The Who
Posted: 06 Oct 2025, 23:56
Talk to me.
West Ham Online
The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
The Who
Page 2 of 2
Re: The Who
Posted: 08 Oct 2025, 05:44
Pete’s book must be due out soon mustn’t it you know the one he was doing the “research “for when the old bill arrested him?
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 21:06
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 20:03
This from the same live Session TM.
The Ox was just a fantastic bass player.
The Ox was just a fantastic bass player.
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 19:31
Hyde Park 1990 Quadraphenia and the same 97 Wembley Arena
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 18:58
Never remotely the same after Keith moon died . As much a pale shadow as Queen without Freddie Mercury.
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 18:08
only band to have four lead men, with the ox keeping a lid on things
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 10:04
Bungo wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025, 09:49 Fantastic in their day, but like so many bands, they should have hung it up a long time ago rather than drag it out so the band is a shadow of what it once was. This is apparent when you see a really good tribute band who are 30 years younger than the originals, and it reminds you of what that band used to be capable of.
Too much of this out there now as many bands hit their 60s, 70s and 80s. Examples include Motley Crue (yeah I know they were never any good), Kiss (yeah I know they were never any good) and I hear Rush (well the remaining two members) are going back out there next year too. Some can pull it off (Eagles), but this seems to be a minority.
Clearly they all have the right to do whatever they want, but certainly in my eyes it does harm the legacy if a band's last act is a watered down version of what went before.
Was thinking a similar thing watching Supergrass perform recently. I was thinking why am I watching this when there are so many videos on YouTube of them performing with more vitality and energy in the 90s.
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 09:55
Loved them at beginning, Anyway, Anyhow, Anywhere was the stomping track that got me into them, then they came out with that Tommy shit, that's when I fucked them off.
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 09:49
Fantastic in their day, but like so many bands, they should have hung it up a long time ago rather than drag it out so the band is a shadow of what it once was. This is apparent when you see a really good tribute band who are 30 years younger than the originals, and it reminds you of what that band used to be capable of.
Too much of this out there now as many bands hit their 60s, 70s and 80s. Examples include Motley Crue (yeah I know they were never any good), Kiss (yeah I know they were never any good) and I hear Rush (well the remaining two members) are going back out there next year too. Some can pull it off (Eagles), but this seems to be a minority.
Clearly they all have the right to do whatever they want, but certainly in my eyes it does harm the legacy if a band's last act is a watered down version of what went before.
Too much of this out there now as many bands hit their 60s, 70s and 80s. Examples include Motley Crue (yeah I know they were never any good), Kiss (yeah I know they were never any good) and I hear Rush (well the remaining two members) are going back out there next year too. Some can pull it off (Eagles), but this seems to be a minority.
Clearly they all have the right to do whatever they want, but certainly in my eyes it does harm the legacy if a band's last act is a watered down version of what went before.
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 09:47
Not my cup or tea, but there's a tribute band playing the Pelton Arms in Greenwich on the 18th...
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 09:40
Great band but same Setlist as 40 years ago
Think they are playing the last ever shows about now
.
Think they are playing the last ever shows about now
.
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 09:07
Don't mention Brexit..... 
Re: The Who
Posted: 07 Oct 2025, 00:29
Who the fuck are you ...ooh ooh ...ooh ooh