Page 12 of 20

Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 11 Oct 2023, 09:05
by twoleftfeet
Clearly the guy is a sexual predator but my question is why are all of these women only coming out now? If Jolie and Paltrow had reported him 25 years ago then surely this would have stopped him? Surely by saying nothing they are assisting an offender?

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 18:46
by SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Thank you for accepting you lied H&P. The reason you are a wrong-un has already been pointed out to you several times. Explaining it yet again would serve no purpose.

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 18:37
by Lee Trundle
"It's not the first time Pickled has stuck up for a sex case, is it?"

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 18:29
by Hammer and Pickle
"Yes Zero. How does make me a ""wrong'un""?"

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 18:28
by mashed in maryland
"So Pickled jumped to the defence of a paedophile, then suddenly realised what he'd done and is now trying to worm his way out of it. Everyone saw it and the only reason more people aren't cunting him off is because it's the sort of thing you expect from him."

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 18:26
by SurfaceAgentX2Zero
H&P That isn't what you posted H&P. You posted that those who defended him had 'good reasons' to do so. Those reasons were stated as being something or other to do with a judge making a name for himself by not giving him a fair trial. 'I also think he would not have faced a proper fair trial. Not a biggie when you consider the general implications of judges using statutory rape charges to further their careers' What you posted is only a few posts down - anyone can see it. Why would you add lying to being a wrong-un?

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 18:07
by Hammer and Pickle
"What's a proper judge's job if it isn't about listening to a defendant's case and any ""good reasons"" there might be in it? You are a pathetic inadequate on WHO everyday, Zero. Now a judge that does his job properly would also, presumably, be a ""wrongun"" in your book. Impressive level of intellectual feebleness right there."

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 17:24
by SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Hammer and Pickle 1:55 Thu Oct 12 'I wasn't defending anyone' Yes you were. You described those who defend him as having 'good reasons' and then went on to specify some feeble conspiracy theory stuff about a judge trying to make a name for himself at Polanski's expense.. You're a wrong-un'. You've been caught being a wrong-un' and now you're trying to pretend you didn't post what you did. No change there.

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 17:17
by twoleftfeet
"Another actress has now come out and said she was raped on 2 separate occasions by 2 men who she describes as narcissistic white men, this happened 7 years ago and both are very powerful. She won’t however name them which means they can go on raping women. Not very sisterly is it."

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 15:04
by Sven Roeder
Roman Polanski drugged a 13 yo and then raped her. What charges did you actually expect him to face? I would like to know what any possible defence of him would consist of. I am happy to say he is a great director and has made some brilliant films. But he should be in jail and should have been for a long time.

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 14:46
by Golden Oldie
"""Weinstein is screwed now. All the law suits will crucify him worse than actually being crucified on a cross..."" Ha Ha Ha So clever as it works as a double stab in the eye to the dumb Christian goy, because Hollywood hates Christians and the entire MO of Pedowood is to attack the central core values of the very same society that allowed it to thrive and pervert and corrupt that same society. Good one Then there's your hypocritical ""lefty liberals"" forever attacking gun rights of the everyday regular American people while glamorising gunplay in the movies they act in while having armed security tail and protect them at every movie launch or opening they go, or blame white privilege and accuse all white men as biologically compelled sexual predators when they know precisely who is really runs hollyweird and responsible for casting-raping couch selection for roles including the paedophile rings etc ""The Specifically Jewy Perviness of Harvey Weinstein The disgraced film producer is a character straight out of Philip Roth, playing out his revenge fantasies on the Goyim"" - By Mark Oppenheimer http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/246724/the-specifically-jewy-perviness-of-harvey-weinstein"

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 14:25
by Takashi Miike
"illiterate or not, you're a fucking wrongun"

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 14:23
by Eddie B
Hammer and Pickle 1:12 Thu Oct 12 She was fucking 13 years old. How's that a judge trying to make a name for himself?

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 14:11
by Hammer and Pickle
* a very. I think Weinstein is an odious prick.

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 14:10
by Hammer and Pickle
I think he was guilty as fuck IOC. I also think he would not have faced a proper fair trial. Not a biggie when you consider the general implications of judges using statutory rape charges to further their careers. Only takes a little imagination to appreciate that this would take us to avert bad place.

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 14:10
by Lee Trundle
"What's your opinion of Anthony Weiner, Pickled? Was he hard done by?"

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 14:05
by Hammer and Pickle
"No, it's the only bit you can say anything about though Dave."

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 14:04
by LeroysBoots
twoleftfeet 1:18 Thu Oct 12 Spot on I have no idea what people see in this thing

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 13:58
by Johnson
It's the Polan bit that got you leaping to his defence wasn't it Thickle?

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 13:55
by Hammer and Pickle
"I wasn't defending anyone only explaining why people do defend Pola?Ñski. Meanwhile, you might want to learn how to read before getting all het up like that Miike. It's far to easy to manipulate excitable illiterates like you."

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 13:55
by Hammer and Pickle
"I wasn't defending anyone only explaining why people do defend Pola?Ñski. Meanwhile, you might want to learn how to read before getting all het up like that Miike. It's far to easy to manipulate excitable illiterates like you."

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 13:41
by Takashi Miike
not surprised the giraffe necked cսnt is now apologising for Polanski

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 13:36
by ironsofcanada
"Hammer and Pickle 1:12 Thu Oct 12 Honest question - do you not think he was guilty of the charge he plead guilty to? And if he was, was that charge justly punished by the probation he expected?"

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 13:35
by ironsofcanada
"BRANDED 1:20 Thu Oct 12 So in other words, what you posted was pointless other than showing you get a little upset and start to throw insults when I refer back to what you have said about your political positions. Good to know, carry on then."

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 13:29
by Swiss.
OOM I heard Spacey bats for the other team like Will Smith

Re: Harvey Weinstein.

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 13:20
by BRANDED
No. I personally dont know all the people who work in the entertainment industry. Fucking amazing right? How do you manage to reason so inanely?