Page 2 of 4
West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 07:25
by LeroysBoots
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 22:51
by XKhammer
David Icke" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 21:34
XKhammer wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 21:12
Ohhhhh hello sailor you still on a boat...opps l mean ship lol
Well this retard has sussed you landlubbing silly bastard who thinks he's Captain Pugwash friggin in the riggin....cսnt!
Hope this helps, from Wiki (as you obvioulsy don't believe what you're told by someone that actually KNOWS. as they're fucking ON one), you fucking bumbling mong:
Patrol Boats are of varying types, including: offshore patrol vessels (OPV), patrol boat fast (PBF), patrol boat with surface-to-surface missile (PBG), patrol boat inshore (PBI), patrol boat with SAM (PBM), patrol boat riverine (PBR), patrol boat with torpedo (PBT).
Carry on making an absolute cսnt of yourself, with your square root of fuck-all understanding of an irrefutable fact/terminology. Admittedly, I think the majority of us on here know you're thick as pigshit so am reasonably sure you'll get a (miniscule, that means minor btw) amount of sympathy.
I'd suggest you fuck off and stalk a cripple to fuck. Far better use of your time, as opposed to making yourself look like the complete wankstain you obviously are.
My my you are a Jolly Roger
I know for fact from mates who have served that no one refers to their ship as a "boat" especially to the Captain
You have been sussed you swappy old salt
Do you have many semen staines?
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 21:48
by honky cat
What a load of old fanny. Far too long.
They really are clueless. All they had to mention was how much they've spent, trophy 2 years ago, thank you and sorry we're trying to improve
Those genuinely deserving of titles rarely use them "Baroness Brady" stupid old cow.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 21:34
by David Icke
XKhammer wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 21:12
Ohhhhh hello sailor you still on a boat...opps l mean ship lol
Well this retard has sussed you landlubbing silly bastard who thinks he's Captain Pugwash friggin in the riggin....cսnt!
Hope this helps, from Wiki (as you obvioulsy don't believe what you're told by someone that actually KNOWS. as they're fucking ON one), you fucking bumbling mong:
Patrol Boats are of varying types, including: offshore patrol vessels (OPV), patrol boat fast (PBF), patrol boat with surface-to-surface missile (PBG), patrol boat inshore (PBI), patrol boat with SAM (PBM), patrol boat riverine (PBR), patrol boat with torpedo (PBT).
Carry on making an absolute cսnt of yourself, with your square root of fuck-all understanding of an irrefutable fact/terminology. Admittedly, I think the majority of us on here know you're thick as pigshit so am reasonably sure you'll get a (miniscule, that means minor btw) amount of sympathy.
I'd suggest you fuck off and stalk a cripple to fuck. Far better use of your time, as opposed to making yourself look like the complete wankstain you obviously are.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 21:12
by XKhammer
David Icke" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 20:40
XKhammer wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 19:11
Seems Sullivan loves me more than ThickClit/goose/Oxbore
A deviant on here, defending and having no qualms about putting money in the pocket of another (allegedly) deviant cսnt.
Imagine my surprise that the site nonce has ZERO morals, and no idea as to the state the club he purports to 'support' is actually in.
Yeah. Sully loves you. LONG TIME.
Oh, and for the record, a patrol boat is a patrol BOAT, not a patrol SHIP.
You thick, thinks he know's it all retard.
January/February. Tick tock.
Ohhhhh hello sailor you still on a boat...opps l mean ship lol
Well this retard has sussed you landlubbing silly bastard who thinks he's Captain Pugwash friggin in the riggin....cսnt!
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 20:40
by David Icke
XKhammer wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 19:11
Seems Sullivan loves me more than ThickClit/goose/Oxbore
A deviant on here, defending and having no qualms about putting money in the pocket of another (allegedly) deviant cսnt.
Imagine my surprise that the site nonce has ZERO morals, and no idea as to the state the club he purports to 'support' is actually in.
Yeah. Sully loves you. LONG TIME.
Oh, and for the record, a patrol boat is a patrol BOAT, not a patrol SHIP.
You thick, thinks he know's it all retard.
January/February. Tick tock.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 20:12
by Keep dreaming
XKhammer wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 19:11
Keep dreaming" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 18:05
XKhammer wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 17:58
Don't you boycott every game???
Nah i'll be at Brentford game supporting the team not Sullivan
It's people like you our owners love.
Stupid fucking cunts
Seems Sullivan loves me more than ThickClit/goose/Oxbore
F M O B
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 19:12
by Mike Oxsaw
XKhammer wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 19:11
Keep dreaming" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 18:05
XKhammer wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 17:58
Don't you boycott every game???
Nah i'll be at Brentford game supporting the team not Sullivan
It's people like you our owners love.
Stupid fucking cunts
Seems Sullivan loves me more than ThickClit/goose/Oxbore
And that's something (else) for you to boast about?
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 19:11
by XKhammer
Keep dreaming" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 18:05
XKhammer wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 17:58
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 17:16
Whatever people's views on the statement, the protests should go ahead regardless - including boycotting the Brentford game (or at the very least, turning up and taking your seat late).
Nothing you've done in the past matters here, only the financial support Sullivan receives from this day on has any relevance.
Don't you boycott every game???
Nah i'll be at Brentford game supporting the team not Sullivan
It's people like you our owners love.
Stupid fucking cunts
Seems Sullivan loves me more than ThickClit/goose/Oxbore
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 18:13
by BRANDED
Sir Alf" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 17:10
Most, if not all, businesses have a strategy or long term plan. FAB or Hsmmers Utd, anyone in the medus should ask Brady for it. She can redact any densitive financials if needs be but we need to see if she has anything by way of a 5 year or more plan. As the CEO its her responsibility to ensure there is a “roadmap” ( corporate speak I know) that shows where we ate, the issues / challenges, where we want to get to and how we plan to do it. It should have supporting detail, covering financials, footballing aims, organisation structure, recruitment etc.. If we dont hae anything or its still that 10 year old 10 point plan, that fits on a beer mat, its no wonder we are in disarray. “FIRE, Ready, Aim!!” the Sullivan / Brady formula for success.
1. Stay in the premier league
2. um
3. Sell if the right price came along or indeed capital gain tax rules were scrapped.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 18:07
by Mike Oxsaw
XKhammer wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 17:58
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 17:16
Whatever people's views on the statement, the protests should go ahead regardless - including boycotting the Brentford game (or at the very least, turning up and taking your seat late).
Nothing you've done in the past matters here, only the financial support Sullivan receives from this day on has any relevance.
Don't you boycott every game???
Nah i'll be at Brentford game supporting the team not Sullivan
I do and I'm proud to do so for the sake of the future of our club.
I don't actually NEED to miss games. The reasons I chose other priorities in my life over watching football no longer exist, so I am now free to go and watch any game, any where, any time.
I don't believe that what I (or anyone else) did last week/month/year/ever since I/they was born actually matters to Sullivan as he can't use/monetise that. What matters to him is the money people keep giving him from this point on.
None of that money will come from me.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 18:05
by Keep dreaming
XKhammer wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 17:58
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 17:16
Whatever people's views on the statement, the protests should go ahead regardless - including boycotting the Brentford game (or at the very least, turning up and taking your seat late).
Nothing you've done in the past matters here, only the financial support Sullivan receives from this day on has any relevance.
Don't you boycott every game???
Nah i'll be at Brentford game supporting the team not Sullivan
It's people like you our owners love.
Stupid fucking cunts
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 18:01
by Texas Iron
A thousand words too long…
admit the stadium choice of Olympic location …
Never was and never will be a Football Stadium…never fit for purpose…
Cant see the ball properly from too many seats…
Amateur management of the football side by egotistic ownership …
…part time interfering hands on by Sullivan…
Poor selection of managers and executive …
no vision…Strategy or professional management structure…
run by an amateur majority ownership chairman on a part time basis,,,
Barrow Boy Management…
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 17:58
by XKhammer
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 17:16
Whatever people's views on the statement, the protests should go ahead regardless - including boycotting the Brentford game (or at the very least, turning up and taking your seat late).
Nothing you've done in the past matters here, only the financial support Sullivan receives from this day on has any relevance.
Don't you boycott every game???
Nah i'll be at Brentford game supporting the team not Sullivan
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 17:26
by Keep dreaming
From what I read they are pissing themselves. This should only gather more momentum to the protests
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 17:16
by Mike Oxsaw
Whatever people's views on the statement, the protests should go ahead regardless - including boycotting the Brentford game (or at the very least, turning up and taking your seat late).
Nothing you've done in the past matters here, only the financial support Sullivan receives from this day on has any relevance.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 17:10
by Sir Alf
Most, if not all, businesses have a strategy or long term plan. FAB or Hsmmers Utd, anyone in the medus should ask Brady for it. She can redact any densitive financials if needs be but we need to see if she has anything by way of a 5 year or more plan. As the CEO its her responsibility to ensure there is a “roadmap” ( corporate speak I know) that shows where we ate, the issues / challenges, where we want to get to and how we plan to do it. It should have supporting detail, covering financials, footballing aims, organisation structure, recruitment etc.. If we dont hae anything or its still that 10 year old 10 point plan, that fits on a beer mat, its no wonder we are in disarray. “FIRE, Ready, Aim!!” the Sullivan / Brady formula for success.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 16:16
by El Scorchio
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 14:13
No, what's weird and pointless is directing any and all protests at two people who've shown time and time again that they couldn't give a toss about the club's fan base, and expecting that to change anything.
Kretinsky and Gold do not have executive control but THEY are the ONLY ones who can change who actually does have executive control. Unless you're the sort of idiot who thinks that Sullivan and Brady will fall on their swords and walk quietly away if you piss and moan enough.
If Kretinsky ain't pleased then maybe it's time for him to show some minerals and do something about it. How the fuck do you think Sullivan is going "to hoist himself by his own petard" in any way that he hasn't done already?
It may be pointless, but it's certainly not weird. They are the root cause of all this and anything and everything should be done to highlight this as much as possible and put as much pressure and shame on them as possible. That's the only thing that's even been shown to elicit a response at all thus far. And they clearly do worry about it seen as Sullivan paid off the protesters last time (allegedly) and this club statement is clearly a piss poor attempt to make it all go away before there are protests this time.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 15:56
by Lee Trundle
Pav BML" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 15:51
I disagree that they don't care or just ignore bad press. They hate it! They don't like that their usual mouthpieces are also calling them out. They were desperate to stop the last march and unfortunately it all ran out of steam in the end. They are squirming now, hence the statement and trying to meet fan groups
remotely. We just have to keep the pressure on, boycott Brentford and join the protests Saturday.
Fixed it for you.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 15:51
by Pav BML
I disagree that they don't care or just ignore bad press. They hate it! They don't like that their usual mouthpieces are also calling them out. They were desperate to stop the last march and unfortunately it all ran out of steam in the end. They are squirming now, hence the statement and trying to meet fan groups. We just have to keep the pressure on, boycott Brentford and join the protests Saturday.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 14:51
by Bondholder
From what I can see, they only posted it on the West Ham website, but left it off social media.
I wonder why?
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 14:13
by Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
No, what's weird and pointless is directing any and all protests at two people who've shown time and time again that they couldn't give a toss about the club's fan base, and expecting that to change anything.
Kretinsky and Gold do not have executive control but THEY are the ONLY ones who can change who actually does have executive control. Unless you're the sort of idiot who thinks that Sullivan and Brady will fall on their swords and walk quietly away if you piss and moan enough.
If Kretinsky ain't pleased then maybe it's time for him to show some minerals and do something about it. How the fuck do you think Sullivan is going "to hoist himself by his own petard" in any way that he hasn't done already?
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 13:56
by El Scorchio
Blame the ones who don't have executive control over the ones who do? Seems a bit of a weird and pointless tactic. Sullivan and Brady would LOVE people to start getting on Kretinsky and Gold's backs so on that basis surely not.
If anything POSITIVE messaging toward the other shareholders seems the sensible way to go. I just think Kretinsky is having to wait for Sullivan to hoist himself by his own petard because he's going to be no more pleased with any of this than we are. I'm convinced the Gold family are beholden in some way to fall in line with Sullivan even post the passing of DG while they are shareholders, otherwise it would have been so easy for them to outvote Sullivan.
Notable that no-one wants to buy the Gold's shares.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 13:24
by Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
claypole wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 13:14
The more I think about it Kretinsky should be targeted more, he may not like bad press. Anything aimed at BS is like water off a ducks back they've spent most of their respective careers rolling around in the mud
I agree. Been saying for a while now that the best way to initiate change now that Sullivan is no longer a majority shareholder is to push the other shareholders to enforce changes at the top. Might not be able to do anything about share ownership but can about who actually runs the club.
I was quite pleased to see Kretinsky's name on at least one banner last week. Vanessa Gold should be targeted too as she and Kretinsky together can force Sullivan and Brady out of their roles. She wants to sell her shares so it's in her interest to have the club be in a better position as a sale prospect than it currently is.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 13:23
by Gank
I do a bit of work with AI. If you're going to use a LLM to form a written response, you need to add System Prompts to the initial prompt, otherwise it's very obviously a generated response with no creative input from the user. This is a good example of using AI incorrectly.
Re: West Ham Statement
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 13:16
by Massive Attack
No. Attacking him when he doesn't have ultimate control is unfair and takes the focus away from the real culprits. Pissing him off would just risk him walking away leaving BS regime to terrorise us without any possible solution of meaningful change.
