Page 2 of 2

Forest sack Ange

Posted: 18 Oct 2025, 19:53
by RootsRadical
Dyche in 'advanced talks' 😁

Luckily for us their owner is a clown.


 

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 10:25
by Fauxstralian
Sounds like Dyche might be announced today

They wanted Marco Silva who managed for fatty at Olympiacos but he has a £13m buyout
Understand Silva is out of contract in the summer so may well land his 5th Premier league job after Watford, Hull, Everton & Fulham
Is that a record?

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 10:01
by fraser
Lee Trundle" wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 09:48
fraser wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 09:43
Lee Trundle" wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 09:31
The poor Swedes.  Hopefully that's good in terms of us paying him off.
They're probably paying a lot less than we did so I'd imagine a hefty discrepancy we'd still need to pay the lucky cսnt. 
Does it work like that?  I thought if you start a new contract then you forgo everything you're due for the old one?

No idea how it works, really.
No idea to be fair but going by his past form I doubt he would have given it up 

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 09:48
by Lee Trundle
fraser wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 09:43
Lee Trundle" wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 09:31
Massive Attack" wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 08:58 Potter is also the new Swedish coach. 
The poor Swedes.  Hopefully that's good in terms of us paying him off.
They're probably paying a lot less than we did so I'd imagine a hefty discrepancy we'd still need to pay the lucky cսnt. 
Does it work like that?  I thought if you start a new contract then you forgo everything you're due for the old one?

No idea how it works, really.

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 09:43
by fraser
Lee Trundle" wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 09:31
Massive Attack" wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 08:58 Potter is also the new Swedish coach. 
The poor Swedes.  Hopefully that's good in terms of us paying him off.
They're probably paying a lot less than we did so I'd imagine a hefty discrepancy we'd still need to pay the lucky cսnt. 

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 09:41
by Lee Trundle
Council Scum" wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 09:40
Blokes probably worked a year in last 4 and earnt a fortune for failure. 
It's the best job in the world, isn't it?  You get paid more the worse you are at the job.

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 09:40
by Council Scum
Lee Trundle" wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 09:31
Massive Attack" wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 08:58 Potter is also the new Swedish coach. 
The poor Swedes.  Hopefully that's good in terms of us paying him off.
Blokes probably worked a year in last 4 and earnt a fortune for failure. 

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 09:31
by Lee Trundle
Massive Attack" wrote: 20 Oct 2025, 08:58 Potter is also the new Swedish coach. 
The poor Swedes.  Hopefully that's good in terms of us paying him off.

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 20 Oct 2025, 08:58
by Massive Attack
Dyche has agreed to take over Forest as expected. 

Potter is also the new Swedish coach. 

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 19 Oct 2025, 16:12
by Sir Alf
Change managers every 5-10 games until he gets one that strings a couple of victories together? Doednt seem to care about paying them off unlike Sully who is happy to pay 10-20 million in compo getting rid of his appointment mistakes but wont pay 5-10 million to get a manager.  Short term cost avoidance leading to a much larger, longer term cost.  Business acumen and Sullivan in the same sentence is an oxymoron with emphasis on the moron part.  🥴

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 19 Oct 2025, 15:20
by Far Cough UKunt
honky cat" wrote: 19 Oct 2025, 15:12 5 games. I reckon something proper bonkers must have happened, probably a punch up. 
I bet a few malakas and a few pousties were tossed at each other?

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 19 Oct 2025, 15:12
by honky cat
5 games. I reckon something proper bonkers must have happened, probably a punch up. 

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 19 Oct 2025, 13:26
by Gank
Roberto Mancini will be their next manager

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 19 Oct 2025, 13:06
by Massive Attack
Regardless of everything else currently, I do have a soft spot for Forest. 

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 19 Oct 2025, 13:05
by Dick Shaftsbury
Hope they get relegated. Great club, but their fans became entitled far too quickly after coming up and one good season.

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 19 Oct 2025, 10:55
by DukeofDevo
RootsRadical wrote: 18 Oct 2025, 19:53 Dyche in 'advanced talks' 😁

Luckily for us their owner is a clown.



 
They could start losing their better players like Gibbs White; they’ll drop like a stone!

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 19 Oct 2025, 10:32
by Fauxstralian
He was never going to be the right fit
With Chris Wood & their style Dyche will be much better match
Id expect them to improve if it’s the ginger 

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 19 Oct 2025, 10:24
by Massive Attack
Things that never happened.. Next they'll be claiming they're locked in talks with Don Gank about arranging a meet by the River Trent before the next Home game.

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 19 Oct 2025, 10:18
by Fauxstralian
Saw unsubstantiated social reports that the tunnel ‘discussion’ between Marinakis & Postecogolou turned into a fist fight
Think there is SUMO on at the Royal Albert Hall , maybe they could stage a rematch

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 19 Oct 2025, 09:09
by Fauxstralian
5 Premier league games including Arsenal & Chelsea
Was the wrong appointment to follow Nuno but have always said if a manager is sacked within 10 games the idiot who appointed him should also walk

Just been watching a recording of MOTD
Forest were actually ok and had 3 to 5 brilliant chances. Didnt score and paid the price

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 18 Oct 2025, 23:39
by Gary Strodders shank
That Forest owner seems desperate for instant success 

He has splashed his cash but i suspect the foundations are built on sand.

Fast forward three years and they could be in league one 

A Greek tragedy waiting to happen.
.

.
 

Re: Forest sack Ange

Posted: 18 Oct 2025, 20:43
by simons
We’re in no position to comment on 🤡🤡 owners. 

would have him over the little cսnt we have.