thinking or plan whatsoever reflecting the intelligence and thinking of our narcissistic owner.  

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 04 May 2025, 18:13
by honky cat
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: 04 May 2025, 17:00
People didn't want Harry Maguire but this fella makes him look like a Rolls Royce even now.



 
 
 
Some of it was that he didn't want to join us, as he was on too much wedge at Man Utd and didn't fancy London. But there is far too much value placed on the opinion of these YouTubers and Twitter lot. Same with McTominay, not wanted. They were probably just what we needed this season. 

Perhaps the next manager will improve Kilman . . .or the manager after that 

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 04 May 2025, 18:10
by LeroysBoots
He's fucking rubbish, a liability every game

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 04 May 2025, 17:51
by Eerie Decent
As I said, he's our biggest problem,  because of the money paid, meaning we can't really sell him as we'd be at too much of a loss given no one would spend more than £10mil on the bloke. 

He's a guaranteed starter under Plodder,  so look forward to more of the same next season. 

London Derby, against bitter rivals, his team in awful form, and he does that 10 minutes into the game. For all the fancy new tactics, progressive carries, pivots and all that bollocks, the most important thing for a defender in those circumstances,  clear the fucking ball out of fucking danger. Absolute amateur hour.

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 04 May 2025, 17:00
by Gary Strodders shank
At fault for the goal and lost the ball trying to bring it out of defence.

Cumbersome slow of pace with no apparent footballing brain or sense of awareness when being closed down.

He doesn't show any leadership qualities either

I can't think of any worse signings in the modern era based on the fee paid and a total lack of apparent ability.

The ageing Cresswell the only talker at the back

People didn't want Harry Maguire but this fella makes him look like a Rolls Royce even now.

 

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 29 Apr 2025, 09:57
by Gank
According to this article, Max Kilman is "the best defender in the Premier League. Bar none."

https://www.hammers.news/news/david-sul ... s-stunned/

However, this is the same article that starts by saying that only three players can finish the season with their heads held high then names five.

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 29 Apr 2025, 09:20
by fraser
You have to laugh at that mong twoleftfeet who spends every game on who telling someone who has been to more games than he ever has "bye then" especially when he was demanding we sell every single player Saturday... What a sad existence he leads spending his whole life on who pretending to be the biggest West Ham fan ever. 

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 29 Apr 2025, 08:13
by Lee Trundle
Is your favourite colour BEIGE, twoleftfeet?

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 29 Apr 2025, 08:12
by twoleftfeet
WHUDeano wrote: 28 Apr 2025, 20:52 He is useless. Not Gary Breen useless, but Breen was a free and Kilman was £40m, yet they are comparable….

Imagine a club that sells Craig Dawson to someone for £3m and then signs his inferior partner for £40m. Sullivans tenure has reached bottom of barrel level. Beyond it perhaps. The constant swinging between poorly chosen foreigner to boring Brit, the wrong signings, to now the 7 year contracts to absolute shite.  I won’t mention the stadium.

Us as fans & Sullivan as an owner deserve a defensive partnership
of Mavropanos & Kilman. We deserve a poor man’s Gareth Southgate as a manger. We deserve everything we’re getting because we’ve stood back and accepted it all. I’m bored and fed up with it all and by a long way, this is the closest I’ve been to taking a step back and not bothering anymore. 
Bye then 👋

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 29 Apr 2025, 07:49
by southbankbornnbred
“Imagine a club that sells Craig Dawson to someone for £3m and then signs his inferior partner for £40m.”

Absolutely sums it up.

I’m not going rip Kilman’s character - he’s actually a decent fella and he battles hard. But he’s just a low-quality Premier League player. Worth nothing like £40m.

I also don’t blame him for signing. If somebody offered me a seven-year contract on the sort of money a £40m signing gets, then I’d bite their arm off. He knows his talent, and this one deal makes him very wealthy for life.

The people involved in that transfer should be shot (metaphorically). Lopetegui, Sullivan, Steidten (he’s not excused just because Lope chose Kilman: he still had input) and any agents involved. Fucking amateurs.

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 29 Apr 2025, 02:59
by Monsieur merde de cheval
For the outlay.. this bloke has been a massive fail.

He's in good company though

BUT HAVE NO FEAR .
BARONESS BRADY  IS IN DA HOOSE

 

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 28 Apr 2025, 20:52
by WHUDeano
He is useless. Not Gary Breen useless, but Breen was a free and Kilman was £40m, yet they are comparable….

Imagine a club that sells Craig Dawson to someone for £3m and then signs his inferior partner for £40m. Sullivans tenure has reached bottom of barrel level. Beyond it perhaps. The constant swinging between poorly chosen foreigner to boring Brit, the wrong signings, to now the 7 year contracts to absolute shite.  I won’t mention the stadium.

Us as fans & Sullivan as an owner deserve a defensive partnership
of Mavropanos & Kilman. We deserve a poor man’s Gareth Southgate as a manger. We deserve everything we’re getting because we’ve stood back and accepted it all. I’m bored and fed up with it all and by a long way, this is the closest I’ve been to taking a step back and not bothering anymore. 

Re: Max Kilman

Posted: 28 Apr 2025, 19:38
by easthammer
Lee Trundle" wrote: 28 Apr 2025, 17:24
easthammer wrote: 28 Apr 2025, 16:58  He needs a partner to complement the way he plays.


 
That was a good post until you got to this bit.  ;-)
Sorry, Lee, but I can't work out what was wrong with this bit?
At first I thought I might have misspelt complement. But I hadn't.

Mind you if I had suggested he needed a partner for a compliment.
Maybe it should be "Ooh Max what a tackle"😄