The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 09 Dec 2024, 09:19
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 13:12goose wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 12:56BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 12:31Seriously!? Did I say it didn’t. But you are clearly not understanding that the tax burden whether its increased or not does not necessarily equate to an increase in tax on the general public.
You seem incapable of answering the question - what tax percentage or rate that you as an individual pays has increased in the last 5 years? Because that is all I am talking about.of course the tax burden is a burden for the general public, otherwise where do you think it’s coming from?
Why 5 years? The population has grown by 7m since 2000.
in that time my tax rate has increased (2010), my council tax has gone up massively, dividends tax has been introduced, capital gains went up, the main rate of NI contribution has been higher right up until April 2024.
that’s without talking about freezing the threshold for tax rates while wages have increased.And you can confidently attribute those rises to the increase in asylum seekers can you?
goose wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 12:56BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 12:31Seriously!? Did I say it didn’t. But you are clearly not understanding that the tax burden whether its increased or not does not necessarily equate to an increase in tax on the general public.
You seem incapable of answering the question - what tax percentage or rate that you as an individual pays has increased in the last 5 years? Because that is all I am talking about.of course the tax burden is a burden for the general public, otherwise where do you think it’s coming from?
Why 5 years? The population has grown by 7m since 2000.
in that time my tax rate has increased (2010), my council tax has gone up massively, dividends tax has been introduced, capital gains went up, the main rate of NI contribution has been higher right up until April 2024.
that’s without talking about freezing the threshold for tax rates while wages have increased.
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑24 Feb 2025, 12:31Seriously!? Did I say it didn’t. But you are clearly not understanding that the tax burden whether its increased or not does not necessarily equate to an increase in tax on the general public.
You seem incapable of answering the question - what tax percentage or rate that you as an individual pays has increased in the last 5 years? Because that is all I am talking about.
ironsofcanada wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 23:07BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 22:51However it doesnt cost me more today than it did 5 years ago or 10 years ago so I dont feel any financial impact in my pay packet in fact taxes e.g. Ees NI went down reducing my tax burden so how does it affect me. Maybe Im just lucky that Im financially sound and dont need to worry about where every penny of my taxes are spent. I only think about it if my overall tax burden increases and I dont feel like it has! I mean VAT went up in 2011 way before the more recent rises in immigration so I cant see where taxes have increased at all.
Maybe you are right that Im apathetic as Im not affected. But some people get angry about immigration but I just am not. Maybe its because you are that you feel the need to point out the expense. I dont know!Maybe to de-esclate a bit, I appreciate your honesty. You came in hot calling people names in subject I care a lot about and I apparently matched that energy.
My last few points were based in fact that your NI constributions are only about 21% (high estimate) of your tax burden. You kept going on about that going down 2% but not mentioning at the other almost 80%, which at least according to the national average has gone up way more that 2% in the last year. We can do the math(s) on whether that means taxes have gone up.
Overall, the "it does afffect me" reminds of the "First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist...." Again something I feel strongly about.
Cheers and have a good night.
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 22:51However it doesnt cost me more today than it did 5 years ago or 10 years ago so I dont feel any financial impact in my pay packet in fact taxes e.g. Ees NI went down reducing my tax burden so how does it affect me. Maybe Im just lucky that Im financially sound and dont need to worry about where every penny of my taxes are spent. I only think about it if my overall tax burden increases and I dont feel like it has! I mean VAT went up in 2011 way before the more recent rises in immigration so I cant see where taxes have increased at all.
Maybe you are right that Im apathetic as Im not affected. But some people get angry about immigration but I just am not. Maybe its because you are that you feel the need to point out the expense. I dont know!
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 22:51ironsofcanada wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 22:11BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:51And you seem to be grasping at straws because you dont get how taxes work.
Go on show me where and when any of the current or previous govts have specifically increased taxes due to Asylum seeker numbers increasing.
That budget has always been there as it covers all sorts of foreign aid and yes it goes up and down depending on the need and yes it goes up to cover asylum seekers but at no point in history has any govt raised the rate of VAT or Ees NI or Excise duty specifically to cover in incease in that part of the budget so it does not directly cost me more.
The cost of asylum seekers is so negligible compared to the overall budget that any increase or decrease in that cost wont affect the taxes the individual is asked to pay.
What dont you understand!So unless you get a line item on your taxes that says "For Asylum Seekers" you are not going to believe your taxes are going to the clearly defined costs in that area? Despite acknowledging they cost NHS and other parts of government and knowing your tax burden has increased.
Your VAT did not go down last year, for instance, did it? Your council tax?, Your Income tax? Etc.
Less than savoury politicians loved people like you when I was working in government. Believed everything they said.
Gooses point was that I am affected by asylum seeker numbers on a daily basis. I argue that I am not, your points are about tax rises costing me more.
However it doesnt cost me more today than it did 5 years ago or 10 years ago so I dont feel any financial impact in my pay packet in fact taxes e.g. Ees NI went down reducing my tax burden so how does it affect me. Maybe Im just lucky that Im financially sound and dont need to worry about where every penny of my taxes are spent. I only think about it if my overall tax burden increases and I dont feel like it has! I mean VAT went up in 2011 way before the more recent rises in immigration so I cant see where taxes have increased at all.
Maybe you are right that Im apathetic as Im not affected. But some people get angry about immigration but I just am not. Maybe its because you are that you feel the need to point out the expense. I dont know!
ironsofcanada wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 22:11BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:51And you seem to be grasping at straws because you dont get how taxes work.
Go on show me where and when any of the current or previous govts have specifically increased taxes due to Asylum seeker numbers increasing.
That budget has always been there as it covers all sorts of foreign aid and yes it goes up and down depending on the need and yes it goes up to cover asylum seekers but at no point in history has any govt raised the rate of VAT or Ees NI or Excise duty specifically to cover in incease in that part of the budget so it does not directly cost me more.
The cost of asylum seekers is so negligible compared to the overall budget that any increase or decrease in that cost wont affect the taxes the individual is asked to pay.
What dont you understand!So unless you get a line item on your taxes that says "For Asylum Seekers" you are not going to believe your taxes are going to the clearly defined costs in that area? Despite acknowledging they cost NHS and other parts of government and knowing your tax burden has increased.
Your VAT did not go down last year, for instance, did it? Your council tax?, Your Income tax? Etc.
Less than savoury politicians loved people like you when I was working in government. Believed everything they said.
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:51And you seem to be grasping at straws because you dont get how taxes work.
Go on show me where and when any of the current or previous govts have specifically increased taxes due to Asylum seeker numbers increasing.
That budget has always been there as it covers all sorts of foreign aid and yes it goes up and down depending on the need and yes it goes up to cover asylum seekers but at no point in history has any govt raised the rate of VAT or Ees NI or Excise duty specifically to cover in incease in that part of the budget so it does not directly cost me more.
The cost of asylum seekers is so negligible compared to the overall budget that any increase or decrease in that cost wont affect the taxes the individual is asked to pay.
What dont you understand!
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:59ironsofcanada wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:43BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:35Who said there wasnt a cost and I never said we should be paying more or should be letting more in. The argument started by Goose or some other idiot was that increased numbers of Asylum seekers costs ME more in tax.
As I have explained numerous times my taxes have not risen due to asylum seeker numbers rising. In fact last year they were reduced by 2%. I agreed the distribution of my tax may have changed to cover the cost of them but my overall tax bill that I pay either from my salary or VAT etc has not increased.
By all means change the argument after you lose the first one you are good at that!!Let's take slow, so I am clear.
You know that your EES NI is not the sum total your tax burden right? That is what you said went down 2%.
I guess what do you think EES NI means?
Its a waste of time you dont understamd any of it do you.
You thought Ers NI was a tax on the individual!!!!
You are just being pedantic my Ees NI went down by 2% points therefore my tax was reduced not overall by 2% but it still went down significantly. Or are you jow just going to pick me up on that and again change the argument.
Simple question did the taxes I pay rise last year? Answer no they went down.
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:51goose wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:32BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:23Ffs you really have no idea do you. April 24 Ees NI went down from 10 to 8%.
Are you now going to argue that Ees NI is not a tax
I’m asking billy son, because you seem to think that a pre election sweetner (as you admitted) is somehow a reflection of the change in tax burden over the last 20 years.
honestly, you’re so out of your depth it’s astounding to read.And you seem to be grasping at straws because you dont get how taxes work.
Go on show me where and when any of the current or previous govts have specifically increased taxes due to Asylum seeker numbers increasing.
That budget has always been there as it covers all sorts of foreign aid and yes it goes up and down depending on the need and yes it goes up to cover asylum seekers but at no point in history has any govt raised the rate of VAT or Ees NI or Excise duty specifically to cover in incease in that part of the budget so it does not directly cost me more.
The cost of asylum seekers is so negligible compared to the overall budget that any increase or decrease in that cost wont affect the taxes the individual is asked to pay.
What dont you understand!
goose wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:46 “Over the past decade, the financial impact of illegal immigration on UK taxpayers has escalated significantly. In the fiscal year 2019/20, the Home Office planned to spend £430 million on asylum, border, visa, and passport operations. However, by 2023/24, actual spending had surged to approximately £4 billion, reflecting a substantial increase in costs associated with managing illegal immigration and asylum seekers.”
ironsofcanada wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:43BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:35Who said there wasnt a cost and I never said we should be paying more or should be letting more in. The argument started by Goose or some other idiot was that increased numbers of Asylum seekers costs ME more in tax.
As I have explained numerous times my taxes have not risen due to asylum seeker numbers rising. In fact last year they were reduced by 2%. I agreed the distribution of my tax may have changed to cover the cost of them but my overall tax bill that I pay either from my salary or VAT etc has not increased.
By all means change the argument after you lose the first one you are good at that!!Let's take slow, so I am clear.
You know that your EES NI is not the sum total your tax burden right? That is what you said went down 2%.
I guess what do you think EES NI means?
goose wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:32BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:23Ffs you really have no idea do you. April 24 Ees NI went down from 10 to 8%.
Are you now going to argue that Ees NI is not a tax
I’m asking billy son, because you seem to think that a pre election sweetner (as you admitted) is somehow a reflection of the change in tax burden over the last 20 years.
honestly, you’re so out of your depth it’s astounding to read.
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:35Who said there wasnt a cost and I never said we should be paying more or should be letting more in. The argument started by Goose or some other idiot was that increased numbers of Asylum seekers costs ME more in tax.
As I have explained numerous times my taxes have not risen due to asylum seeker numbers rising. In fact last year they were reduced by 2%. I agreed the distribution of my tax may have changed to cover the cost of them but my overall tax bill that I pay either from my salary or VAT etc has not increased.
By all means change the argument after you lose the first one you are good at that!!
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:35ironsofcanada wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:11Sorry, mate
Are you naive enough to believe the government honestly tells you exactly what they are doing with your money? It's political suicide. If you believe it has and will never abuse surveilence power...I guess you might be.
But just in this specific area - your taxes have risen to pay for the increased cost of the NHS, you said asylum seekers add to the cost of the NHS. You therefore are paying more taxes because of it - by your statements.
Please fill yer boots arguing that the UK should be paying more to support asylum seekers because...its the right thing to do. Its a postion. But please don't pretend there isn't a cost and that the cost is not carried by the taxpayer.
Have a good Sunday.Who said there wasnt a cost and I never said we should be paying more or should be letting more in. The argument started by Goose or some other idiot was that increased numbers of Asylum seekers costs ME more in tax.
As I have explained numerous times my taxes have not risen due to asylum seeker numbers rising. In fact last year they were reduced by 2%. I agreed the distribution of my tax may have changed to cover the cost of them but my overall tax bill that I pay either from my salary or VAT etc has not increased.
By all means change the argument after you lose the first one you are good at that!!
ironsofcanada wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:27BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 20:54Nope! because the question was do I pay more tax due to increased Asylum seekers costs and I dont as I said in fact my tax has actually been reduced by 2%.
Case closed!Wait one second.
Surely you don't think that that your ERS NI is the only indication of the tax you pay?
ironsofcanada wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:11Sorry, mate
Are you naive enough to believe the government honestly tells you exactly what they are doing with your money? It's political suicide. If you believe it has and will never abuse surveilence power...I guess you might be.
But just in this specific area - your taxes have risen to pay for the increased cost of the NHS, you said asylum seekers add to the cost of the NHS. You therefore are paying more taxes because of it - by your statements.
Please fill yer boots arguing that the UK should be paying more to support asylum seekers because...its the right thing to do. Its a postion. But please don't pretend there isn't a cost and that the cost is not carried by the taxpayer.
Have a good Sunday.
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:23goose wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:02BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 20:54Nope! because the question was do I pay more tax due to increased Asylum seekers costs and I dont as I said in fact my tax has actually been reduced by 2%.
Case closed!Reduced by 2% since when exactly? And which tax are we talking about?Ffs you really have no idea do you. April 24 Ees NI went down from 10 to 8%.
Are you now going to argue that Ees NI is not a tax![]()
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 20:54Nope! because the question was do I pay more tax due to increased Asylum seekers costs and I dont as I said in fact my tax has actually been reduced by 2%.
Case closed!
goose wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 21:02BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 20:54ironsofcanada wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 20:40"Not all" = some are. Correct?
So you your self have established that there is a cost to the NHS from asylum seekers.
You pay for that. Case closed.Nope! because the question was do I pay more tax due to increased Asylum seekers costs and I dont as I said in fact my tax has actually been reduced by 2%.
Case closed!Reduced by 2% since when exactly? And which tax are we talking about?
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 20:51goose wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 19:59BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑23 Feb 2025, 19:50No I havent I do not pay more tax because of asylum seekers. When did the govt increases taxes specifically to cover asylum costs? Answer : they didnt.
Youve changed your question to has it impacted how its distributed. Answer : yes by something like 0.1 of 1%.
You think asylum seekers are responsible for the £9bn increase in NHS costs do you?Of course you pay more tax. You’ve been shown how the tax burden has risen with inflation, you’ve also got the chancellor outlining the pressures it causes on tax revenue.
nobody said £9bn is solely down to immigration, but it’s a simple fact that more people = more higher cost of running the NHS.What are you not getting I do not pay more tax and neither do you.
So costs rise, the Chancellor wants more funds to pay for everything what did she do - she increased Employers NI. Did that increase my tax - no! Did she say due to the increased costs of Asylum seekers we are increasing Ers NI or was it due to the rising costs of the NHS, Education etc and the overall budget defecit left by the previous govt? Yes she did say that.
Oh and that tax budget includes Asylum seeker costs which is less that 0.3% of the total. So is materially negligible and was not the reason Ers NI was increased.
In fact inspite of the rising costs of the NHS and Education etc to this country my tax has fallen in the last 12 months as the prev govt reduced Ees NI by 2%age points as an election sweetener. Sorry forgot about that FACT!