West Ham Online

"I’m sure some of you must know? Lineker, Rylan and Jeremy Vine have ruled themselves out. I’m sensing the “ victim “ is male by the way Sky news are talking about it. Some proper wrong uns on TV."

"Mike - several major journalists tried repeatedly to expose Savile: including Paul Connew at the Mirror in the early 90s. He was advised by the paper’s lawyers that they did not have the evidence threshold to name him. Other hacks, too. Don’t assume that because “the media” fail to expose somebody it’s because there’s some weird collusion or cover up going on on the part of the journalists. It’s sometimes others who prevent disclosure. Savile was, belatedly, exposed by a journalist - albeit after the BBC panicked and initially blocked their own team from doing it. In this instance, one of the key issues preventing disclosure of the BBC presenter’s name is that aspects of The Sun’s story have looked a bit like jelly since it was published. And today you saw the alleged “victim” trash their own mother’s version of events. The “story” is clearly not as straightforward as some think. As other journalists (elsewhere) suspected or knew. British journalism can be a cess pit at times, no question. But not all of it is. Decisions are often influenced by lawyers, bureaucrats, managers and twonks. And some media orgs rarely turn down opportunities to swing for a competitor."

I've seen the Huw picture. Jesus he is a suicide risk now eh? He has had better days that's for sure

Agenda to get rid of the BBC? Heard it all now

"Its normally the cover up that does the most damage. Instead of just dumping one wrong'un, they will end up further tarnishing the entire organisation. Marriane vorspringer will be all over this latest misinformation."

Cover up in process

Sounds like they’ve been paid off now

You’d have thought if he wanted some sexy pics of a young crackhead they would be available for free somewhere on the internet?

"""and now the news.....First of all, Are you alright? It feels very strange to be sitting here tonight without......"""

"I don't normally watch the bbc 6pm propaganda/news, but had a look at it tonight. firstly, they talk to the viewer like playchool presenters addressing children, hahaha, but what stood out was the cunts making a point about the youngster in question not just hiring any old lawyer, but one from a top firm. he must have change left over from the ¬£35k ?üòÇ"

"Hello Mrs. Jones 8:47 Mon Jul 10 The star (who BBC news have no idea who it could be, according to the BBC) apparently texted the victim and said ""what have you done?"". He may have also said ""There's lovely"""

The Sun- wat a scabby paper

I think some money has changed hands

Is it Gordon the Gofer?

Where is Matthew Wright when you need him?

Nothing to see here.

"LAF, 7.43."

Bunch of old fishwives on here. Bloody hell. Get a life.

A spokesperson has just commented that everything is not as black and white as it appears currently especially on Social media. The person in question is getting together his reply (defence). That’s why there is a delay in him coming forward. Clearly the crack head will not be getting his own TV show any time soon

"You'd think so, unless he's physically unable to."

"You'd think so, unless he's physically unable to."

"If it's not Huw Edwards and I were him, I'd call in a sickie this week, sit back and watch social & mainstream media implode."

If Huw Edwards is not the suspect you'd think he would run through walls to present tonights news at 10

"Exactly that. If it's someone that prominent, they'll be conspicuous by their absence. I bet the first 2 mins of the news tonight gets the highest viewing figures in a long time."

Huw Edwards is straightforward enough. If he doesn't appear on BBC news at 10 this week then it's a fair bet it's him. I think in any case the person concerned will make a statement in the next couple of days.

southbank - agreed on that. theres an agenda to get rid of beeb - make it obviously untrustworthy etc im not the biggest fan but it is in theroy free of commercial interest (ok government can manipulate it)